the cancer virus. . . . Nixon was trying to steal the show from[Teddy] Kennedy by coming up with a virus and vaccine againstcancer. They said, "Let's find a virus." So that's where the bigcancer virus hypothesis came from.Now when we got these six cell lines from the Russians. . . Reesestarted looking at them and discovered that they were all female;then he discovered that they were all black. And so hequestioned, 'How many black females are there in Moscow whohave cancer?' And, of course, what he discovered was that thesewere all Henrietta Lack cell contaminants that contained monkeyviruses. And so all that stuff the Russians sent us was in fact afraud. But. . . it was a very embarrassing thing because theythought they had got there first, and what we proved was thatthey were awful scientists.So then what Walter Nelson Reese did is that he started lookingat all the cell lines of the United States, and closely. And [thenhe] discovered that at the NIH, over a third of them were HELAcontaminated.What happened was that when they would open their tissueculture lids, they would aerosolize small particles into the air.They would float around and drop into another cell line, andHELA's so aggressive that it will literally take over. And so itjust takes one cell to drop into another cell line and it takes over,and it amalgamates, and those were called HELA contaminated.And so what the NIH did to him [Dr. Reese] was, of course, defundedhim and put him out of business. Because he proved theywere all a bunch of idiots.LEN: Oh - I see.ROBERT: So then the problem was you had a whole bunch ofHELA-contaminated cell lines floating around and being sent outas clean cell lines and they weren't; they were actually humancancer malignant cell lines, and some of them contained virusesthat were from other species.And so it represented a big problem. Plus, they were throwing infetal calf serum which was contaminated with these bovineviruses.So you had a mixture for a natural [disaster]. I mean, the thing is,like they said in the '72 conferences, it's a wonder that we don'thave worse disasters. You just wonder why we haven't beenannihilated by these idiots.If, for instance, you look at the tissue cell culture that was used todetermine x-ray tolerance of human tissue, it turns out it's aHELA-contaminated cell line. Which means the most radiationresistantcell line in the world is used as the standard to determinehow much radiation a human should be exposed to!LEN: Unreal.ROBERT: Well, that's all documented in 'Conspiracy of Cells' by
Michael Gold. . . . Walter Nelson Reese now runs an art gallery.They put him out of business. . . .The ʺPatient Zeroʺ TheoryLEN: All right, let's get back. . . to the situation with AIDS. Whatabout the "patient zero theory?"ROBERT: That's nonsense. First off, this guy lived in Canada andflew primarily in Canadian cities, yet you must propose that heonly had sex in American cities because the disease broke out inspecific American cities where he allegedly had sex.In addition, it doesn't make any sense if you look at the timeframe. AIDS broke out in '78 in Manhattan and then in '80 in SanFrancisco. It didn't break out in Montreal in '79, or in Toronto, inQuebec, or Ontario in '80, whatever. It broke out in select citiesin the United States in a select time frame which correspondsexactly to the hepatitis B study. [22]LEN: OK. Let's talk about that study for a minute. If you couldconceive of a way that vaccine could have been contaminated,how could it have happened?ROBERT: Two ways. One way accidentally and one wayintentionally.LEN: All right then, elaborate. . . .ROBERT: Well the vaccine was prepared from gays first off, andthen it had plasma expanders that came from cattle added to it.LEN: So the hepatitis B vaccine is produced through the bovineserum.ROBERT: Yes. . . . It had expanders put into it as a mechanismof production.LEN: Like serum?ROBERT: Yeah, serum. . . . Because they needed to expand thevolume.LEN: Now is the vaccine produced in cow carcases?ROBERT: No, it's made from humans.LEN: The hepatitis B vaccine [is made] from the gay men'sserum?ROBERT: And also from straight men's serum.
- Page 2 and 3:
EMERGING VIRUSES: AIDS &EBOLANature
- Page 4 and 5:
inherent in the production of live
- Page 6 and 7:
natural barrier and has been shown
- Page 8 and 9:
"DAVID was an alcoholic, an active
- Page 10 and 11:
mass of circumstantial and scientif
- Page 12 and 13:
investigators, for a grossly uninfo
- Page 14 and 15:
NIAID-National Institute for Allerg
- Page 16 and 17:
Part IIntroduction and Scientific B
- Page 18 and 19:
viruses in the cow carcasses used t
- Page 20 and 21:
depend to maintain our relative fre
- Page 22 and 23:
ʺThe WHO Does What?ʺ"The only thi
- Page 24 and 25:
the buildup of new susceptibles in
- Page 26 and 27:
In 1964, shortly after President Ke
- Page 28 and 29:
lymphotrophic (lymph-cell-targeting
- Page 30 and 31:
immunological and therapeutic proce
- Page 32 and 33:
substances used in the diagnosis of
- Page 34 and 35:
Chronicle 1969;23;3:112-117.[20] Si
- Page 36 and 37:
In February 1967, as international
- Page 38 and 39:
experiments conducted at Porton, En
- Page 40 and 41:
technique, weapon, tactic, or strat
- Page 42 and 43:
mankind in general, require that th
- Page 44 and 45:
experimental studies is to be comme
- Page 46 and 47:
the virus genome, the genetic makeu
- Page 48 and 49:
[17] Horowitz LG and Kehoe L. Fear
- Page 50 and 51:
Chapter 4The Road to Fort Detrick R
- Page 52 and 53:
information, I decided to call the
- Page 54 and 55:
contamination) to help with manufac
- Page 56 and 57: nation. There is but one logical co
- Page 58 and 59: each part in terms of objectives -
- Page 60 and 61: weapons, and all other methods of b
- Page 62 and 63: two checks totaling $33,655.68 to t
- Page 64 and 65: Not surprisingly then, among the pr
- Page 66 and 67: and biological warfare. Indianapoli
- Page 68 and 69: Chapter 5The Emperorʹs New Virus"Y
- Page 70 and 71: At that time, retroviruses were see
- Page 72 and 73: it up to here with this goddamn dis
- Page 74 and 75: Collusion at the TopJim Goedert was
- Page 76 and 77: HTLV-III publication in Francis's p
- Page 78 and 79: the footprints of a retrovirus allo
- Page 80 and 81: questions. Had Gallo been ashamed o
- Page 82 and 83: Chapter 6Galloʹs Research Antholog
- Page 84 and 85: - - - - -Fig 6.2 - A Model of the N
- Page 86 and 87: That same year, Gallo and his cowor
- Page 88 and 89: team discussed the synthesis of new
- Page 90 and 91: STRINGNER S. YANGROBERT C. TINGBion
- Page 92 and 93: and pellets seperated. The pellets
- Page 94 and 95: [5] Gallo RC and Breitman TR. The e
- Page 96 and 97: Chapter 7An Interview with Dr. Robe
- Page 98 and 99: human viruses, and that the genetic
- Page 100 and 101: LEN: Now, who was studying that?ROB
- Page 102 and 103: father's recommendation that I coul
- Page 104 and 105: LEN: OK. Explain this now. Why did
- Page 108 and 109: LEN: OK.ROBERT: And. . . that's the
- Page 110 and 111: ROBERT: If you look in the world, w
- Page 112 and 113: ROBERT: They're in the references [
- Page 114 and 115: started with BVV.ROBERT: Well, in t
- Page 116 and 117: LEN: OK. So what happens then?ROBER
- Page 118 and 119: apology Gorbachev offered Reagan ac
- Page 120 and 121: slowly, and not fast. And that they
- Page 122 and 123: immunodeficiency virus. Nature 1987
- Page 124 and 125: GalloRC. Aminoacyl Transfer RNA Pro
- Page 126 and 127: history, organization, and program