12.07.2015 Views

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hansen: <strong>The</strong> Nature <strong>of</strong> World 107the figure <strong>of</strong> Siddhattha, and second, with the contest for power betweenthe two princes. Like a worldly king—but again to a hyperbolized extent—Mårå is himself a morally ambivalent figure who is at once powerful,potentially malevolent, duplicitous, and selfishly jealous. In Khmer vernacularusage, he is understood abstractly as an “obstacle to progress ormovement” or as death itself; he is also referred to as “the enemy <strong>of</strong> theLord Buddha” and one who actively prevents others from “allowing meritand benefit to arise.” 98 Yet he is also clear-sighted enough to be able torecognize the superior merit <strong>of</strong> the Bodhisatta and he is sufficiently intelligentand merit-filled to concede defeat and take refuge in the spiritualpower <strong>of</strong> the Buddha.<strong>The</strong> Bodhisatta rejects Mårå’s <strong>of</strong>fer to become a căkravartin because “itis impure, like urine and saliva.” A Buddha’s power, derived entirely frommerit and purification, is far more potent than a king’s power, overwhelmingthe kind <strong>of</strong> violent force (even in its hyperbolized form) that kings areable to generate. But in spite <strong>of</strong> the clear hierarchy in this two-tieredconception <strong>of</strong> power, the inter-linking also ends up affirming the meritoriousidentity <strong>of</strong> kings, as scholars <strong>of</strong> the <strong>The</strong>ravåda have long noted. Kingsmay have to undertake some nasty actions in order to fulfill their duties askings, but they are still regarded as meritorious beings in order to havetaken rebirth as kings.<strong>The</strong> poem’s depiction <strong>of</strong> the comparative rankings <strong>of</strong> worldly andspiritual power asserts the “traditional” mores <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong>ravådin ideas concerningkingship, authority, and merit. Worldly power was supposed to beexercised, albeit reluctantly, by a virtuous prince who ruled according toDhammic principles. His rule was just and created harmony and prosperityfor his kingdom’s inhabitants. Dhammic power, greater than any form<strong>of</strong> worldly power, was the ultimate authority, giving order and meaningto existence. <strong>The</strong> harmony and prosperity <strong>of</strong> individuals in theworld thus depended on the Dhammic linking <strong>of</strong> merit and power tocreate justice.Nineteenth-century Khmer representations <strong>of</strong> the world privileged adepiction <strong>of</strong> the individual, world, and time itself as interconnected,morally charged, and created by moral action. Embedded in a social andpolitical context in which the map <strong>of</strong> a world containing the invertedMount Meru was being contested by the introduction <strong>of</strong> new colonialgeographies <strong>of</strong> identity, 99 works like the vernacular poem Ry ° açPa†hamasambodhi and the Jåtaka surveyed in this essay served as literarysites in which Khmer intellectuals and scribes could articulate a vision <strong>of</strong>modern identity inscribed in <strong>Buddhist</strong> terms. <strong>The</strong> poem Pa†hamasambodhiaffirms the image <strong>of</strong> a world that makes sense according to <strong>Buddhist</strong>theories <strong>of</strong> how reality functions, with the present, past, and future determinedby moral actions that predictably but unexpectedly ripen and bearfruit, much like the spontaneous generation <strong>of</strong> the jeweled throne formed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!