8. ReferencesAburto, A., Rountry, D. J. <strong>and</strong> Danzer, J. L. 1997. Behavioural responses <strong>of</strong> blue whales to active signals. Technicalreport 1746. Naval Comm<strong>and</strong>, Control <strong>and</strong> Ocean Surveillance Centre, RDT&E Division, San Diego, CA 92152-5001.Akamatsu, T., Hatakeyaman Y., Kojima, T. <strong>and</strong> Soeda, H. 1994. Echolocation rates <strong>of</strong> two harbor porpoises (Phocoenaphocoena). Marine Mammal Science 10: 401-411.André, M. <strong>and</strong> Degollada, E. 2003 Effects <strong>of</strong> shipping <strong>noise</strong> on sperm whale populations. Poster presented at theEuropean Cetacean <strong>Society</strong> Conference, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, March 2003.Andre, M. <strong>and</strong> Potter, J.R. 2001. Potential mitigation <strong>of</strong> fast-ferries acoustic <strong>and</strong> direct physical impact on cetaceans:towards a sustainable development <strong>of</strong> modern shipping. A workshop on the problem <strong>of</strong> cetacean collisions in theMediterranean Sea has been organized by the Tethys Research Institute during the 15th Annual Conference <strong>of</strong> theEuropean Cetacean <strong>Society</strong> (Rome, Italy, 6-10 May 2001).ANZECC, 2000. Australian National Guidelines for Cetacean Observation. Published by Environment Australia. 13pages.ASCOBANS 2002. Website: http://www.ascobans.org/index0501.html Last visited 19/3/2002Au, W.W.L. 1993. The sonar <strong>of</strong> dolphins. Springer-Verlag, New York. 277pp.Au, W.W.L., Floyd, R.W., Penner, R.H. <strong>and</strong> Murchison, A.E. 1974. Measurement <strong>of</strong> echolocation signals <strong>of</strong> theAtlantic bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus Montagu, in open waters. Journal <strong>of</strong> the Acoustical <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> America56: 1280-1290.Au, W.W.L., Carder, D.A., Penner, R.H. <strong>and</strong> Scronce, B. 1985. Demonstration <strong>of</strong> adaptation in Beluga whaleecholocation signals. Journal <strong>of</strong> the Acoustical <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> America 77: 726-730.Au, W.W.L., Penner, R.H. <strong>and</strong> Turl, C.W. 1987. Propagation <strong>of</strong> beluga echolocation signals. Journal <strong>of</strong> the Acoustical<strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> America82: 807-813.Au, W.W.L., Nachtigall, P.E. <strong>and</strong> Pawloski, J.L. 1997. Acoustic effects <strong>of</strong> the ATOC signal (75Hz; 195 dB) ondolphins <strong>and</strong> whales. Journal <strong>of</strong> the Acoustical <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> America 104: 2273-2275.Awbrey, F.T., Thomas, J.A., Evans, W.E. <strong>and</strong> Leatherwood, S. 1982. Ross Sea killer whale vocalizations: Preliminarydescription <strong>and</strong> comparison with those <strong>of</strong> some Northern Hemisphere killer whales. Reports <strong>of</strong> the InternationalWhaling Commission 32: 667-670.Awbrey, F.T., Thomas, J.A. <strong>and</strong> Kastelein, R.A. 1988. Low frequency underwater hearing sensitivity in belugas;Delphinapterus leucas. Journal <strong>of</strong> the Acoustical <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> America 84: 2273-2275.Backus, R.H. <strong>and</strong> Schevill, W.E. 1966. Physeter clicks. In <strong>Whale</strong>s, <strong>Dolphin</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Porpoises (ed. K.S. Norris), pp. 510-527. University <strong>of</strong> California Press, Berkeley, California.Bain, D. E. 2002. A model linking energetic effects <strong>of</strong> whale watching to killer whale Orcinus orca populationdynamics.Bain, D. E. <strong>and</strong> Dahlheim, M. E. 1994. Effects <strong>of</strong> masking <strong>noise</strong> on detection thresholds <strong>of</strong> killer whales. In (T. R.Loughlin Ed.) Marine Mammals <strong>and</strong> the Exxon Valdez. Academic Press NY. 243-256.Balcomb, K.C. <strong>and</strong> Claridge. D.E. 2001. A mass str<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> cetaceans caused by naval sonar in the Bahamas.Bahamas Journal <strong>of</strong> Science 8(2): 1-12.Banner, P.J. <strong>and</strong> Hyatt, M. 1973. Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>noise</strong> on eggs <strong>and</strong> larvae <strong>of</strong> two estuarine fishes. Transactions <strong>of</strong> theAmerican Fisheries <strong>Society</strong> 108: 134-6.Barton, C. J. S. 2001. Current Marine Mammal Detection Practices. Presented at the Acoustic Detection <strong>of</strong> MarineMammals in the Offshore Oil <strong>and</strong> Gas Industry. 5 pages.79
Baur, D.C., M.J. Bean, M.L. Gosliner. 1999. The laws governing marine mammal conservation in the United States. In:Twiss, J.R. Jnr <strong>and</strong> R.R. Reeves (Eds) <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>and</strong> Management <strong>of</strong> Marine Mammals. Smithsonian InstitutionalPress. Washington <strong>and</strong> London.Berzin, A. 1972. The Sperm <strong>Whale</strong>. Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem.Bondaryk, J. E. 2001. Benefits <strong>and</strong> limitations <strong>of</strong> active sonar for marine mammal risk mitigation.http://www.tethys.org/collisionworkshop.htmBorggaard, D., Lien, J. <strong>and</strong> Stevick, P. 1999. Assessing the effects <strong>of</strong> industrial activity on large cetaceans in TrinityBay, Newfoundl<strong>and</strong> (1992-1995). Aquatic Mammals 25: 149-161.Bowles, A. E., Smultea, M. <strong>and</strong> Würsig, B., DeMaster, D. P. <strong>and</strong> Palka, D. 1994. Relative abundance <strong>and</strong> behaviour <strong>of</strong>marine mammals exposed to transmissions from the Heard Isl<strong>and</strong> Feasibility Test. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96 (4): 2469-2484.Brodie, D.A. <strong>and</strong> Hanson, H.M. 1960. A study <strong>of</strong> the factors involved in the production <strong>of</strong> gastric ulcers by the restrainttechnique. Gastroenterology 38: 353-360.Bryant, P.J., Lafferty, C.M. <strong>and</strong> Lafferty, S.K. 1984. Reoccupation <strong>of</strong> Laguna Guerrero Negro, Baja California,Mexico, by gray whales. In The Gray <strong>Whale</strong>, Eschrichtius robustus (ed. M.L. Jones et al.), pp. 375-387. AcademicPress, Orl<strong>and</strong>o, Florida. 600pp.Bryden, M.M. <strong>and</strong> Molyneux, G.S. 1986. Ultrastructure <strong>of</strong> encapsulated mechanoreceptor organs in the region <strong>of</strong> thenares. In Research on <strong>Dolphin</strong>s (ed. M.M.Bryden <strong>and</strong> R. Harrison), pp. 99-107. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Buck, B.M. <strong>and</strong> Chalfant, D.A. 1972. Deep water narrowb<strong>and</strong> radiated <strong>noise</strong> measurement <strong>of</strong> merchant ships. DelcoTR72-28. Santa Barbara, California: Delco Electronics. 30pp.Busnel, R.-G. <strong>and</strong> Dziedic, A. 1966. Acoustic signals <strong>of</strong> the pilot whale Globicephala melaena <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the porpoisesDelphinus delphis <strong>and</strong> Phocoena phocoena. In <strong>Whale</strong>s, dolphins <strong>and</strong> porpoises (ed. K.S. Norris), pp. 607-646.University <strong>of</strong> California Press, Berkeley.Busnel, R.-G. <strong>and</strong> Dziedic, A. 1968. Caractéristiques physiques de certains signaux acoustiques du delphididé Stenobredanensis, Lesson. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Séries D 262: 143-146.Busnel, R.G., Dziedzic, A. <strong>and</strong> Andersen, S. 1965. Rôle de l’impédance d’une cible dans le seuil de sa détection par lesystème sonar du marsouin P. phocaena. C.R. Séances Soc. Biol. 159: 69-74.Calambokidis, J., Ch<strong>and</strong>ler, T.E., Costa, D.P., Clark, C.W., <strong>and</strong> H. Whitehead. 1998. Effects <strong>of</strong> the ATOC soundsource on the distribution <strong>of</strong> marine mammals observed from aerial surveys <strong>of</strong>f central California. The World MarineMammal Science Conference Abstracts, 20-24 Jan. 1998, Monaco.Caldwell, D.K., Caldwell, M.C. <strong>and</strong> Miller, J.F. 1969. Three brief narrow-b<strong>and</strong> sound emissions by a captive maleRisso’s dolphin, Grampus griseus. Los Angeles County Museum Natural History Foundation Technical Report 5. 6pp.Caldwell, M.C. <strong>and</strong> Caldwell, D.K. 1965. Individualized whistle contours in bottlenosed dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).Science 207: 434-435.Caldwell, M.C. <strong>and</strong> Caldwell, D.K. 1967. Intraspecific transfer <strong>of</strong> information via pulsed sound in captive odontocetecetaceans. In Animal Sonar Systems: Biology <strong>and</strong> Bionics II (ed. R.-G. Busnel), pp. 879-937. Laboratoire dePhysiologie Acoustique, Jouy-en-Josas, France.Caldwell, M.C. <strong>and</strong> Caldwell. D.K. 1968. Vocalizations <strong>of</strong> native captive dolphins in small groups. Science 159: 1121-1123.Caldwell, D.K <strong>and</strong> Caldwell, M.C. 1987. Underwater echolocation-type clicks by captive str<strong>and</strong>ed pygmy spermwhales, Kogia breviceps. In Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 7 th Biennial Conference on the Biology <strong>of</strong> Marine Mammals, Miami,Florida, December 1987. p 8. <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> Marine Mammalogy, Pacific Grove, California.80
- Page 2:
Oceans of Noise 2004A WDCS Science
- Page 8 and 9:
In the US, the deployment of Low Fr
- Page 10 and 11:
its propagation beyond those declar
- Page 12 and 13:
The best evidence for noise being f
- Page 14 and 15:
Box 1. Characteristics of sound / l
- Page 16 and 17:
Sound speed (c)The speed (c) of a w
- Page 18 and 19:
Box 2. The effects of temperature,
- Page 20 and 21:
2.1.2. Measuring sound intensityIde
- Page 22 and 23:
i.e. Equal pressure measurements di
- Page 24 and 25:
Spherical or Geometrical spreading
- Page 28 and 29:
5.0 145Tug pulling loaded barge 1.0
- Page 30 and 31: The source used during 3-D surveys
- Page 32 and 33: Machinery noisePropulsion machinery
- Page 34 and 35: Man-made islands /caissonsFixed pla
- Page 36 and 37: 12 3245Drill bit6Figure 3.4. Sound
- Page 38 and 39: Transientnoise sourcesAircraftHelic
- Page 40 and 41: Results from the aerial surveys con
- Page 42 and 43: haemorrhaging in the inner ears and
- Page 44 and 45: However they also noted that whales
- Page 46 and 47: 4. The Use of Sound by CetaceansChr
- Page 48 and 49: seems logical, therefore, that if t
- Page 50 and 51: However, despite the reported low a
- Page 52 and 53: Kamminga and Wiersma 1981;Akamatsu
- Page 54 and 55: SongSocial callsShrieksSlaps0.03-80
- Page 56 and 57: anthropogenic factors that make the
- Page 58 and 59: 5.3 Longer-term impactsNoise is cle
- Page 60 and 61: 5.4 Indirect impactsThe above impac
- Page 62 and 63: decompression sickness (DCS) as see
- Page 64 and 65: 6. Examples of regional and nationa
- Page 66 and 67: 6.3 ASCOBANS and ACCOBAMSTwo region
- Page 68 and 69: implications and the discussion sho
- Page 70 and 71: 7.1. Consideration of Voluntary vs.
- Page 72 and 73: acoustic measurements have been mad
- Page 74 and 75: 7.6. Methods of protectionComplianc
- Page 76 and 77: 7.6.1 Monitoring7.6.1.1 Visual, aco
- Page 78 and 79: Delory et al. (2002) use Ambient No
- Page 82 and 83: Caldwell, M.C., Caldwell, D.K., and
- Page 84 and 85: Engas, A., Lokkeborg, S., Ona, E. a
- Page 86 and 87: IWC 2002b. Report of the Scientific
- Page 88 and 89: McCauley, R.D. 1994. Seismic Survey
- Page 90 and 91: Potter, J. and Delory, E. 2001. Noi
- Page 92 and 93: Smolker, R.A., Mann, J. and Smuts,
- Page 94 and 95: Watkins, W.A. 1981b. The activities
- Page 96 and 97: ANNEX 1The Application of Marine Po
- Page 98 and 99: an important factor. 13 The judgeme
- Page 100 and 101: in the preparatory work of the LOSC
- Page 102 and 103: practice by the UNEP Governing Coun
- Page 104 and 105: protection and preservation of the
- Page 106 and 107: than international rules, standards
- Page 108 and 109: Four of the twelve regional seas tr
- Page 110 and 111: seismic operations in the Protocol
- Page 112 and 113: ConclusionAt the global level, only
- Page 114 and 115: Art 209 LOSC focuses on both standa
- Page 116 and 117: No State Party may impose condition
- Page 118 and 119: coastal States”. This formulation
- Page 120 and 121: If the IMO makes this determination
- Page 122 and 123: estrictions to vessels operating in
- Page 124 and 125: In the EEZ, in comparison to the te
- Page 126 and 127: Appendix A - Some international ins
- Page 128 and 129: Convention for the Protection of th
- Page 130 and 131:
Available at:http://www.unep.ch/sea
- Page 132 and 133:
BucharestConventionArticle XIPollut
- Page 134 and 135:
environment1. The Contracting Parti
- Page 136 and 137:
- that under Article III.8.c) of AC
- Page 138 and 139:
e) no sudden or repeated change in
- Page 140 and 141:
Ref: Nowacek et al. 2001.Location:
- Page 142 and 143:
Location: Arctic• Vocal behaviour
- Page 144 and 145:
• Vaquita surfacing duration and
- Page 146 and 147:
• 6% of small delphinids (n=264;
- Page 148 and 149:
Species type: Boto, Inia geoffrensi
- Page 150 and 151:
• Humpback whales appeared tolera
- Page 152 and 153:
• Behaviour interpreted as aggres
- Page 154 and 155:
• There was no evidence of minke
- Page 156 and 157:
• Northern right whales may be ap
- Page 158 and 159:
• Migrating gray whales disturbed
- Page 160 and 161:
to Ensenada De La Paz, Mexico. Aqua
- Page 162 and 163:
distribution of humpback whales, Me
- Page 164 and 165:
Richardson, C.R. Greene, C.I. Malme
- Page 166 and 167:
Zhou, K., Pilleri, G. and Li, Y. 19
- Page 168 and 169:
6. surveys for Cuvier’s beaked wh