12.07.2015 Views

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

338Pacific WorldIn advanced tantric practices, one visualizes oneself as already being atantric deity, fully enlightened with all attendant buddha-qualities. InDzogchen, inherent perfection or buddhahood is considered one’s primordialcondition from the very beginning. Again, this common theme takeseither a symbolic or non-symbolic form depending on the path: in tantrathe identification is accomplished through symbolic visualization whileDzogchen bypasses symbols altogether (one’s current predicament is thema√∂ala). Put another way, both tantra and Dzogchen are means <strong>of</strong>“tuning in” to the here and now, one through symbols and one nonsymbolicallythrough the experience <strong>of</strong> immediate presence. This nonsymbolicapproach is directly correlated by Nyingmapas with Dzogchen’sultimate superiority as a path, since from the Nyingma perspective anytype <strong>of</strong> condition imposed on experience is necessarily an obscuration <strong>of</strong>one’s true, primordial nature. 75Dzogchen View: Ultimate and Conventional RealityReality, according to the Indo-Tibetan Mahåyåna <strong>Buddhist</strong> tradition,may be understood from two different perspectives: “ultimate”(paramårthasatya) or “conventional” (saµv®tisatya). Conventional realityis usually identified with the ordinary cognition <strong>of</strong> things as “inherentlyexisting.” Ultimate Reality, on the other hand, refers to emptiness (Ω¥nyatå):the absence <strong>of</strong> inherent existence in any “thing” and therefore the ultimateillusoriness <strong>of</strong> “reality” at the conventional level. 76 In the Tibetan context,however, the meaning <strong>of</strong> ultimate Reality is more complex. Tibetan Buddhismis essentially tantric. And though an apophatic understanding <strong>of</strong>emptiness (associated with Pråsaçgika Mådhyamaka) represents the <strong>of</strong>ficialposition on ultimate Reality held by many Tibetan <strong>Buddhist</strong>s (especiallyGelugpas), the pervasively tantric character <strong>of</strong> Tibetan <strong>Buddhist</strong>practice lends itself to a more cataphatic approach. From the tantricperspective, emptiness is “a radiant presence full <strong>of</strong> vivid imagery” thatconstitutes “the source <strong>of</strong> [the] … primordial energy that brings all possibleforms, even the universe itself, into manifestation.” 77Tibetan Buddhism is also influenced by other, more cataphatic forms<strong>of</strong> Indian Mahåyåna Buddhism, such as Yogåcåra and the concept <strong>of</strong>tathågatagarbha—the innately pure and luminous Buddha-nature residingwithin all sentient beings. Yogåcåra has been particularly important forthe Nyingma school. According to Samuel, Nyingmapas have historicallytended to emphasize “Yogåcåra [i.e., positive] conceptualizations <strong>of</strong> thepath” rather than the Pråsaçgika Madhyamaka approach <strong>of</strong> strict negation.78 <strong>The</strong> result is that Tibetan, and particularly Nyingma, presentations<strong>of</strong> ultimate Reality <strong>of</strong>ten sound much more positive than the term “emptiness”suggests.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!