2MONDAY 1 SEPTEMBER 20140900-0915 2D3 The Role of Demonstrating in Surgical TrainingBhavna Gami*, The London Postgraduate School of Surgery, London, United Kingdom; Nigel Standfield, London Schoolof Surgery, Anatomy, London, United Kingdom; Claire Smith, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Anatomy, Surgery andCancer, Brighton, United Kingdom; Ceri Davies, Imperial College School of Medicine, Surgery, London, United Kingdom0915-0930 2D4 Effects of free, cued, and modelled-reflection on medical students’ diagnostic competenceCassio Ibiapina*, CAPES Foundation, Ministery of Education of Brazil, Brasília/DF, Pediatria, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; SilviaMamede, Institute of Medical Education Research, Erasmus MC and Department of Psychology, Erasmus UniversityRotterdam, Department of Psychology, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Alexandre Moura, UNIFENAS Medical School, EducacaoMedica, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Silvana Santos, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Propedeutica Complementar, BeloHorizonte, Brazil; Tamara Van Gog, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Department of Psychology, Rotterdam, Netherlands0930-0945 2D5 Time matters, Realism in resuscitation trainingKristian Krogh*, Aarhus University, Centre for Medical Education, Aarhus N, Denmark; Christian B Høyer, Aarhus University,Centre for Medical Education, Aarhus N, Denmark; Doris Østergaard, Herlev Hospital and Copenhagen University, DanishInstitute for Medical Simulation, Herlev, Denmark; Berit Eika, Aarhus University, Centre for Medical Education, Aarhus N,Denmark0945-1000 2D6 Improvements in the diagnostic performance of medical students related to the constructionand retention of System 2 decision rules in long term memoryFrank Papa*, UNTHSC, Medical Education, Fort Worth, United States; Richard Baldwin, UNTHSC, Medical Education,Fort Worth, United States1000-1015 Discussion0830-1015 2E SHORT COMMUNICATIONS: Curriculum EvaluationChairperson: Barbara Barzansky (United States)Location: Brown 1, Level +2, MiCo0830-0845 2E1 Factors influencing students’ skills in giving effective feedback: A qualitative studyShabnam Ahmed*, Faculty of Medicine-King Fahad Medical City, King Saud Bin Abdul Aziz University of Health Sciences,Medical Education, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Fadi Munshi, Faculty of Medicine-King Fahad Medical City, King Saud Bin AbdulAziz University of Health Sciences, Medical Education, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia0845-0900 2E2 Curriculum Review Process aimed to improve integration in a traditional Doctor of VeterinaryMedicine programCarmen Fuentealba*, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Center for Research and Innovation in Veterinary andMedical Education, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis; Janet Beeler-Marfisis, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine,North Brunswick; John Dascanio; Jennifer Moffet; Eric Pope; Ashutosh Verma0900-0915 2E3 The question of students’ satisfaction and motivation – a working motivational system modelBalázs Ernyey*, University of Pécs- Medical School, Department of Behavioral Sciences, Pécs, Hungary; Ádám Tibor Schlégl,University of Pecs- Medical School, Department of Orthopaedics, Pécs, Hungary; Zsuzsanna Füzesi, University of Pécs-Medical School, Department of Behavioral Sciences, Pécs, Hungary; Ádám Feldmann, University of Pécs- Medical School,Department of Behavioral Sciences, Pécs, Hungary0915-0930 2E4 Postgraduate perspective on the undergraduate medical curriculum: Former students’ and theirpost-graduate tutors’ viewMaria Magalhães, Faculty of Health Science, University of Beira Interior (Covilhã-Portugal), Santa Maria da Feira, PortugalLuís Patrão*, Faculty of Health Science, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal; Ricardo Tjeng; Miguel Castelo-BrancoPatrao0930-0945 2E5 An analysis of the quality of undergraduate medical education at Aksum University’s newMedical School, EthiopiaTim Crocker-Buque*, Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, London, UnitedKingdom0945-1000 2E6 Effective student feedback to drive changeKeith Wylde*, The University of Edinburgh, ACT Office Centre for Medical Education, Edinburgh, United Kingdom;Neil Turner, The University of Edinburgh, The Medical School, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Helen Cameron, The Universityof Edinburgh, Centre for Medical Education, Edinburgh, United Kingdom1000-1015 2E7 Longitudinal outcome analysis: USMLE Step 1 to ResidencyHiroko Yoshida*, American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine, Administration, St. Maarten, NetherlandsAntilles; Joe Miller, American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine, Pharmacology, St. Maarten, NetherlandsAntillesNo discussion– 45 –
0830-1015 2F SHORT COMMUNICATIONS: Patil Teaching Innovation Awards 1: shortlisted presentations(see page 12)Chairperson / Opening Discussant: Gary Rogers (Australia)Location: Theatre Room 11, Level 0, MiCo0830-0845 2F1 Disease & Illness: Teaching the humanistic dimensions of care through the Longitudinal Educational Experienceto Advance Patient Partnerships (LEAP) ProgramTJ Jirasevijinda*, Weill Cornell Medical College, Pediatrics, New York, United States; Keith LaScalea, Weill Cornell MedicalCollege, Internal Medicine, New York, United States; Veronica LoFaso, Weill Cornell Medical College, Internal Medicine,New York, United States; Michael Lockshin, Hospital for Special Surgery, Rheumatology, New York, United States; ErnieEsquivel, Weill Cornell Medical College, Internal Medicine, New York, United States; Carol Capello, Weill Cornell MedicalCollege, Academic Affairs, New York, United States0845-0900 2F2 A ‘scattergun’ approach to educator skills for clinical teachersLouise Young*, James Cook University, School of Medicine, Townsville, Australia0900-0915 2F3 Eight years’ experience with a Medical Education Journal Club in Mexico: The challenges ofsustainability and learningMelchor Sánchez-Mendiola*, UNAM Faculty of Medicine, Medical Education, Mexico City, Mexico; Daniel Morales-Castillo,UNAM Faculty of Medicine, Medical Education, Mexico City, Mexico; Uri Torruco-García, UNAM Faculty of Medicine, MedicalEducation, Mexico City, Mexico; Margarita Varela-Ruiz, UNAM Faculty of Medicine, Medical Education, Mexico City, Mexico0915-0930 2F4 A peer-led international programme to equip medical students with leadership skills to affectchange in healthcareF A E Knights, King’s College London, Medical School, London, United Kingdom; D P H Knights*, University of Cambridge,School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom; A P N Gopfert, Newcastle University, Medical School, Newcastleupon-Tyne,United Kingdom0930-0945 2F5 The role of tactical decision games (TDGs) as a novel method of teaching non-technical skills (NTS)to final year medical studentsIain Drummond*, The University of Edinburgh, Centre for Medical Education, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Janet Skinner,University of Edinburgh, Centre for Medical Education, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Morwenna Wood, NHS Fife, MedicalEducation, Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom0945-1000 2F6 Bringing the world to the bedside: The role of distance-learning partnerships in overcominggeopolitical barriers to medical educationRose S. Penfold*, University of Oxford, Medical Sciences Division, Oxford, United Kingdom; Mohammad A. Ali, Universityof Oxford, Medical Sciences Division, Oxford, United Kingdom; Adam M. Ali, Oxford University Clinical Academic GraduateSchool, Oxford, United Kingdom; Ishita Patel, Oxford University Hospitals, Medical Sciences Division, Oxford, UnitedKingdom1000-1015 Discussion0830-1015 2G SHORT COMMUNICATIONS: OSCE 1 – Scoring an OSCEChairperson:Location: Theatre Room 12, Level 0, MiCo0830-0845 2G1 OSCE checklist scores: to standardize or not to standardize?Godfrey Pell*, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Medical Education, Leeds, United Kingdom; Jennifer Hallam, Universityof Leeds, Leeds Institute of Medical Education, Leeds, United Kingdom; Matt Homer, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute ofMedical Education, Leeds, United Kingdom; Richard Fuller, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Medical Education, Leeds,United Kingdom0845-0900 2G2 Checklist item weighting: Theoretical, psychometric and empirical perspectivesMatt Homer*, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Medical Education, Leeds, United Kingdom, Godfrey Pell, University ofLeeds, Leeds Institute of Medical Education, Leeds, United Kingdom, Richard Fuller, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute ofMedical Education, Leeds, United Kingdom0900-0915 2G3 Reliability Analysis of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination with Generalizability TheoryAndrés Trejo-Mejía*, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Medicina, México D.F., Mexico; AdriánMartínez-González, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Medicina, Mexico D.F., Mexico; IgnacioMéndez-Ramírez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Matematicas Aplicadas y Sistemas, Mexico D.F.,Mexico; Melchor Sánchez-Mendiola, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Medicina, Mexico D.F., Mexico0915-0930 2G4 Correlation of Self Assessment and Peer Assessment to the Passing Grade of the OSCE in Level 2and Level 4 Students, Faculty of Medicine UNISBASantun Bhekti Rahimah, Faculty of Medicine Unisba, Pharmacology, Bandung, Indonesia; Mia Kusmiati*, Faculty of MedicineUnisba, Biochemistry, Bandung, Indonesia; Ermina Widyastuti, Faculty of Medicine Unisba, Pathology Anatomi, Bandung,Indonesia0930-0945 2G5 Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) to Investigate Examiner and Site as Sources of Variationin the National Assessment Collaboration (NAC) Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)Marguerite Roy,* Medical Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada; Stefanie Sebok, Queen’s University, Ottawa, Canada;Don Klinger, Queen’s University, Canada; André De Champlain, Medical Council of Canada, Canada– 46 –