12.07.2015 Views

Tikchik village: a nineteenth century riverine community in ... - Cluster

Tikchik village: a nineteenth century riverine community in ... - Cluster

Tikchik village: a nineteenth century riverine community in ... - Cluster

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 347forest-dwell<strong>in</strong>g Eskimos, both shared a diversity of economies withan emphasis on fish<strong>in</strong>g, both had ties with the coast and with AthapascanIndians. The Kobuk River people, however, placed moreemphasis on caribou hunt<strong>in</strong>g and probably ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed closer tieswith coastal Eskimos. The Crow Village people, on the other hand,may have had closer ties with the Indians and certa<strong>in</strong>ly possessedgreater economic stability due to the abundance of salmon. A comparisonof Arctic Woodland Culture traits with the Crow Villagecollection tended to confirm the above pattern, particularly with regardto the greater <strong>in</strong>tensity of coastal contacts found on the Kobuk(Oswalt and VanStone, 1967, pp. 106-108).While question<strong>in</strong>g the usefulness of the Arctic Woodland Cultureas a configuration applicable to the central Kuskokwim, Oswalt andI were nevertheless reluctant not to recognize that "<strong>river<strong>in</strong>e</strong> Eskimocultures at the time of historic contact were <strong>in</strong> many ways dist<strong>in</strong>ctfrom their coastal neighbors" (1967, p. 109). We go on to suggestthat "perhaps it might be useful to conceive of a configuration ofAlaskan <strong>river<strong>in</strong>e</strong> Eskimo characteristics. The traits would <strong>in</strong>cludediverse fish<strong>in</strong>g techniques for tak<strong>in</strong>g salmon and whitefish <strong>in</strong> particular.The use of trees, ... is important, . The relative . . stabilityof physical settlement is a function of the productivity of the environment.. There is also the trade with coastal Eskimos <strong>in</strong> which. .there is the exchange of forest-<strong>river<strong>in</strong>e</strong> products for those of the seacoast.It should be stressed also that like most Eskimos these peoplema<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed a flexibility <strong>in</strong> their subsistence pursuits. They exploitedland animals as well as fish, but their economic stability came fromfish<strong>in</strong>g" (1967, p. 109).It is obvious, of course, that the <strong>Tikchik</strong> site exhibits all the characteristicsof a <strong>river<strong>in</strong>e</strong> Eskimo configuration and one would hardlyexpect it to do otherwise. There are, however, certa<strong>in</strong> features of lifeat <strong>Tikchik</strong>, as we have reconstructed it, that call for more detailedcomment. To beg<strong>in</strong> with, it seems likely that ties with the coast weresomewhat stronger than at Crow Village but less than on the KobukRiver. The presence of the Nushagak post and later the salmon canneriesserved to draw the residents of <strong>Tikchik</strong> to Nushagak Bay atleast once a year and we know that while they were there they tradedfor coastal products. However, coastal subsistence techniques arenot reflected <strong>in</strong> the material culture at <strong>Tikchik</strong> and it is highly unlikelythat the <strong>in</strong>habitants engaged <strong>in</strong> subsistence activities dur<strong>in</strong>gtheir visits, as did the Eskimos of the Kobuk River when they wentto Hotham Inlet and Kotzebue Sound.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!