12.07.2015 Views

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

330Pacific Worldself (as ego) will never be “perfect” (and even if they are, they are bound tochange). Psychological health (as ordinarily understood) is more accuratelya balance <strong>of</strong> both, with the first predominating. More commonly,however, the second predominates, since direct manipulation <strong>of</strong> experience(through fantasy, addiction, etc.) is an easier and safer way tocope with dissonance and pain than acting to change one’s self andenvironment.“Regulating the experiential stream” itself includes a whole range <strong>of</strong>processes which together function to manipulate the “stream <strong>of</strong> experienceto stabilize itself in the steady state <strong>of</strong> its actual cognitive organization.” 33This experiential regulation takes two basic forms: (1) the active shaping <strong>of</strong>internal experience to confirm concepts, and (2) the inhibition <strong>of</strong> inputs thatcontradict concepts. In the first case, “self-stabilization… involves the use<strong>of</strong> conations to structure the stream <strong>of</strong> percepts to progressive correspondencewith the set <strong>of</strong> constructs already evolved in the system.” 34 Forexample, the internal narrative functions as a reinforcing mechanism, bycontinuously “telling the story” <strong>of</strong> self and world as defined by ourconceptual constructs. This involvement in the internal narrative simultaneouslyaccomplishes the second function, reducing dissonance by inhibitingawareness <strong>of</strong> contradictory or threatening inputs (from either internalor external sources). For example, mental reiteration <strong>of</strong> the self-image maybe used to suppress input contradicting that self-image. Kicking one’s dogin a fit <strong>of</strong> anger might be followed by a flash <strong>of</strong> discomfort at beingconfronted with information that conflicts with one’s self-image (i.e., “I amnice” or “I am an animal lover”). This discomfort may in turn be followedby a variety <strong>of</strong> responses functioning in some way to suppress the threateninginput. For example, attention may be diverted to some other activity(distraction) or substances may be ingested to numb or distract awareness.Conflicting input may also be rationalized away (the dog was bad andtherefore deserved to be kicked) or suppressed through attempts to reinstatethe self-image by obsessively replaying the event over and over inone’s mind as it “should have happened.”<strong>The</strong> unspoken rules <strong>of</strong> appropriate social behavior may also functionas a mechanism <strong>of</strong> denial maintenance—in this case, a preventative measureto minimize image-threatening inputs before they occur. A covertagreement <strong>of</strong> polite, adult interaction is to avoid making excessive demandson others. One possible reason for this is an unconscious understandingthat asking too much <strong>of</strong> another forces her to experience thedissonance between her naturally selfish impulses (“I don’t want to do it”)and her self-image <strong>of</strong> being good or nice. Asking too much threatens theother’s denial. For the person experiencing the discomfort <strong>of</strong> such dissonance,the source <strong>of</strong> the request is experienced as the cause <strong>of</strong> this discomfort,and therefore becomes a threat who must be attacked (subtly throughjudgment, or not so subtly through more overt forms <strong>of</strong> aggression). Not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!