protection <strong>and</strong> preservation <strong>of</strong> the marine environment). Much <strong>of</strong> Part XII focuses on sixcategories <strong>of</strong> pollution, 44 addressing for each one both st<strong>and</strong>ard setting <strong>and</strong> enforcement. Thispaper will focus on just three <strong>of</strong> these categories, referred to in Part XII as: (a) pollution fromseabed activities subject to national jurisdiction; (b) pollution from activities in the Area; <strong>and</strong> (c)pollution from vessels.3. Applying the Part XII framework to sources <strong>of</strong> ocean <strong>noise</strong>3.1 Pollution from seabed activities subject to national jurisdictionThis is addressed by Arts 208 & 214 LOSC. Art 208 LOSC deals with st<strong>and</strong>ard setting. Art208(1) LOSC states that:Coastal States shall adopt laws <strong>and</strong> regulations to prevent, reduce <strong>and</strong> control pollution <strong>of</strong> themarine environment arising from or in connection with seabed activities subject to theirjurisdiction <strong>and</strong> from artificial isl<strong>and</strong>s, installations <strong>and</strong> structures under their jurisdiction,pursuant to articles 60 <strong>and</strong> 80.This provision has two elements: (a) pollution “arising from or in connection with seabedactivities subject to their [i.e. the coastal States’] jurisdiction” <strong>and</strong> (b) pollution “arising ... fromartificial isl<strong>and</strong>s, installations <strong>and</strong> structures under their [i.e. the coastal States’] jurisdiction,pursuant to articles 60 <strong>and</strong> 80”. Regarding the former, the term “seabed activities” is not definedin the LOSC. For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this paper, it will be assumed to mean, inter alia, exploration<strong>and</strong> exploitation <strong>of</strong> the natural resources <strong>of</strong> the seabed <strong>and</strong> subsoil (e.g. oil <strong>and</strong> gas). 45 The term“subject to their jurisdiction” is also open to interpretation. For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this paper, it willbe assumed to mean activities occurring within zones that are under coastal State jurisdiction (i.e.,44 Pollution: (a) from l<strong>and</strong>-based sources; (b) from seabed activities subject to national jurisdiction; (c)from activities in the Area; (d) by dumping; (e) from vessels; <strong>and</strong> (f) from or through the atmosphere.45 This view is corroborated by Art 194(3)(c) LOSC which refers to “pollution from installations <strong>and</strong>devices used in exploration or exploitation <strong>of</strong> the natural resources <strong>of</strong> the seabed <strong>and</strong> subsoil”. (Note thatArt 77(4) LOSC provides that the term “natural resources” in the context <strong>of</strong> the legal continental shelfincludes not only non-living resources but also sedentary species. As such, the term “seabed activities” inrelation to the legal continental shelf could potentially also include exploration <strong>and</strong> exploitation <strong>of</strong>sedentary species.)103
inter alia, internal waters, the territorial sea, the exclusive economic zone (“EEZ”) <strong>and</strong> thecontinental shelf). 46 Art 208(1) LOSC requires that laws <strong>and</strong> regulations should be adopted notjust in relation to pollution “arising from” the seabed activities, but also in relation to pollution“in connection with” such activities.The second element <strong>of</strong> Art 208(1) LOSC refers to “artificial isl<strong>and</strong>s, installations <strong>and</strong> structures under their[i.e. the coastal States’] jurisdiction, pursuant to articles 60 <strong>and</strong> 80”. Though Art 80 LOSC refers to suchobjects “on the continental shelf”, Art 60 LOSC is much broader in scope. Art 60 LOSC relates to the EEZ(an area beyond <strong>and</strong> adjacent to the territorial sea but not extending beyond 200 nautical miles from thebaselines from which the breath <strong>of</strong> the territorial sea is measured 47 ). Under Art 60(1) LOSC, the coastalState has specified exclusive rights in the EEZ in relation to, inter alia, “installations <strong>and</strong> structures for thepurposes provided for in article 56 <strong>and</strong> other economic purposes”. Art 56 LOSC refers to, inter alia, “theproduction <strong>of</strong> energy from the water, currents <strong>and</strong> winds”. Thus it is arguable that Art 208(1) LOSC,despite the title <strong>of</strong> the article, 48 may be interpreted to include structures at the sea surface within the EEZfor, say, energy generation or fish farming. 49 This is relevant since such structures have potential togenerate ocean <strong>noise</strong>. 50Art 208(2) LOSC states that: “States shall take other measures as may be necessary to prevent,reduce <strong>and</strong> control such pollution”. This provision refers to States in general, rather than tocoastal States specifically. The meaning <strong>of</strong> “other measures” is not entirely clear. However, Art208(2) LOSC does refer to “such pollution”, i.e. the pollution described in Art 208(1) LOSC.One possible interpretation is therefore that, say, flag States <strong>of</strong> vessels operating under licence inthe coastal State’s zone (e.g. conducting seismic surveys or servicing installations) likewise havea duty to prevent, reduce <strong>and</strong> control the pollution. 51Art 208 LOSC also makes links to regional <strong>and</strong> global regimes. Under Art 208(3) LOSC, thelaws, regulations <strong>and</strong> measures referred to in Art 208(1) & (2) LOSC are to be “no less effective46 The basis for this view is that the LOSC has a separate provision (Art 209) that applies to “activities inthe Area” (i.e. all activities <strong>of</strong> exploration for, <strong>and</strong> exploitation <strong>of</strong>, the resources <strong>of</strong> the seabed <strong>and</strong> oceanfloor <strong>and</strong> subsoil there<strong>of</strong>, beyond the limits <strong>of</strong> national jurisdiction [see Art 1(1)(3) & (1) LOSC]).47 Arts 55 & 57 LOSC.48 The title <strong>of</strong> Art 208 LOSC is: “Pollution from seabed activities subject to national jurisdiction”.49 See also: S. Rosenne, A. Yankov & N.R. Gr<strong>and</strong>y (eds.), United Nations Convention on the Law <strong>of</strong> theSea 1982: A Commentary vol IV (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijh<strong>of</strong>f, 1991), p 226.50 E.g. see section 3.7.3 <strong>of</strong> the OSPAR Quality Status Report 2000 for the North-East Atlantic; available at:http://www.ospar.org (last visited 25.02.03).51 See also: S. Rosenne, A. Yankov & N.R. Gr<strong>and</strong>y (eds.), United Nations Convention on the Law <strong>of</strong> theSea 1982: A Commentary vol IV (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijh<strong>of</strong>f, 1991), pp 144 & 145.104
- Page 2:
Oceans of Noise 2004A WDCS Science
- Page 8 and 9:
In the US, the deployment of Low Fr
- Page 10 and 11:
its propagation beyond those declar
- Page 12 and 13:
The best evidence for noise being f
- Page 14 and 15:
Box 1. Characteristics of sound / l
- Page 16 and 17:
Sound speed (c)The speed (c) of a w
- Page 18 and 19:
Box 2. The effects of temperature,
- Page 20 and 21:
2.1.2. Measuring sound intensityIde
- Page 22 and 23:
i.e. Equal pressure measurements di
- Page 24 and 25:
Spherical or Geometrical spreading
- Page 28 and 29:
5.0 145Tug pulling loaded barge 1.0
- Page 30 and 31:
The source used during 3-D surveys
- Page 32 and 33:
Machinery noisePropulsion machinery
- Page 34 and 35:
Man-made islands /caissonsFixed pla
- Page 36 and 37:
12 3245Drill bit6Figure 3.4. Sound
- Page 38 and 39:
Transientnoise sourcesAircraftHelic
- Page 40 and 41:
Results from the aerial surveys con
- Page 42 and 43:
haemorrhaging in the inner ears and
- Page 44 and 45:
However they also noted that whales
- Page 46 and 47:
4. The Use of Sound by CetaceansChr
- Page 48 and 49:
seems logical, therefore, that if t
- Page 50 and 51:
However, despite the reported low a
- Page 52 and 53:
Kamminga and Wiersma 1981;Akamatsu
- Page 54 and 55: SongSocial callsShrieksSlaps0.03-80
- Page 56 and 57: anthropogenic factors that make the
- Page 58 and 59: 5.3 Longer-term impactsNoise is cle
- Page 60 and 61: 5.4 Indirect impactsThe above impac
- Page 62 and 63: decompression sickness (DCS) as see
- Page 64 and 65: 6. Examples of regional and nationa
- Page 66 and 67: 6.3 ASCOBANS and ACCOBAMSTwo region
- Page 68 and 69: implications and the discussion sho
- Page 70 and 71: 7.1. Consideration of Voluntary vs.
- Page 72 and 73: acoustic measurements have been mad
- Page 74 and 75: 7.6. Methods of protectionComplianc
- Page 76 and 77: 7.6.1 Monitoring7.6.1.1 Visual, aco
- Page 78 and 79: Delory et al. (2002) use Ambient No
- Page 80 and 81: 8. ReferencesAburto, A., Rountry, D
- Page 82 and 83: Caldwell, M.C., Caldwell, D.K., and
- Page 84 and 85: Engas, A., Lokkeborg, S., Ona, E. a
- Page 86 and 87: IWC 2002b. Report of the Scientific
- Page 88 and 89: McCauley, R.D. 1994. Seismic Survey
- Page 90 and 91: Potter, J. and Delory, E. 2001. Noi
- Page 92 and 93: Smolker, R.A., Mann, J. and Smuts,
- Page 94 and 95: Watkins, W.A. 1981b. The activities
- Page 96 and 97: ANNEX 1The Application of Marine Po
- Page 98 and 99: an important factor. 13 The judgeme
- Page 100 and 101: in the preparatory work of the LOSC
- Page 102 and 103: practice by the UNEP Governing Coun
- Page 106 and 107: than international rules, standards
- Page 108 and 109: Four of the twelve regional seas tr
- Page 110 and 111: seismic operations in the Protocol
- Page 112 and 113: ConclusionAt the global level, only
- Page 114 and 115: Art 209 LOSC focuses on both standa
- Page 116 and 117: No State Party may impose condition
- Page 118 and 119: coastal States”. This formulation
- Page 120 and 121: If the IMO makes this determination
- Page 122 and 123: estrictions to vessels operating in
- Page 124 and 125: In the EEZ, in comparison to the te
- Page 126 and 127: Appendix A - Some international ins
- Page 128 and 129: Convention for the Protection of th
- Page 130 and 131: Available at:http://www.unep.ch/sea
- Page 132 and 133: BucharestConventionArticle XIPollut
- Page 134 and 135: environment1. The Contracting Parti
- Page 136 and 137: - that under Article III.8.c) of AC
- Page 138 and 139: e) no sudden or repeated change in
- Page 140 and 141: Ref: Nowacek et al. 2001.Location:
- Page 142 and 143: Location: Arctic• Vocal behaviour
- Page 144 and 145: • Vaquita surfacing duration and
- Page 146 and 147: • 6% of small delphinids (n=264;
- Page 148 and 149: Species type: Boto, Inia geoffrensi
- Page 150 and 151: • Humpback whales appeared tolera
- Page 152 and 153: • Behaviour interpreted as aggres
- Page 154 and 155:
• There was no evidence of minke
- Page 156 and 157:
• Northern right whales may be ap
- Page 158 and 159:
• Migrating gray whales disturbed
- Page 160 and 161:
to Ensenada De La Paz, Mexico. Aqua
- Page 162 and 163:
distribution of humpback whales, Me
- Page 164 and 165:
Richardson, C.R. Greene, C.I. Malme
- Page 166 and 167:
Zhou, K., Pilleri, G. and Li, Y. 19
- Page 168 and 169:
6. surveys for Cuvier’s beaked wh