EMERGING VIRUSES: AIDS &EBOLANature, Accident or Intentional?Tetrahedron, Inc. 1996.Leonard G. Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H.Foreward by W. John Martin, M.D., Ph.D."To do evil a human being must first of all believe that what he'sdoing is good . . .Ideology - that is what gives devildoing its long-soughtjustification and gives the evildoer the necessary steatfastnessand determination. That is the social theory Which helps to makehis acts seem good instead of bad in his own and others' eyes, sothat he won't hear reproaches and curses but will receive praiseand honors."-Russian dissident Alexander SolzhenitsynDEDICATED TO THE SEEKERS OF TRUTHand to those who, regardless of risk, labor tirelessly to tell it.To the ReaderTHIS BOOK is painfully nonfiction - the story is true, thecharacters, scientific and political, are real. Secondary referenceshave been checked and authenticated.Since the importance of this information was clear, I labored towrite for both critical health scientists and intelligent lay readerswithout losing either. Technical words are explained in lay termsfor all to better understand.Though many people - black, white, gay, straight, Jew andgentile - may wish to deny the implications of this work, the truthis the truth. As British statesman Edmund Burke said in the wakeof the American revolution, "People never give up their libertiesbut under some delusion." Perhaps now, as AIDS consumes thelives, liberties, and pursuits of an estimated 30 million HIVpositivepeople worldwide, the time has come to vanquish ourdelusions about it and its origin.Despite its social and scientific importance, the origin of HIV hasbeen clouded in mystery. Based on the mass of circumstantialand scientific evidence presented herein, the theory that"emerging viruses" like HIV and <strong>Ebola</strong> spontaneously evolvedand naturally jumped species from monkey to man must beseriously questioned.
There is an old saying in medicine, that diagnosis is requiredbefore treatment. The facts presented here, easily verified, mayhelp diagnose the man-made origin of the world's most fearedand deadly viruses. It is hoped this work will, therefore, helpredirect AIDS science in search of a cure, free AIDS victimsfrom the guilt and stigma attached to the disease, as well asprevent such "emerging viruses" from reemerging.I offer this investigation into the orgin of AIDS and <strong>Ebola</strong> forcritical review in the hope that it may also contribute to greaterhonesty in science, to political, military, and intelligencecommunity reforms that are truly peace loving, and to self andsocial reflection as a preventative against inhumanity.-LEONARD G. HOROWITZForewordAll at once, it seems, new viruses and virus-related diseases havethreatened the health of humans and many animal species. Howdid this situation arise? Could it be that scientific studies and theemergence of new pathogens are not totally unrelated events? Inwriting this text, Dr. Horowitz has bravely questioned the extentto which scientific research and lax government oversight mayhave contributed to the present and coming plagues.Open debate on this issue has been soundly discouraged.Opponents to open dialogue on the apparent relationship betweenearly viral research and the latest germ discoveries argue thatlittle good, and considerable harm, would come from a fulldisclosure of the facts. Exposing the truth, many believed, wouldlikely: I) tarnish the reputations of certain scientists, 2) make itmore difficult to maintain science funding, 3) promoteantigovernment sentiment, and 4) likely leave many issuesunresolved. Others argued that it was simply too late to undo pastmistakes. The fact that a better understanding of the new viruses'origins could lead to new treatment approaches, and, moreimportantly, to ways of preventing future outbreaks, wasdisregarded.In considering the recent genesis of HIV and the <strong>Ebola</strong> viruses,Dr. Horowitz's book has explored three areas of great general andscientific interest: 1) the history of intensive research into theviral causes of cancer wherein readers can become familiar withthe many, now questionable, virus transmission experiments, 2)the CIA and Department of Defense efforts to develop anddefend against biological weapons of germ warfare. Here Dr.Horowitz should be especially congratulated for presenting wellresearchedlittle known facts that, though highly disturbing, arean important piece of history that may also bear heavily on theemergence of new viruses, and 3) vaccine production. Clearly, asanyone who reads this book will conclude, there is a great needfor more open dialogue concerning the past and present risks
- Page 4 and 5: inherent in the production of live
- Page 6 and 7: natural barrier and has been shown
- Page 8 and 9: "DAVID was an alcoholic, an active
- Page 10 and 11: mass of circumstantial and scientif
- Page 12 and 13: investigators, for a grossly uninfo
- Page 14 and 15: NIAID-National Institute for Allerg
- Page 16 and 17: Part IIntroduction and Scientific B
- Page 18 and 19: viruses in the cow carcasses used t
- Page 20 and 21: depend to maintain our relative fre
- Page 22 and 23: ʺThe WHO Does What?ʺ"The only thi
- Page 24 and 25: the buildup of new susceptibles in
- Page 26 and 27: In 1964, shortly after President Ke
- Page 28 and 29: lymphotrophic (lymph-cell-targeting
- Page 30 and 31: immunological and therapeutic proce
- Page 32 and 33: substances used in the diagnosis of
- Page 34 and 35: Chronicle 1969;23;3:112-117.[20] Si
- Page 36 and 37: In February 1967, as international
- Page 38 and 39: experiments conducted at Porton, En
- Page 40 and 41: technique, weapon, tactic, or strat
- Page 42 and 43: mankind in general, require that th
- Page 44 and 45: experimental studies is to be comme
- Page 46 and 47: the virus genome, the genetic makeu
- Page 48 and 49: [17] Horowitz LG and Kehoe L. Fear
- Page 50 and 51: Chapter 4The Road to Fort Detrick R
- Page 52 and 53:
information, I decided to call the
- Page 54 and 55:
contamination) to help with manufac
- Page 56 and 57:
nation. There is but one logical co
- Page 58 and 59:
each part in terms of objectives -
- Page 60 and 61:
weapons, and all other methods of b
- Page 62 and 63:
two checks totaling $33,655.68 to t
- Page 64 and 65:
Not surprisingly then, among the pr
- Page 66 and 67:
and biological warfare. Indianapoli
- Page 68 and 69:
Chapter 5The Emperorʹs New Virus"Y
- Page 70 and 71:
At that time, retroviruses were see
- Page 72 and 73:
it up to here with this goddamn dis
- Page 74 and 75:
Collusion at the TopJim Goedert was
- Page 76 and 77:
HTLV-III publication in Francis's p
- Page 78 and 79:
the footprints of a retrovirus allo
- Page 80 and 81:
questions. Had Gallo been ashamed o
- Page 82 and 83:
Chapter 6Galloʹs Research Antholog
- Page 84 and 85:
- - - - -Fig 6.2 - A Model of the N
- Page 86 and 87:
That same year, Gallo and his cowor
- Page 88 and 89:
team discussed the synthesis of new
- Page 90 and 91:
STRINGNER S. YANGROBERT C. TINGBion
- Page 92 and 93:
and pellets seperated. The pellets
- Page 94 and 95:
[5] Gallo RC and Breitman TR. The e
- Page 96 and 97:
Chapter 7An Interview with Dr. Robe
- Page 98 and 99:
human viruses, and that the genetic
- Page 100 and 101:
LEN: Now, who was studying that?ROB
- Page 102 and 103:
father's recommendation that I coul
- Page 104 and 105:
LEN: OK. Explain this now. Why did
- Page 106 and 107:
the cancer virus. . . . Nixon was t
- Page 108 and 109:
LEN: OK.ROBERT: And. . . that's the
- Page 110 and 111:
ROBERT: If you look in the world, w
- Page 112 and 113:
ROBERT: They're in the references [
- Page 114 and 115:
started with BVV.ROBERT: Well, in t
- Page 116 and 117:
LEN: OK. So what happens then?ROBER
- Page 118 and 119:
apology Gorbachev offered Reagan ac
- Page 120 and 121:
slowly, and not fast. And that they
- Page 122 and 123:
immunodeficiency virus. Nature 1987
- Page 124 and 125:
GalloRC. Aminoacyl Transfer RNA Pro
- Page 126 and 127:
history, organization, and program