12.07.2015 Views

Transcript of Hearing 12/12/97 - TWA Flight 800 Investigation

Transcript of Hearing 12/12/97 - TWA Flight 800 Investigation

Transcript of Hearing 12/12/97 - TWA Flight 800 Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11<strong>97</strong><strong>12</strong>3decision, and the decision was made in the 70’s. Whatis true is that we haven’t studied it since, until thisaccident.4But,I don’t want to leave the impression56that the FAA has been studying something for the lasttwenty-five years.7QWhat is your opinion <strong>of</strong> the -- we have been89discussing the foam technique for inerting orpreventing catastrophic explosion in fuel tanks.What10is your opinion <strong>of</strong> that technology at this point, sir?11DR. LOEB:Before you answer that, let -- I<strong>12</strong>would just like to ask a question, Mr. McSweeney.Why13141516is it that given that the fuel approach that you tookfailed, why is it that you did not go back and take alook at other options after the success <strong>of</strong> the early1<strong>97</strong>0 foam work?17WITNESS McSWEENEY:The tests that I think1819you are referring to is anti-misting kerosene, and thatwas ––20DR. LOEB:That is correct.21WITNESS McSWEENEY:That was the test in the22desert.That test showed that the benefits that people232425expected to have gotten from anti–misting kerosene andthe benefits before that time were seen in thelaboratory just did not present themselves in fullCAPITAL HILL REPORTING, INC.(202) 466-9500

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!