Oceans of noise - Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society

More documents

Recommendations

Info

McCauley, R.D. 1994. Seismic Surveys. In Environmental implications of offshore oil and gas development inAustralia. The findings of an independent scientific review (ed. J.M. Swan, J.M. Neff and P.C. Young), pp. 19-121. TheAustralian Petroleum Exploration Association and Energy Research and Development Corporation. 696pp.Miles, P.R., Malme, C.I. and Richardson, W.J. 1989. Prediction of drilling site-specific interaction of industrialacoustic stimuli and endangered whales in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. OCS Study MMS 87-0084. BBN Report No.6509. BBN Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts. 341pp.Miller, P.J., Biassoni, N., Samuels, A., and Tyack, P.L. 2000. Whale songs lengthen in response to sonar. Nature 405(6789). p 903.Miller, D. and Williams, A. 1983. Further investigations of ATP release from human erythrocytes exposed toultrasonically activated gas-filled pores. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 9: 303.Minerals Management Services, 2001. www.mms.gov.Mitson, R.B. 1990. Very-high-frequency acoustic emissions from the white-beaked dolphin (Lagenorhynchusalbirostris). In Sensory Abilities of Cetaceans. Laboratory and Field Evidence (ed. J.A. Thomas and R.A. Kastelein),pp. 283-294. Plenum Press, New York. 710pp.Moberg, G.P. 1985. Influence of stress on reproduction: a measure of well-being. In Animal Stress (ed. G.P. Moberg),pp 245-268. American Physiological Society, Bethesda.Møhl, B. 2003. Presentation to Active Sonar workshop at the European Cetacean Society Conference, Gran Canarias,Canary Islands.Møhl, B. and Andersen, S. 1973. Echolocation: high-frequency component in the click of the harbour porpoise(Phocoena ph. L.). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54: 1368-1372.Møhl, B., Surlykke, A. and Miller, L.A. 1990. High intensity narwhal clicks. In Sensory Abilities of Cetaceans:Laboratory and Field Evidence (ed. J.A. Thomas and R.A. Kastelein), pp. 295-303. Plenum Press, New York.Moore, S.E. and Ljungblad, D.K. 1984. Gray whales in the Beaufort, Chukchi, and Bearing seas: distribution and soundproduction. In The Gray Whale, Eschrichtius robustus (S.L. Swartz and S. Leatherwood), pp. 543-559. Academic Press,Orlando, Florida.Moore, S.E. and Ridgeway, S.H. 1995. Whistles produced by common dolphins from the southern California Bight.Aquatic Mammals 21: 55-63.Moore, S.E., Francine, J.K., Bowles, A.E. and Ford, J.K.B. 1988. Analysis of calls of killer whales, Orcinus orca, fromIceland and Norway. Rit Fisk. 11: 225-2250.Morton, A. B. and Symonds, H. K. 2002. Displacement of orcinus orca by high amplitude sound in British Columbia,Canada. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 59: 71-80.Morton, A. 1995. Salmon Farming’s Hidden Harm. Paper presented at Aquaculture briefing, Smithsonian Institute,Washington, DC, June 1995.Morton, A.B., Gale, J.C. and Prince, R.C. 1986. Sound and behavioral correlations in captive Orcinus orca. InBehavioral Ecology of Killer Whales (ed. B.C. Kirkevold and J.S. Lockard), pp. 303-333. Alan R. Liss, New York.457pp.Moscrop, A. & Swift, R. 1999. Atlantic Frontier Cetaceans: Recent research on distribution, ecology and impacts, AReport to Greenpeace UK, March 1999.Moscrop, A. 1997. Cetaceans of the North East Atlantic Fringe. Unpublished report to Greenpeace (UK).Nachtigall, P.E., Au, W.W.L., Lemonds, D. and Roitblat, H.L. 1998. Hearing and noise in odontocetes. In Abstracts ofthe world marine Mammal Conference, Monaco, 20-24 January 1998. p. 96. Society for Marine Mammalogy/EuropeanCetacean Society, La Rochelle, France. 160pp.87
National Research Council. 2000. Marine Mammals and Low Frequency Sound: Progress since 1994. NationalAcademy Press, Washington D.C.National Marine Fisheries Service 2002. Website of the office of Protected Resources:http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prot_res/laws/MMPA/MMPA.html#Marine%20Mammal%20Protection%20Act%20Text%20Table%20of%20ContentsNMFS. 2002. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prot_res/readingrm/MMSURTASS/LFAexecsummary.PDF. Last accessedMay 9th, 2003.NOAA. 1996. Acoustic Deterrence of Harmful Marine Mammal-Fishery Interactions: Proceedings of a Workshop heldin Seattle, Washington, 20-22 March 1996.Norris, J.C. and Leatherwood, S. 1981. Hearing in the bowhead whale, Balaena mysticetus, as estimated by cochlearmorphology. Hubbs Sea World Research Institute Technical Report 81-132: 15.1-15.49.Norris, K.S. 1969. The echolocation of marine mammals. In The Biology of Marine Mammals (ed. H.J. Andersen), pp.391-423. Academic Press, New York.Norris, K.S. and Møhl, B. 1983. Can odontocetes debilitate prey with sound? American Naturalist 122: 85-104.Norris, K.S., Goodman, R.M., Villa-Ramirez, B. and Hobbs, L. 1977. Behavior of Californian gray whale, Eschrichtiusrobustus, in southern Baja California, Mexico. Fishery Bulletin 75: 159-172.Norris, T.F. 1994. Effects of boat noise on the acoustic behavior of humpback whales. Journal of the Acoustical Societyof America 43: 383-384.NZ, 1996. Report of the Cetacean Acoustic Assessment Workshop. Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.Olesiuk, P.F., Nichol, L.M., Sowden, P.J. and Ford, J.K.B. 1995. Effects of Sounds Generated by an Acoustic DeterrentDevice on the Abundance and Distribution of Harbour Porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) in Retreat Passage, BritishColumbia. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Pacific Biological Station, Nanimo, B.C.Osborne, R.W. (1991). Trends in killer whale movements, vessel traffic, and whale watching in Haro Strait. PugetSound Research ‘91 Proceedings, Seattle, WA.Palmer, E. and Weddell, G. 1964. The relationship between structure, innervation and skin of the bottlenose dolphin(Tursiops truncatus). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 143: 553-568.Parsons, E.C.M., Birks, I., Evans, P.G.H., Gordon, J.G., Shrimpton, J.H. and Pooley, S. 2000. The possible impacts ofmilitary activity on cetaceans in West Scotland. European Research on Cetaceans 14: 185-190.Payne, K. and Payne, R. 1985. Large scale changes over 19 years in songs of humpback whales in Bermuda. Zeitschriftfür Tierpsychologie 68: 89-114.Payne, R.S. and Webb, D. 1971. Orientation by means of long range acoustic signaling in baleen whales. Annals of theNew York Academy of Science 188: 110-141.Payne, K.B., Tyack, P. and Payne, R.S. 1983. Progressive changes in the songs of humpback whales (Megapteranovaeangliae). In Communication and Behavior of Whales (ed. R. Payne), pp. 9-57. AAAS Selected Symposium 76.Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Pierson M, Wagner J, Langford V, Birnie P & Tasker M. 1998. Protection for, and mitigation of, the potential effects ofseismic exploration on marine mammals, Seismic and Marine Mammals Workshop, London.Perry, C. 1998. A review of the impact of anthropogenic noise on cetaceans. Paper presented to the ScientificCommittee at the 50 th Meeting of the International Whaling Commission, 1998. SC/50/E9.Phillips, N.E., and R.W. Baird. (1993). Are killer whales harassed by boats? Victoria Naturalist 50(3):10-11.88
Page 2:
Oceans of Noise 2004A WDCS Science
Page 8 and 9:
In the US, the deployment of Low Fr
Page 10 and 11:
its propagation beyond those declar
Page 12 and 13:
The best evidence for noise being f
Page 14 and 15:
Box 1. Characteristics of sound / l
Page 16 and 17:
Sound speed (c)The speed (c) of a w
Page 18 and 19:
Box 2. The effects of temperature,
Page 20 and 21:
2.1.2. Measuring sound intensityIde
Page 22 and 23:
i.e. Equal pressure measurements di
Page 24 and 25:
Spherical or Geometrical spreading
Page 28 and 29:
5.0 145Tug pulling loaded barge 1.0
Page 30 and 31:
The source used during 3-D surveys
Page 32 and 33:
Machinery noisePropulsion machinery
Page 34 and 35:
Man-made islands /caissonsFixed pla
Page 36 and 37:
12 3245Drill bit6Figure 3.4. Sound
Page 38 and 39: Transientnoise sourcesAircraftHelic
Page 40 and 41: Results from the aerial surveys con
Page 42 and 43: haemorrhaging in the inner ears and
Page 44 and 45: However they also noted that whales
Page 46 and 47: 4. The Use of Sound by CetaceansChr
Page 48 and 49: seems logical, therefore, that if t
Page 50 and 51: However, despite the reported low a
Page 52 and 53: Kamminga and Wiersma 1981;Akamatsu
Page 54 and 55: SongSocial callsShrieksSlaps0.03-80
Page 56 and 57: anthropogenic factors that make the
Page 58 and 59: 5.3 Longer-term impactsNoise is cle
Page 60 and 61: 5.4 Indirect impactsThe above impac
Page 62 and 63: decompression sickness (DCS) as see
Page 64 and 65: 6. Examples of regional and nationa
Page 66 and 67: 6.3 ASCOBANS and ACCOBAMSTwo region
Page 68 and 69: implications and the discussion sho
Page 70 and 71: 7.1. Consideration of Voluntary vs.
Page 72 and 73: acoustic measurements have been mad
Page 74 and 75: 7.6. Methods of protectionComplianc
Page 76 and 77: 7.6.1 Monitoring7.6.1.1 Visual, aco
Page 78 and 79: Delory et al. (2002) use Ambient No
Page 80 and 81: 8. ReferencesAburto, A., Rountry, D
Page 82 and 83: Caldwell, M.C., Caldwell, D.K., and
Page 84 and 85: Engas, A., Lokkeborg, S., Ona, E. a
Page 86 and 87: IWC 2002b. Report of the Scientific
Page 90 and 91: Potter, J. and Delory, E. 2001. Noi
Page 92 and 93: Smolker, R.A., Mann, J. and Smuts,
Page 94 and 95: Watkins, W.A. 1981b. The activities
Page 96 and 97: ANNEX 1The Application of Marine Po
Page 98 and 99: an important factor. 13 The judgeme
Page 100 and 101: in the preparatory work of the LOSC
Page 102 and 103: practice by the UNEP Governing Coun
Page 104 and 105: protection and preservation of the
Page 106 and 107: than international rules, standards
Page 108 and 109: Four of the twelve regional seas tr
Page 110 and 111: seismic operations in the Protocol
Page 112 and 113: ConclusionAt the global level, only
Page 114 and 115: Art 209 LOSC focuses on both standa
Page 116 and 117: No State Party may impose condition
Page 118 and 119: coastal States”. This formulation
Page 120 and 121: If the IMO makes this determination
Page 122 and 123: estrictions to vessels operating in
Page 124 and 125: In the EEZ, in comparison to the te
Page 126 and 127: Appendix A - Some international ins
Page 128 and 129: Convention for the Protection of th
Page 130 and 131: Available at:http://www.unep.ch/sea
Page 132 and 133: BucharestConventionArticle XIPollut
Page 134 and 135: environment1. The Contracting Parti
Page 136 and 137: - that under Article III.8.c) of AC
Page 138 and 139:
e) no sudden or repeated change in
Page 140 and 141:
Ref: Nowacek et al. 2001.Location:
Page 142 and 143:
Location: Arctic• Vocal behaviour
Page 144 and 145:
• Vaquita surfacing duration and
Page 146 and 147:
• 6% of small delphinids (n=264;
Page 148 and 149:
Species type: Boto, Inia geoffrensi
Page 150 and 151:
• Humpback whales appeared tolera
Page 152 and 153:
• Behaviour interpreted as aggres
Page 154 and 155:
• There was no evidence of minke
Page 156 and 157:
• Northern right whales may be ap
Page 158 and 159:
• Migrating gray whales disturbed
Page 160 and 161:
to Ensenada De La Paz, Mexico. Aqua
Page 162 and 163:
distribution of humpback whales, Me
Page 164 and 165:
Richardson, C.R. Greene, C.I. Malme
Page 166 and 167:
Zhou, K., Pilleri, G. and Li, Y. 19
Page 168 and 169:
6. surveys for Cuvier’s beaked wh
show all

Oceans of noise - Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?