01.12.2012 Views

7 Components: the Function Pages - Developers

7 Components: the Function Pages - Developers

7 Components: the Function Pages - Developers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The “key legal political invention” (Rilling) of <strong>the</strong> free software culture<br />

is <strong>the</strong> GPL license. It serves as <strong>the</strong> basis of fur<strong>the</strong>r free content<br />

licenses, such as FDL or Creative Commons. Using such licenses,<br />

and based on <strong>the</strong> respective national legal systems, an attempt is being<br />

made to utilize <strong>the</strong> legal framework to secure open goods and<br />

commons. In this regard, however, <strong>the</strong> discussion cannot stop at <strong>the</strong><br />

topic of digital and intellectual property. The question will be posed<br />

with regard to <strong>the</strong> overall concept of civil ownership. When attempting<br />

to answer <strong>the</strong> question, it could help to remember that <strong>the</strong> issue<br />

of ownership does not focus on <strong>the</strong> relationship between a person<br />

and a thing, but ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> relationship between people with reference<br />

to a thing.<br />

22.2.3<br />

Forms of Work<br />

It has been hinted at various occasions that <strong>the</strong> wiki philosophy inspires<br />

one to rethink <strong>the</strong> future organization of work. Centrally<br />

planned, controlled and regulated organizational models are countered<br />

with those that are decentralized and self-organized. One motive<br />

for this is that <strong>the</strong> tendency to subject work processes to bureaucratic<br />

controls (for instance in <strong>the</strong> course of quality or issue management)<br />

limits room for design and suffocates any intrinsic motivation.<br />

As early as <strong>the</strong> introduction of Linux, <strong>the</strong> free software movement<br />

not only confronted Windows with a new operating system,<br />

but also with a decentralized and democratic organizational philosophy.<br />

Alternatives are being sought to heteronymous and estranged<br />

work relationships, which ultimately also affect one's entire lifestyle,<br />

private life and <strong>the</strong> organization of one's free time. Some of <strong>the</strong> defenders<br />

of free software see here <strong>the</strong> budding of a new, noncapitalistic<br />

social order and hope that <strong>the</strong> production methods of<br />

programmers can be carried over to o<strong>the</strong>r social realms.<br />

In this regard, wikis are one in a series of free software success stories.<br />

It is being proven that, as in <strong>the</strong> case of o<strong>the</strong>r software projects,<br />

free work forms can be employed to surmount even complex problems.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> long run, <strong>the</strong>ir products and services will even demonstrate<br />

a high degree of permanence, because more people are involved<br />

in <strong>the</strong> development process right from <strong>the</strong> start.<br />

The extent to which Linux and <strong>the</strong> wiki philosophy are already<br />

examples of true counter-concepts thus remains to be seen. The Net<br />

world is currently an anarchistic one, yet it also reproduces existing<br />

control models. During <strong>the</strong> Linux debate, Nuss already argued that<br />

Legal political<br />

initiatives<br />

Alternative<br />

organisation<br />

models<br />

Counterconcepts?<br />

22.2 Wikis as an Engine for Social Change? �<br />

�<br />

�<br />

355

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!