Emerging Viruses-Aids & Ebola - By Leanard ... - preterhuman.net

they were trying to get the virus/cancer hypothesis proved; theywanted to develop a vaccine, and they wanted to find out whichof those [viruses] were actually causing cancer because theyweren't sure. [24]So how do you prove it. How do you prove Koch's postuiates[25] in the case of virus and cancer?LEN: Difficult.ROBERT: Yeah. You've got to test them.LEN: Right.ROBERT: It's like saying because you have lung cancer inwomen; it's because they wear hose. That doesn't prove anything.You've got to have causation. So they were stuck.Now that's what was said in our references. They said, "let's testit; let's test it in humans with the same degree of sophisticatedexperiments that we use in animals." What does that mean?And then they published their test sites. And the test sites areexactly where AIDS is. We had these huge laboratories overthere. [24]LEN: And what year was that?ROBERT: 1972, I think. . . . It says that epidemiological studiesare of no use per se. So what do you conclude?LEN: That they're going to have to test it in a population.ROBERT: Exactly. And then it says we're going to test thesethings in sibships - brothers and sisters from the same family.And they were going to study the time course of the infection.And then we said, well, what do you mean by that? And theysaid, well, we're gonna study the antibody response. And I said,well you already knew the antibody response. How could therebe any time course to that. The only thing that a time coursecould refer to is an infection. Which means you had to haveactive particles. That's all in the references, [26] Anyway in 1972they said, let's make a T-cell destroyer. That's out of the bulletinof the WHO.LEN: That I know.ROBERT: The same year, they said let's test it, and then let'sinject it. And then they published their test sites which is a mapof Africa where they have all their test sites, and that correspondsexactly to the outbreak of AIDS.LEN: Do you have those maps anywhere?