12.07.2015 Views

4(%3)3 - Ecole nationale supérieure de chimie de Montpellier

4(%3)3 - Ecole nationale supérieure de chimie de Montpellier

4(%3)3 - Ecole nationale supérieure de chimie de Montpellier

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure – 2.21: Evolution of healing rate with respect to perforation healing% at different pressures.Lastly, consi<strong>de</strong>ring the perforation to be a perfectly circular in nature and healing phenomenontaking place evenly from all direction, the healing rate of the membrane could also calculated fromresistance values (Figure – 2.21). The correlation between the healing rate and healing % reveals thatrate of healing <strong>de</strong>creases rapidly with the increase in pressure. At 20% healing, a maximum healing rateof 12 µm 2 .sec -1 was observed at 0.8 bar although it <strong>de</strong>creased rapidly to 2 µm 2 /sec once 70 % healingwas achieved.To complement the self-healing calculations based on flow resistance, Scanning ElectronMicroscopy (SEM) images were obtained for unhealed and healed membranes (Figure – 2.22a, b, c andd). Due to the piercing by the needle, the perforation is caused in such a manner that the brokenfragments are aligned in the downward direction (Figure – 2.22a). From images of partially healed andfully healed membranes at 0.07 and 0.8 bar respectively, it can be seen that the fragments coming backonto the perforation plane and joining together to close the perforation (Figure – 2.22b, c). No healingwas observed for pressures higher than 1.5 bar (Figure – 2.22d) which is in good agreement with waterflow resistance recovery measurements.67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!