12.07.2015 Views

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

PACIFIC WORLD - The Institute of Buddhist Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Studstill: Cybernetic Approach to Dzogchen 351details.” 184 Tantric practices in particular are simplified, with focus beingon “the generation <strong>of</strong> concentration rather than any quality <strong>of</strong> the techniquein and <strong>of</strong> itself.” 185Dzogchen Practice Proper<strong>The</strong> various preliminary techniques <strong>of</strong> Dzogchen are generally consideredessential means <strong>of</strong> turning the mind from its habitual egocentrictendencies, and as Dzogchen evolved historically (especially from theeleventh century onwards) they became increasingly important based onthe recognition that holding to simple awareness requires prior practice instabilizing the mind. 186 From the perspective <strong>of</strong> Dzogchen, however, atsome point in one’s spiritual maturation such practices stop being an aid toawakening and instead become an obstacle. Reality (the Ground) is unconditioned,while these practices are themselves conditions that by definitionmust conceal the Ground, through both the structures <strong>of</strong> the practicesthemselves and the dualistic presupposition <strong>of</strong> path and goal. From aDzogchen perspective, an additional “practice” is necessary: “a techniquefree immersion in the bare immediacy <strong>of</strong> one’s own deepest levels <strong>of</strong>awareness,” 187 transcending the dualistic conditions <strong>of</strong> “path and goal,”“meditation and non-meditation,” and “quiescence and activity.” 188 In asense, the “method” becomes liberation itself, since the only way to realizea non-dual state is through non-duality itself. 189 At this level, practicebecomes non-practice. As Dilgo Khentse states, “One must realize that tomeditate is to pass beyond effort, beyond practice, beyond aims andgoals and beyond the dualism <strong>of</strong> bondage and liberation.” 190 Paradoxically,this non-dual, non-practice constitutes the complete severing <strong>of</strong>one’s ties to the mundane through the radically non-ordinary state <strong>of</strong>uncontrived presence.Dzogchen rhetoric notwithstanding, its rejection <strong>of</strong> practice (at least asan ultimate ideal), valorization <strong>of</strong> goalessness, and entire cosmology turnout to function as practice. <strong>The</strong> Dzogchen view constitutes an orientingframe <strong>of</strong> reference that actively shapes contemplative (and non-contemplative)experience and uproots the more subtle levels <strong>of</strong> conceptualduality (the persistent sense that one is a “practitioner” going somewhere)that are still active as one approaches the threshold <strong>of</strong> enlightenment: thepoint where practice leaves <strong>of</strong>f and pure awareness is realized. As notedabove, to existentially embrace the idea that everything, including ourselves,represents the presencing <strong>of</strong> Being and is therefore primordiallyperfect and already enlightened has direct implications on one’s relationshipto life and one’s own experience. First, it encourages a non-discriminatingattitude toward the world <strong>of</strong> phenomenal appearances. Since “whateverarises has arisen as the play (Rol-Ba) <strong>of</strong> the ultimate nature,” one

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!