Watkins, W.A. 1981b. The activities <strong>and</strong> underwater sounds <strong>of</strong> fin whales. Scientific Reports <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Whale</strong>s ResearchInstitute 33: 83-117.Watkins, W.A. <strong>and</strong> Schevill, W.E. 1972. Sound source location by arrival-times on a non-rigid three-dimensionalhydrophone array. Deep Sea Research 19: 691-706.Watkins, W.A., Moore, K.E. <strong>and</strong> Tyack, P. 1985. Sperm whales acoustic behaviour in the Southeast Caribbean.Cetology 49: 1-15.Watkins, W.A., Tyack, P., Moore, K.E. <strong>and</strong> Bird, J.E. 1987. The 20 Hz signals <strong>of</strong> finback whales, Balaenopteraphysalus. Journal <strong>of</strong> the Acoustical <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> America 82: 1901-1912.Weiss, R. 2001. <strong>Whale</strong>s’ deaths linked to Navy’s sonar tests. Washington Post December 31: A8.Welch, B.L. <strong>and</strong> Welch, A.S. 1970. Physiological effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>noise</strong>. Plenum Press, New York.Weilgart, L. 1997. Marmam. Correspondence 1/8/97.Wenz, G. M. (1962).Acoustic ambient <strong>noise</strong> in the ocean: Spectra <strong>and</strong> sources. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34(12): 1936 –1956.Whitehead, H. <strong>and</strong> Weilgart, L. 200. Science <strong>and</strong> the manegement <strong>of</strong> underwater <strong>noise</strong>: information gaps <strong>and</strong> polluterpower. Abstract presented at the Animal Bioacoustics session <strong>of</strong> the 142 nd meeting <strong>of</strong> the JASA.Whitehead, H. <strong>and</strong> Weilgart, L. 1995. Marine mammal science, the U.S. Navy <strong>and</strong> academic freedom. Mar. MammalSci. 11:260-263.Wiggins, S. M., Oleson, E. M. <strong>and</strong> Hildebr<strong>and</strong>, J. A. 2001. Blue whale call intensity varies with ambient <strong>noise</strong> level. J.Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol.110, No.5, Pt.2. p. 2771.Williams, R. Trites, A. W. <strong>and</strong> Bain, D. E.. 2002. Behavioural responses <strong>of</strong> killer whales to whale watching boats:opportunistic observations <strong>and</strong> experimental approaches. J. Zool. Soc. 256, 255-270.Williams, R.M., A.W. Trites, <strong>and</strong> D.E. Bain. 1998. Interactions between boats <strong>and</strong> killer whales (Orcinus orca) inJohnstone Strait, BC, Canada. p. 149 in Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the World Marine Mammal Science Conference, January 1998,Monaco.Winkler, T. 1999. <strong>Dolphin</strong>s ‘put at risk’ by navy exercises. The Scotsman, 5 July.Winn, H.E. <strong>and</strong> Perkins, P.J. 1976. Distribution <strong>and</strong> sounds <strong>of</strong> the minke whale, with a review <strong>of</strong> mysticete sounds.Cetology 19: 1-12.Winn, H.E., Perkins, P.J. <strong>and</strong> Winn, L. 1970. Sounds <strong>and</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> the northern bottle-nosed whale. In Proceedings<strong>of</strong> the 7 th Annual Conference on Biological Sonar <strong>and</strong> Diving Mammals, pp. 53-59. Stanford Research Institute, MenloPark, California.Wursig <strong>and</strong> Evans, 1998. Cetaceans <strong>and</strong> Humans: Influences <strong>of</strong> <strong>noise</strong>. ? pages 216-232.Würsig, B. <strong>and</strong> Clark, C. 1993. Behavior. In The Bowhead <strong>Whale</strong> (ed. J. Burns, J. Montague <strong>and</strong> C. Cowles), pp. 157-200. <strong>Society</strong> for Marine Mammalogy, Special Publication No. 2. Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.Würsig, B., Dorsey, E.M., Richardson, W.J., Clark, C.W. <strong>and</strong> Payne, R. 1985. Normal behavior <strong>of</strong> bowheads. InBehavior, disturbance responses <strong>and</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> bowhead whales, Balaena mysticetus, in the eastern Beaufort Sea,1980-84 (ed. W.J. Richardson), pp. 33-143. OCS Study MMS 85-0034. LGL Ecological Research Associates Inc.,Bryan, Texas. 306pp.Yablokov, A.V., Bel’kovich, V.M. <strong>and</strong> Borisov, V.I. 1974. <strong>Whale</strong>s <strong>and</strong> <strong>Dolphin</strong>s: Part II. JPRS Translation 62150-2.286pp.Young, N.M. 1989. Dive <strong>and</strong> ventilation patterns correlated to behaviour <strong>of</strong> fin whales, Balaenoptera physalus, in CapeCod <strong>and</strong> Massachusetts bays. In Abstracts <strong>of</strong> the 8 th Biennial Conference on the Biology <strong>of</strong> Marine Mammals,93
December 1989, Pacific Grove, California. p. 74. <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> Marine Mammalogy, Pacific Grove, California. 81pp.(Abstract).Zagaeski, M. 1987. Some observations on the prey stunning hypothesis. Marine Mammal Science 3: 275-279.Zahavi, A. 1987. The theory <strong>of</strong> sexual selection <strong>and</strong> some <strong>of</strong> its implications. In International Symposium <strong>of</strong> BiologicalEvolution (ed. V.P. Delfino), pp. 305-327. Adriatica Editrice, Bari, Italy.Underwater acoustics – Navy Ships.Http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/acoustics.htmChapter 8 - Principles <strong>of</strong> underwater sound.http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/navy/docs/fun/part08.htmAn introduction to underwater acoustics.http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/vents/acoustics/tutorial/tutorial.html94
- Page 2:
Oceans of Noise 2004A WDCS Science
- Page 8 and 9:
In the US, the deployment of Low Fr
- Page 10 and 11:
its propagation beyond those declar
- Page 12 and 13:
The best evidence for noise being f
- Page 14 and 15:
Box 1. Characteristics of sound / l
- Page 16 and 17:
Sound speed (c)The speed (c) of a w
- Page 18 and 19:
Box 2. The effects of temperature,
- Page 20 and 21:
2.1.2. Measuring sound intensityIde
- Page 22 and 23:
i.e. Equal pressure measurements di
- Page 24 and 25:
Spherical or Geometrical spreading
- Page 28 and 29:
5.0 145Tug pulling loaded barge 1.0
- Page 30 and 31:
The source used during 3-D surveys
- Page 32 and 33:
Machinery noisePropulsion machinery
- Page 34 and 35:
Man-made islands /caissonsFixed pla
- Page 36 and 37:
12 3245Drill bit6Figure 3.4. Sound
- Page 38 and 39:
Transientnoise sourcesAircraftHelic
- Page 40 and 41:
Results from the aerial surveys con
- Page 42 and 43:
haemorrhaging in the inner ears and
- Page 44 and 45: However they also noted that whales
- Page 46 and 47: 4. The Use of Sound by CetaceansChr
- Page 48 and 49: seems logical, therefore, that if t
- Page 50 and 51: However, despite the reported low a
- Page 52 and 53: Kamminga and Wiersma 1981;Akamatsu
- Page 54 and 55: SongSocial callsShrieksSlaps0.03-80
- Page 56 and 57: anthropogenic factors that make the
- Page 58 and 59: 5.3 Longer-term impactsNoise is cle
- Page 60 and 61: 5.4 Indirect impactsThe above impac
- Page 62 and 63: decompression sickness (DCS) as see
- Page 64 and 65: 6. Examples of regional and nationa
- Page 66 and 67: 6.3 ASCOBANS and ACCOBAMSTwo region
- Page 68 and 69: implications and the discussion sho
- Page 70 and 71: 7.1. Consideration of Voluntary vs.
- Page 72 and 73: acoustic measurements have been mad
- Page 74 and 75: 7.6. Methods of protectionComplianc
- Page 76 and 77: 7.6.1 Monitoring7.6.1.1 Visual, aco
- Page 78 and 79: Delory et al. (2002) use Ambient No
- Page 80 and 81: 8. ReferencesAburto, A., Rountry, D
- Page 82 and 83: Caldwell, M.C., Caldwell, D.K., and
- Page 84 and 85: Engas, A., Lokkeborg, S., Ona, E. a
- Page 86 and 87: IWC 2002b. Report of the Scientific
- Page 88 and 89: McCauley, R.D. 1994. Seismic Survey
- Page 90 and 91: Potter, J. and Delory, E. 2001. Noi
- Page 92 and 93: Smolker, R.A., Mann, J. and Smuts,
- Page 96 and 97: ANNEX 1The Application of Marine Po
- Page 98 and 99: an important factor. 13 The judgeme
- Page 100 and 101: in the preparatory work of the LOSC
- Page 102 and 103: practice by the UNEP Governing Coun
- Page 104 and 105: protection and preservation of the
- Page 106 and 107: than international rules, standards
- Page 108 and 109: Four of the twelve regional seas tr
- Page 110 and 111: seismic operations in the Protocol
- Page 112 and 113: ConclusionAt the global level, only
- Page 114 and 115: Art 209 LOSC focuses on both standa
- Page 116 and 117: No State Party may impose condition
- Page 118 and 119: coastal States”. This formulation
- Page 120 and 121: If the IMO makes this determination
- Page 122 and 123: estrictions to vessels operating in
- Page 124 and 125: In the EEZ, in comparison to the te
- Page 126 and 127: Appendix A - Some international ins
- Page 128 and 129: Convention for the Protection of th
- Page 130 and 131: Available at:http://www.unep.ch/sea
- Page 132 and 133: BucharestConventionArticle XIPollut
- Page 134 and 135: environment1. The Contracting Parti
- Page 136 and 137: - that under Article III.8.c) of AC
- Page 138 and 139: e) no sudden or repeated change in
- Page 140 and 141: Ref: Nowacek et al. 2001.Location:
- Page 142 and 143: Location: Arctic• Vocal behaviour
- Page 144 and 145:
• Vaquita surfacing duration and
- Page 146 and 147:
• 6% of small delphinids (n=264;
- Page 148 and 149:
Species type: Boto, Inia geoffrensi
- Page 150 and 151:
• Humpback whales appeared tolera
- Page 152 and 153:
• Behaviour interpreted as aggres
- Page 154 and 155:
• There was no evidence of minke
- Page 156 and 157:
• Northern right whales may be ap
- Page 158 and 159:
• Migrating gray whales disturbed
- Page 160 and 161:
to Ensenada De La Paz, Mexico. Aqua
- Page 162 and 163:
distribution of humpback whales, Me
- Page 164 and 165:
Richardson, C.R. Greene, C.I. Malme
- Page 166 and 167:
Zhou, K., Pilleri, G. and Li, Y. 19
- Page 168 and 169:
6. surveys for Cuvier’s beaked wh