Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy: An Introduction to TEM ...
Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy: An Introduction to TEM ...
Physical Principles of Electron Microscopy: An Introduction to TEM ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Transmission <strong>Electron</strong> Microscope 81<br />
Besides producing contrast in the <strong>TEM</strong> image, the objective aperture<br />
limits the amount <strong>of</strong> image blurring that arises from spherical and chromatic<br />
aberration. By restricting the range <strong>of</strong> scattering angles <strong>to</strong> values less than �,<br />
given by Eq. (3.9), the loss <strong>of</strong> spatial resolution is limited <strong>to</strong> an amount rs �<br />
Cs� 3 due <strong>to</strong> spherical aberration and rc � Cc � (�E/E0) due <strong>to</strong> chromatic<br />
aberration. Here, Cs and Cc are aberration coefficients <strong>of</strong> the objective lens<br />
(Chapter 2); �E represents the spread in kinetic energy <strong>of</strong> the electrons<br />
emerging from the specimen, and E0 is their kinetic energy before entering<br />
the specimen. Because both rs and rc decrease with aperture size, it might be<br />
thought that the best resolution corresponds <strong>to</strong> the smallest possible aperture<br />
diameter. But in practice, objective diaphragm gives rise <strong>to</strong> a diffraction effect that<br />
becomes more severe as its diameter decreases, as discussed in Section 1.1,<br />
leading <strong>to</strong> a further loss <strong>of</strong> resolution �x given by the Rayleigh criterion:<br />
�x � 0.6 �/sin�� 0.6 �/� (3.10)<br />
where we have assumed that � is small and is measured in radians.<br />
Ignoring chromatic aberration for the moment, we can combine the effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> spherical aberration and electron diffraction at the objective diaphragm by<br />
adding the two blurring effects <strong>to</strong>gether, so that the image resolution �r<br />
(measured in the object plane) is<br />
�r � rs + �x � Cs� 3 + 0.6 �/� (3.11)<br />
Because the two terms in Eq. (3.11) have opposite �-dependence, their sum<br />
is represented by a curve that displays a minimum value; see Fig. 3-13. To a<br />
first approximation, we can find the optimum aperture semi-angle �*<br />
(corresponding <strong>to</strong> smallest �r) by supposing that both terms make equal<br />
contributions at � = �*. Equating both terms gives (�*) 4 = 0.6 �/Cs and<br />
results in �* = 0.88 (�/Cs) 1/4 .<br />
blurring<br />
measured<br />
in the<br />
object<br />
plane<br />
0<br />
��<br />
�r<br />
C s � �<br />
�x<br />
�<br />
Figure 3-13. Loss or resolution due <strong>to</strong> spherical aberration (in the objective lens) and<br />
diffraction (at the objective aperture). The solid curve shows the combined effect.