12.07.2015 Views

Tikchik village: a nineteenth century riverine community in ... - Cluster

Tikchik village: a nineteenth century riverine community in ... - Cluster

Tikchik village: a nineteenth century riverine community in ... - Cluster

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cont<strong>in</strong>uityand InnovationIt can be stated at the outset that the <strong>Tikchik</strong> collection of traditionalEskimo artifacts, <strong>in</strong> spite of certa<strong>in</strong> special characteristics, iswell with<strong>in</strong> the tradition of coastal Yuk culture; the <strong>in</strong>habitants ofthe <strong>village</strong> possessed a material culture not radically different fromthat of their coastal relatives. This fact is clearly illustrated whenthe <strong>Tikchik</strong> traditional artifacts are compared with the follow<strong>in</strong>g importantcollections : ethnographic materials collected by Nelson (1899)<strong>in</strong> the central Ber<strong>in</strong>g Sea coastal region near the turn of the <strong>century</strong>;an historic and recent-prehistoric archaeological collection fromHooper Bay Village south of the Yukon Delta (Oswalt, 1952a); asite atrecent-prehistoric archaeological assemblage from the Togiakthe mouth of the river of that name (Kowta, n.d.), and an historicarchaeological collection from Crow Village on the middle KuskokwimRiver (Oswalt and VanStone, 1967).Very briefly, such a comparisonreveals that an overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g majorityof the traditionalartifacts <strong>in</strong> all categories can be duplicated <strong>in</strong> one of these four collections.Resemblance between the <strong>Tikchik</strong> collection and those olNelson and Kowta are particularly strik<strong>in</strong>g and would doubtless beeven more so if wooden artifacts had been preserved at <strong>Tikchik</strong>.The <strong>n<strong>in</strong>eteenth</strong> <strong>century</strong> <strong>in</strong>habitants of the Ber<strong>in</strong>g Sea coast possesseda cultural <strong>in</strong>ventory which was not only well adapted to seamammal hunt<strong>in</strong>g and hunt<strong>in</strong>g and trapp<strong>in</strong>g on land, but also to thetak<strong>in</strong>g of fish. Thus they were able to adjust economically to anyenvironmental situation that was compatible with their varied technology.It has been noted that when these people entered the KuskokwimRiver system, fish<strong>in</strong>g and land hunt<strong>in</strong>g methods were emphasizedwhile the sea mammal hunt<strong>in</strong>g technology withered awayand was forgotten (Oswalt and VanStone, 1967, p. 2) The same can.little is knownbe said for the Nushagak River system and, althoughconcern<strong>in</strong>g the Yuk movement <strong>in</strong>land <strong>in</strong> this region,that close ties have always been ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed with the coastal peopleshere as well as along the Kuskokwim.it seems clearAlthough no exhaustive comparative analysis of the <strong>Tikchik</strong> artifactswill be attempted, it is certa<strong>in</strong> that even with<strong>in</strong> the context of306

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!