12.07.2015 Views

Emerging Viruses-Aids & Ebola - By Leanard ... - preterhuman.net

Emerging Viruses-Aids & Ebola - By Leanard ... - preterhuman.net

Emerging Viruses-Aids & Ebola - By Leanard ... - preterhuman.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

unintentional infection?ROBERT: Well, the fact is that the vaccine could have beenprepared in a way that unintentionally infected them. Yes. [But]it might have been intentionally contaminated by somebody[also]. . . . They may have been testing gays trying to develop animmunity against something they knew was already rippingthrough Africa. . . . It could be that they were testing it just to testit, or it could be that somebody intentionally was trying toextenninate gays, or in our opinion, it could be that their actualgoal was to exterminate the United States.Strecker's latter remark took me by surprise. It was the first thinghe said which to me made no sense.LEN: The actual goal was to try to exterminate the United States?And that's one of your most plausible explanations?ROBERT: Yes.LEN: And who would have been behind that?ROBERT: Some foreign party. The Russians or someone whodidn't like us. Because the Russians have talked about that forfifty years. There have been KGB biological warfare experts thathave been trying to do that to us for fifty years.[I felt intuitively uncomfortable with Strecker's explanation. Irecalled his comments about Walter Nelson Reese which provedthe Soviets knew far less about viral biotechnology thanAmerican researchers. Moreover, it seemed farfetched to believethe Russians had somehow managed to infiltrate the New YorkCity Blood Center which appeared to be the starting point for theAIDS epidemic in America. This part of Strecker's theory wouldhave required Szmuness, or one of his associates, to have been asecret agent working for Russia.]LEN: OK, but why would they have started with gays?ROBERT: For a very obvious reason. And that is because nothingwould be done. Just think about this. Suppose you put this virusin the heterosexuals or kids. What kind of response would haveoccurred compared to the response that did occur?LEN: Right. That's for sure. Quite different. I appreciate that, butstill, even to this day, the heterosexual spread is limitedcompared to the spread in the gay population.ROBERT: Only in this country.LEN: Right.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!