312 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME 56was true for the Kuskokwim was doubtless also true for the Nushagakarea and it should be kept <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that locally made snares, nets,and deadfalls would leave no trace <strong>in</strong> the archaeological record. Boththese and metal traps would be set some distance from the <strong>village</strong>.The latter might frequently be hung <strong>in</strong> trees between trapp<strong>in</strong>g seasonsand never brought back to the <strong>village</strong>. A similar absence ofartifacts associated with trapp<strong>in</strong>g was noted at Crow Village (Oswaltand VanStone, 1967, p. 73), but this does not <strong>in</strong>dicate a lack of <strong>in</strong>trest<strong>in</strong> this activity <strong>in</strong> either <strong>community</strong>.The use of bone <strong>in</strong> the manufacture of artifacts is extremely rareat <strong>Tikchik</strong> as it is <strong>in</strong> most Eskimo sites where antler was available.Only five artifact types (salmon harpoon socket piece, splitt<strong>in</strong>g wedge,caribou scapula scraper, bark peeler, awl) made from locally availablebone were recovered, while the whale bone out of which sled shoe sectionswere made was received <strong>in</strong> trade from the coast.Antler artifacts,on the other hand, are plentiful although conditions for theirpreservation were not particularly favorable. Here cont<strong>in</strong>uity withthe past and with coastal Eskimos is also very clear. In fact, it wouldappear as though fish<strong>in</strong>g was carried out at <strong>Tikchik</strong> almost exclusivelyby aborig<strong>in</strong>al methods; fish spears, salmon harpoons, nets with barkfloats and antler s<strong>in</strong>kers, and l<strong>in</strong>e hooks. The latter have metalbarbs, but the type is essentially aborig<strong>in</strong>al. The prevalence of antlerawls and wedges may suggest a selective factor <strong>in</strong> the acquisitionBoth of these implements can be made easily andof trade goods.would be virtually as satisfactory as any trade substitutes that mightbe obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Thus the old forms are reta<strong>in</strong>ed and the Eskimos' <strong>in</strong>terestscenter on more exotic imports. A f<strong>in</strong>al po<strong>in</strong>t that might bemade with regard to the use of antler concerns the 139 fragments ofcut antler which were recovered. Of these, 78 were found <strong>in</strong> T-1, themidden directly <strong>in</strong> front of kashgee 2, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that, as might be expected,much of the antler work<strong>in</strong>g was done by men <strong>in</strong> the kashgee.It seems virtually certa<strong>in</strong> that the tradition of pottery mak<strong>in</strong>g isseen <strong>in</strong> its last stages at <strong>Tikchik</strong>. The fragments of imported potteryand those of the locally-made ware are just about equal <strong>in</strong> number.It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that the use of clay cook<strong>in</strong>g pots was decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>geven more rapidly at the Crow Village site (Oswalt and VanStone,1967, p. 74) which was abandoned about ten years later than <strong>Tikchik</strong>.Thus it would seem that pottery mak<strong>in</strong>g, at least as far as cook<strong>in</strong>gand storage pots were concerned, came to an end <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terior southwesternAlaska dur<strong>in</strong>g the first decade of the twentieth <strong>century</strong>. Atboth sites the Yukon L<strong>in</strong>e Dot form of decoration was present (Os-
VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 313wait, 1955, p. 37).S<strong>in</strong>ce no substitutes for clay lamps were found ateither Crow Village or <strong>Tikchik</strong> (Oswalt and VanStone, 1967, p. 45),it is likely that this form cont<strong>in</strong>ued to be useful, possibly because ofthe scarcity of imported fuel.In addition to decorated sherds of the Yukon L<strong>in</strong>e Dot type, 12sherds with check stamped impressions were recovered at <strong>Tikchik</strong>.S<strong>in</strong>ce the occurrence of this style of surface treatment <strong>in</strong> sites of thecontact period has not previously been reported <strong>in</strong> this general area,it is necessary to deal with these sherds <strong>in</strong> some detail and to broadenour comparative scope. In his classification of Alaskan pottery typesOswalt (1955) has recognized two categories of pottery decorated byexterior stamp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the form of checks; Nunivak Check Stampedand Norton Check Stamped. The latter is characterized by smallchecks 2 to 5 mm. <strong>in</strong> width, and is generally early <strong>in</strong> Alaska. It isfound at the Norton culture type site at Cape Denbigh <strong>in</strong> levels withradiocarbon dates of approximately 255 B.C. and 770 B.C. where itis predom<strong>in</strong>antly fiber and sand tempered (Griff<strong>in</strong>, 1953; Griff<strong>in</strong> andWilmeth, 1964, pp. 271-273; Dumond, 1965, p. 1244). The typealso occurs <strong>in</strong> the Naknek dra<strong>in</strong>age where it is tempered with sandand hair and has been recovered from levels dated by radiocarbonat approximately 160 B.C. and 50 a.d. (Dumond, 1965, p. 1244), and<strong>in</strong> sites at Chagvan Bay dated 150-300, 423-923, and 573-693 A.D.(Ackerman, 1964, p. 28). The latter ware is predom<strong>in</strong>ately hairtempered. Larsen (1950, pp. 181-183) also reports Norton CheckStamped ware from Chagvan Bay. At all these sites the ware is th<strong>in</strong>and well fired except at Chagvan Beach I where two k<strong>in</strong>ds of checkstamped sherds have been identified, one of which is thick and poorlyfired (Ackerman, 1964, p. 28). The only late occurrence of the Nortonform of check stamp<strong>in</strong>g, aside from the <strong>Tikchik</strong> site, is fromdeposits of the late pre-contact or post-contact age on Nunivak Island.Here the ware is predom<strong>in</strong>ately grass or sand and grass tempered(VanStone, 1954, pp. 182, 188).Nunivak Check Stamped pottery, which tends to be later, is characterizedby checks of large size that are square to rectangular <strong>in</strong>shape, up to 6 mm. <strong>in</strong> width, and often impressed on a thick, poorlyfired ware. This style of surface treatment was first described byColl<strong>in</strong>s from sherds found a foot below the surface near the ru<strong>in</strong>s ofthe wareold houses on Nunivak Island (Coll<strong>in</strong>s, 1928, pp. 254-256) ;has a "coarse rock temper and tends to exfoliate" (deLaguna, 1947,p. 229). Additional pottery, similar except for a f<strong>in</strong>er gravel andsand temper, was also recovered from late sites on Nunivak (Van-
- Page 2 and 3:
-;«.>*;>'-^!^fe'*«*w*^=LIBRARY OF
- Page 6 and 7:
. •>.. «-;•* - . Ti'-mtfT^-iif
- Page 12 and 13:
Ivan Ishnook, the last Tikchik surv
- Page 14 and 15:
Library of Congress Catalog Card Nu
- Page 16 and 17:
Listof IllustrationsIvan Ishnook, t
- Page 18 and 19:
216 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 20 and 21:
218
- Page 22 and 23:
c^^NtKushaqakfOdinochka-, Lake,.Lna
- Page 24 and 25:
Tikchik Village inHistoryThe meanin
- Page 26 and 27:
224 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 28 and 29:
226 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 30 and 31:
228 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 32 and 33:
230 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 34 and 35:
232
- Page 36 and 37:
234 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 38 and 39:
236 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 40 and 41:
238 FIELDIAN A: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUM
- Page 42 and 43:
240 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 44 and 45:
242 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 46 and 47:
244 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 48 and 49:
246 FIELDIANA: ANTHROLPOLOGY, VOLUM
- Page 50 and 51:
248 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 52 and 53:
25a FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 54 and 55:
252 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 56 and 57:
254 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 58 and 59:
256 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 60 and 61:
258 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 62 and 63:
260 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 64: 262 FIELDIANA: ANTHROPOLOGY, VOLUME
- Page 67 and 68: CollectionsIn this chapter the arti
- Page 69 and 70: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 267type i
- Page 71 and 72: Plate 3, Ground Stone and Antler Ar
- Page 73 and 74: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 271edge.
- Page 75 and 76: Plate 4. Bone and Antler Artifacts.
- Page 77 and 78: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 275isobvi
- Page 79 and 80: Plate 6. Bone, Antler, Bark and Lea
- Page 81 and 82: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 279One of
- Page 83 and 84: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 281is fla
- Page 85 and 86: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 283be not
- Page 87 and 88: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 285Thus t
- Page 89 and 90: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 287row sl
- Page 91 and 92: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 289of the
- Page 93 and 94: 14 15Plate 8. Metal, Glass and Impo
- Page 95 and 96: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 293have b
- Page 97 and 98: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 295Of the
- Page 99 and 100: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 297(Fonta
- Page 101 and 102: Plate 9. Metal Artifacts. 1. Ovate-
- Page 103 and 104: Plate 10. Metal Artifacts. 1. Flint
- Page 105 and 106: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 303barrel
- Page 107 and 108: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 305size n
- Page 109 and 110: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 307histor
- Page 111 and 112: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 309Crow V
- Page 113: ^ HIS--I rj 1-H ^1-H i-H (M 1-H --(
- Page 117 and 118: Plate lib. Locally-made Pottery. La
- Page 119 and 120: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 317Stone,
- Page 121 and 122: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 319Much m
- Page 123 and 124: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 321centur
- Page 125 and 126: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 323how pe
- Page 127 and 128: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 325River
- Page 129 and 130: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 327list j
- Page 131 and 132: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 329River
- Page 133 and 134: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 331suit o
- Page 135 and 136: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 333Bristo
- Page 137 and 138: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 335mercia
- Page 139 and 140: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 337estima
- Page 141 and 142: Spring and summerVANSTONE: TIKCHIK
- Page 143 and 144: Interpretations and ConclusionsThe
- Page 145 and 146: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 343United
- Page 147 and 148: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 345p. 230
- Page 149 and 150: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 347forest
- Page 151 and 152: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 349could,
- Page 153 and 154: them.VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 351T
- Page 155 and 156: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 353Cobb,
- Page 157 and 158: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 3551902.
- Page 159 and 160: VANSTONE: TIKCHIK VILLAGE 3571967.
- Page 161 and 162: (M 1-1 (M i-H 00 C^t«J1-4 t-^(M 1-
- Page 163 and 164: '—'4J'•c3o^ MoS =3 -^«—•CO
- Page 165 and 166:
g>'JSaCL,fiu
- Page 167 and 168:
-4->. 0)—t-H «D —ll-H.3(>J 1-1
- Page 169 and 170:
_^.c.a>'Ja.XIg^.c c C03o
- Page 174:
Publication 1057