12.07.2015 Views

Tikchik village: a nineteenth century riverine community in ... - Cluster

Tikchik village: a nineteenth century riverine community in ... - Cluster

Tikchik village: a nineteenth century riverine community in ... - Cluster

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 345p. 230). Representatives of the same sub-cultural groups cont<strong>in</strong>ueto be mentioned <strong>in</strong> the sources until the end of the <strong>century</strong> and itseems likely that although Kiatagmiut may have cont<strong>in</strong>ued to be themost numerous subgroup liv<strong>in</strong>g along the Nushagak River, Eskimosfrom the Kuskokwim and elsewhere already outnumbered Aglegmiut<strong>in</strong> the bay region. Ivan Petroff, <strong>in</strong> collect<strong>in</strong>g data for the TenthFederal Census, noted that many families from the KuskokwimRiver, Yukon Delta, and Norton Sound were liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity ofNushagak (DRHA, vol. 2, pp. 146-147; Bailey, 1880, pp. 26-27;Elliott, 1900, p. 740; Petroff, 1884, p. 136).It will be remembered that <strong>in</strong> 1829 Vasiliev visited the Kuskowagamiut<strong>village</strong> of "Tuksa," a settlement that we have identifiedas <strong>Tikchik</strong>, and that the only population list<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>Tikchik</strong> <strong>in</strong> thehistoric sources <strong>in</strong>dicates that 31 "Kuskaquims" were liv<strong>in</strong>g there <strong>in</strong>1879 (Russian-American Company Records: Communications Sent,vol. 6, no. 244, folio 478; Bailey, 1880, pp. 26-27). With regard tothe population figures, we have noted that they were taken frommission records at Nushagak and there is reason to believe that thesub-cultural designation is correct. That is, that the <strong>in</strong>habitants of<strong>Tikchik</strong> at that time and earlier were not Kiatagmiut as might beexpected, but rather people who had moved <strong>in</strong>to the upper NushagakRiver region from the Kuskokwim River. If this was the case <strong>in</strong> 1829and 1879, the question naturally arises whether Kiatagmiut ever livedat <strong>Tikchik</strong> or whether the settlement was established and then cont<strong>in</strong>uously<strong>in</strong>habited by Kuskowagamiut.Although it is likely that most Kuskokwim River peopleNushagak River region generally and <strong>in</strong> Bristol Bay <strong>in</strong> particular,reached their new homes by way of the Ber<strong>in</strong>g Sea coast, there is no<strong>in</strong> thereason at all why some could not have come <strong>in</strong>to the area by way ofThe various routes between the middle<strong>in</strong>terior rivers and portages.Kuskokwim and the upper tributaries of the Nushagak must havebeen well known to the people of both areas even before the pioneerexplorations of Vasiliev and Kolmakov. Although the Kiatagmiut -Kuskowagamiut boundaries at the time of contact are usually drawnso as to <strong>in</strong>clude the <strong>Tikchik</strong> Lakes area <strong>in</strong> the territory of the former,it may very well have been that this region was un<strong>in</strong>habited, or virtuallyso, at the time the <strong>Tikchik</strong> settlement was established. If, asat least seems possible, it was Kuskowagamiut who pushed <strong>in</strong>to thearea and established the settlement, then the boundaries should probablybe redrawn so as to place this area with<strong>in</strong> the territory of theKuskowagamiut. One might well ask, however, whether people mov-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!