ANNEX 1The Application <strong>of</strong> Marine Pollution Law to Ocean NoiseDaniel Owen 51. IntroductionThis paper addresses the application <strong>of</strong> marine pollution law to the regulation <strong>of</strong> ocean <strong>noise</strong>. Ofcourse, other categories <strong>of</strong> law may also be <strong>of</strong> assistance in the regulation <strong>of</strong> ocean <strong>noise</strong>, but forreasons <strong>of</strong> space it is not possible to address these here. 6 Likewise, it will not be possible toaddress relevant principles <strong>of</strong> international environmental law, despite the clear importance in thiscontext <strong>of</strong> matters such as the precautionary principle.2. Global instruments on marine pollution2.1 The United Nations Convention on the Law <strong>of</strong> the SeaThe 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law <strong>of</strong> the Sea (“the LOSC”) 7 establishes duties onits contracting parties in respect <strong>of</strong> pollution <strong>of</strong> the marine environment “from any source”. 8 Thenature <strong>of</strong> these duties will be discussed in more detail below. At this point, it is appropriate to5 Barrister, Fenners Chambers, 3 Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0EE, Engl<strong>and</strong>, UK (e-mail:daniel.owen@fennerschambers.co.uk). Copyright <strong>of</strong> the material in this paper rests with the author; theauthor in turn gives permission to the <strong>Whale</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Dolphin</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Society</strong> to publish the said material,in print <strong>and</strong> electronic format, in this report. The author would like to thank Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Robin Churchill(University <strong>of</strong> Wales, Cardiff) for comments on a previous draft <strong>of</strong> this paper.6 Nevertheless, Appendix A <strong>of</strong> this paper lists some international instruments <strong>of</strong> actual or potentialrelevance to protection <strong>of</strong> cetaceans from ocean <strong>noise</strong>, other than specifically in relation to pollution. Fordiscussion <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> these instruments in relation to ocean <strong>noise</strong>, see: H.M. Dotinga & A.G.Oude Elferink, Acoustic Pollution in the <strong>Oceans</strong>: The Search for Legal St<strong>and</strong>ards, Ocean Development &International Law, 31: 151-182, 2000, pp 166-170.7 Available at: http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm(last visited 25.02.03).95
consider just the definition <strong>of</strong> pollution in the treaty. Art 1(1)(4) LOSC states that:“pollution <strong>of</strong> the marine environment” means the introduction by man, directly or indirectly,<strong>of</strong> substances or energy into the marine environment, including estuaries, which results or islikely to result in such deleterious effects as harm to living resources <strong>and</strong> marine life, hazardsto human health, hindrance to marine activities, including fishing <strong>and</strong> other legitimate uses <strong>of</strong>the sea, impairment <strong>of</strong> quality for use <strong>of</strong> sea water <strong>and</strong> reduction <strong>of</strong> amenities; [Emphasisadded]It is necessary to decide whether the term “energy” in Art 1(1)(4) LOSC may be interpreted toinclude energy in the form <strong>of</strong> human-induced ocean <strong>noise</strong>. Art 31 (“General rule <strong>of</strong>interpretation”) <strong>of</strong> the Vienna Convention 9 states in paragraph 1 that “[a] treaty shall beinterpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms <strong>of</strong> thetreaty in their context <strong>and</strong> in the light <strong>of</strong> its object <strong>and</strong> purpose”. Context comprises, inter alia,the treaty’s text including its preamble. 10 In the current case, context is provided, inter alia, bythe setting <strong>of</strong> the term “energy” within a definition <strong>of</strong> pollution, <strong>and</strong> by the subsequent use <strong>of</strong> theterm “pollution” in the LOSC (in particular in Part XII). Furthermore, the preamble to the LOSCrefers to, inter alia, “the desire to settle ... all issues relating to the law <strong>of</strong> the sea” <strong>and</strong> to “thedesirability <strong>of</strong> establishing through this Convention ... a legal order for the seas <strong>and</strong> oceans ...”.On the basis <strong>of</strong> this evidence, it is strongly arguable that human-induced ocean <strong>noise</strong> should beincluded within the ordinary meaning <strong>of</strong> “energy” in Art 1(1)(4) LOSC.Art 31(3)(b) <strong>of</strong> the Vienna Convention states that “[t]here shall be taken into account, togetherwith the context ... any subsequent practice in the application <strong>of</strong> the treaty which establishes theagreement <strong>of</strong> the parties regarding its interpretation”. 11 Sinclair states that Art 31(3)(b) “does notcover subsequent practice in general, but only a specific form <strong>of</strong> subsequent practice - that is tosay, concordant subsequent practice common to all the parties”. 12 Consistency <strong>of</strong> practice is also8 Art 194(1) LOSC; see also Art 194(3) LOSC.9 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law <strong>of</strong> Treaties; available at:http://fletcher.tufts.edu/multi/texts/BH538.txt (last visited 25.02.03).10 Art 31(2).11 Art 31(3)(b).12 I. Sinclair, The Vienna Convention on the Law <strong>of</strong> Treaties, 2 nd edition, Mell<strong>and</strong> Schill Monographs inInternational Law (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984), p 138.96
- Page 2:
Oceans of Noise 2004A WDCS Science
- Page 8 and 9:
In the US, the deployment of Low Fr
- Page 10 and 11:
its propagation beyond those declar
- Page 12 and 13:
The best evidence for noise being f
- Page 14 and 15:
Box 1. Characteristics of sound / l
- Page 16 and 17:
Sound speed (c)The speed (c) of a w
- Page 18 and 19:
Box 2. The effects of temperature,
- Page 20 and 21:
2.1.2. Measuring sound intensityIde
- Page 22 and 23:
i.e. Equal pressure measurements di
- Page 24 and 25:
Spherical or Geometrical spreading
- Page 28 and 29:
5.0 145Tug pulling loaded barge 1.0
- Page 30 and 31:
The source used during 3-D surveys
- Page 32 and 33:
Machinery noisePropulsion machinery
- Page 34 and 35:
Man-made islands /caissonsFixed pla
- Page 36 and 37:
12 3245Drill bit6Figure 3.4. Sound
- Page 38 and 39:
Transientnoise sourcesAircraftHelic
- Page 40 and 41:
Results from the aerial surveys con
- Page 42 and 43:
haemorrhaging in the inner ears and
- Page 44 and 45:
However they also noted that whales
- Page 46 and 47: 4. The Use of Sound by CetaceansChr
- Page 48 and 49: seems logical, therefore, that if t
- Page 50 and 51: However, despite the reported low a
- Page 52 and 53: Kamminga and Wiersma 1981;Akamatsu
- Page 54 and 55: SongSocial callsShrieksSlaps0.03-80
- Page 56 and 57: anthropogenic factors that make the
- Page 58 and 59: 5.3 Longer-term impactsNoise is cle
- Page 60 and 61: 5.4 Indirect impactsThe above impac
- Page 62 and 63: decompression sickness (DCS) as see
- Page 64 and 65: 6. Examples of regional and nationa
- Page 66 and 67: 6.3 ASCOBANS and ACCOBAMSTwo region
- Page 68 and 69: implications and the discussion sho
- Page 70 and 71: 7.1. Consideration of Voluntary vs.
- Page 72 and 73: acoustic measurements have been mad
- Page 74 and 75: 7.6. Methods of protectionComplianc
- Page 76 and 77: 7.6.1 Monitoring7.6.1.1 Visual, aco
- Page 78 and 79: Delory et al. (2002) use Ambient No
- Page 80 and 81: 8. ReferencesAburto, A., Rountry, D
- Page 82 and 83: Caldwell, M.C., Caldwell, D.K., and
- Page 84 and 85: Engas, A., Lokkeborg, S., Ona, E. a
- Page 86 and 87: IWC 2002b. Report of the Scientific
- Page 88 and 89: McCauley, R.D. 1994. Seismic Survey
- Page 90 and 91: Potter, J. and Delory, E. 2001. Noi
- Page 92 and 93: Smolker, R.A., Mann, J. and Smuts,
- Page 94 and 95: Watkins, W.A. 1981b. The activities
- Page 98 and 99: an important factor. 13 The judgeme
- Page 100 and 101: in the preparatory work of the LOSC
- Page 102 and 103: practice by the UNEP Governing Coun
- Page 104 and 105: protection and preservation of the
- Page 106 and 107: than international rules, standards
- Page 108 and 109: Four of the twelve regional seas tr
- Page 110 and 111: seismic operations in the Protocol
- Page 112 and 113: ConclusionAt the global level, only
- Page 114 and 115: Art 209 LOSC focuses on both standa
- Page 116 and 117: No State Party may impose condition
- Page 118 and 119: coastal States”. This formulation
- Page 120 and 121: If the IMO makes this determination
- Page 122 and 123: estrictions to vessels operating in
- Page 124 and 125: In the EEZ, in comparison to the te
- Page 126 and 127: Appendix A - Some international ins
- Page 128 and 129: Convention for the Protection of th
- Page 130 and 131: Available at:http://www.unep.ch/sea
- Page 132 and 133: BucharestConventionArticle XIPollut
- Page 134 and 135: environment1. The Contracting Parti
- Page 136 and 137: - that under Article III.8.c) of AC
- Page 138 and 139: e) no sudden or repeated change in
- Page 140 and 141: Ref: Nowacek et al. 2001.Location:
- Page 142 and 143: Location: Arctic• Vocal behaviour
- Page 144 and 145: • Vaquita surfacing duration and
- Page 146 and 147:
• 6% of small delphinids (n=264;
- Page 148 and 149:
Species type: Boto, Inia geoffrensi
- Page 150 and 151:
• Humpback whales appeared tolera
- Page 152 and 153:
• Behaviour interpreted as aggres
- Page 154 and 155:
• There was no evidence of minke
- Page 156 and 157:
• Northern right whales may be ap
- Page 158 and 159:
• Migrating gray whales disturbed
- Page 160 and 161:
to Ensenada De La Paz, Mexico. Aqua
- Page 162 and 163:
distribution of humpback whales, Me
- Page 164 and 165:
Richardson, C.R. Greene, C.I. Malme
- Page 166 and 167:
Zhou, K., Pilleri, G. and Li, Y. 19
- Page 168 and 169:
6. surveys for Cuvier’s beaked wh