SEEU Review vol. 6 Nr. 2 (pdf) - South East European University

Teuta Iljazi, Ma.; Sadri Alija, MSc.Table 3: Students’ evaluation dataHomework(10)Quizzes(10)Attendance(10)First periodic Second periodic Totalexam (30) exam (40) (100)Not completed %Average ResultNot completed %Average ResultNo Records %Average ResultNot completed %Average ResultNot completed %Average ResultSmallgroupsTraditionalform15.38 7.32 6.73 4.61 57.14 7.91 4.81 18.06 24.32 12.75 50.6534.38 6.58 15.63 3.26 42.86 6.89 10.94 11.85 29.58 7.97 36.55We can see from the chart that the students that were taught in smallgroups have an average of 50.65 points out of 100, whereas those that wereexposed to traditional teaching earned 36.55 points – the difference is 14.1points. They performed better in attendance, homework and assessment.The students’ success for this year is shown in Graph 3 below. After thefinal evaluation, we came to see that 48 or 26.37% of students did not takethe final exam, whereas 51.82% of those that took the final exam showedpositive results with pass grades 6 – 10. The data from last year (traditionalform of teaching) showed that the number of students that did not take thefinal exam was 30.27% and 37.36% of those that took the final exam weresuccessful. It can be clearly seen that the students’ success using smallgroups has improved by 14.46% this year.162