30.11.2012 Views

Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy: An Introduction to TEM ...

Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy: An Introduction to TEM ...

Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy: An Introduction to TEM ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Transmission <strong>Electron</strong> Microscope 81<br />

Besides producing contrast in the <strong>TEM</strong> image, the objective aperture<br />

limits the amount <strong>of</strong> image blurring that arises from spherical and chromatic<br />

aberration. By restricting the range <strong>of</strong> scattering angles <strong>to</strong> values less than �,<br />

given by Eq. (3.9), the loss <strong>of</strong> spatial resolution is limited <strong>to</strong> an amount rs �<br />

Cs� 3 due <strong>to</strong> spherical aberration and rc � Cc � (�E/E0) due <strong>to</strong> chromatic<br />

aberration. Here, Cs and Cc are aberration coefficients <strong>of</strong> the objective lens<br />

(Chapter 2); �E represents the spread in kinetic energy <strong>of</strong> the electrons<br />

emerging from the specimen, and E0 is their kinetic energy before entering<br />

the specimen. Because both rs and rc decrease with aperture size, it might be<br />

thought that the best resolution corresponds <strong>to</strong> the smallest possible aperture<br />

diameter. But in practice, objective diaphragm gives rise <strong>to</strong> a diffraction effect that<br />

becomes more severe as its diameter decreases, as discussed in Section 1.1,<br />

leading <strong>to</strong> a further loss <strong>of</strong> resolution �x given by the Rayleigh criterion:<br />

�x � 0.6 �/sin�� 0.6 �/� (3.10)<br />

where we have assumed that � is small and is measured in radians.<br />

Ignoring chromatic aberration for the moment, we can combine the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> spherical aberration and electron diffraction at the objective diaphragm by<br />

adding the two blurring effects <strong>to</strong>gether, so that the image resolution �r<br />

(measured in the object plane) is<br />

�r � rs + �x � Cs� 3 + 0.6 �/� (3.11)<br />

Because the two terms in Eq. (3.11) have opposite �-dependence, their sum<br />

is represented by a curve that displays a minimum value; see Fig. 3-13. To a<br />

first approximation, we can find the optimum aperture semi-angle �*<br />

(corresponding <strong>to</strong> smallest �r) by supposing that both terms make equal<br />

contributions at � = �*. Equating both terms gives (�*) 4 = 0.6 �/Cs and<br />

results in �* = 0.88 (�/Cs) 1/4 .<br />

blurring<br />

measured<br />

in the<br />

object<br />

plane<br />

0<br />

��<br />

�r<br />

C s � �<br />

�x<br />

�<br />

Figure 3-13. Loss or resolution due <strong>to</strong> spherical aberration (in the objective lens) and<br />

diffraction (at the objective aperture). The solid curve shows the combined effect.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!