Use good survey methods. The better the survey method, the more useful the results willbe. Consider whether there is a non-response bias. For example, if the survey yields lessthan a 55% return, it is possible that the results do no accurately represent the totalpopulation (Turco, 1993). A r<strong>and</strong>om sub-sample <strong>of</strong> non-respondents could be interviewedto determine whether findings can be generalized. Plan your information gathering to bestutilize the resources available. A local community college or university may be interested inhelping with surveys as a class project. See also “Sources <strong>of</strong> Information” in Expendituresby Residents, Section 3.3. The book titled “Mail <strong>and</strong> Internet Surveys: The Tailored DesignMethod” by Don A. Dillman (2 nd edition) is also a good reference.Be careful. Document your assumptions <strong>and</strong> calculations, <strong>and</strong> back them with sound logic.Peer review <strong>of</strong> your calculations is a must. If you have staff members with somebackground in economics or finance, their review <strong>and</strong> support would be especiallyimportant. The true economic impact attributable to a special event comes only from newmoney injected into an economy that would not otherwise have been spent. Thus, visitorscan be counted who reside outside the community <strong>and</strong> came to the locale specifically forthe special event, as can those who more time <strong>and</strong> money in the area because <strong>of</strong> the event.Money from residents that would have been spent on alternative expenditures in theabsence <strong>of</strong> the special event should not be counted as part <strong>of</strong> the economic impact.Be sensitive. Most private businesses do not wish to have their records a matter <strong>of</strong> publicrecord as it may be perceived as potentially harmful to their competitive business position.While gross receipts <strong>and</strong> franchise, contract <strong>and</strong> permit fees are usually a matter <strong>of</strong> publicrecord, levels <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it may not.3.2.7 ReferencesBichis-Lupas, Mihaela, <strong>and</strong> Neil Moisey. Fall 2001. A Benefit Segmentation <strong>of</strong> Rail-TrailUsers: Implications for Marketing by Local Communities. Journal <strong>of</strong> Park <strong>and</strong>Recreation Administrations, 19(2): 78-92.California State <strong>Parks</strong>. 2002. Concessions- Business Opportunities at State <strong>Parks</strong>. Availableat http://www.parks.ca.govCrompton, John. 2000. Measuring <strong>Economic</strong> Impact. Available athttp://rptsweb.tamu.edu/faculty/<strong>Economic</strong>Impact.pdfDallas, Holly. July 27, 2004. Recreation Supervisor, Therapeutic; Sacramento CountyRegional <strong>Parks</strong>. Email communication.East Bay Regional Park District. November 1, 2000. Regional <strong>Economic</strong> Analysis (Trends,Year 2000 & Beyond). Prepared by <strong>Economic</strong> & Planning Systems, Inc. Available athttp://www.ebparks.org/resources/pdf/misc/ecoreport.pdfEvenson, Rudy. August 4, 2004. Chief, Office <strong>of</strong> Special Park Uses, Golden Gate NationalRecreation Area. Email communication.29
Gitelson, Richard, Frank Guadagnolo, <strong>and</strong> Roger Moore. 1988. <strong>Economic</strong> Impact Analysis<strong>of</strong> a Community-Sponsored Ten-Kilometer Road Race. Journal <strong>of</strong> Park <strong>and</strong> RecAdmin 6(4).Greenway <strong>and</strong> Nature Center <strong>of</strong> Pueblo, http://www.gncp.org/Malzhan, Tim. August 6, 2004. South Central Field <strong>and</strong> Mobile Skills Crew Coordinator,Ice Age Park & Trail Foundation. Telephone communication.Massingham, Dan. August 4, 2004. Owner, Dan’s Trophies <strong>and</strong> Awards, Poplar Bluff, MO.Telephone communication.Muzik, Ed. August 13, 2004. Property Manager, Glacial Drumlin State Trail-East,Wisconsin Department <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources. Delafield, WI. Telephonecommunication.National Park Service Concessions, 2004.(http://inside.nps.gov/programs/division.cfm?div=40&page=home)Rudacille, Kate. July 28, 2004. L<strong>and</strong> Administration <strong>and</strong> Planning Manager, NorthernVirginia Regional Park Authority. Telephone communication.San Joaquin River Parkway <strong>and</strong> Conservation Trust, www.riverparkway.orgShamraevsky, Alex. July 28, 2004. Recreation Assistant, Pittsburgh <strong>Parks</strong> <strong>and</strong> RecreationDepartment. Telephone communication.Smith, Bob. July 29, 2004. Wildlife Habitat Supervisor, California Department <strong>of</strong> Fish <strong>and</strong>Game. Telephone communication.Turco, Doug, <strong>and</strong> Craig Kelsey. December 1993. “Measuring the <strong>Economic</strong>s <strong>of</strong> SpecialEvents.” <strong>Parks</strong> <strong>and</strong> Recreation.Utah Division <strong>of</strong> Travel Development. March 9, 2001. Utah: From Movie Reels to RealAdventure (News Release). Available at http://travel.utah.gov/utahinthemovies.html3.2.8 Additional InformationCattle Grazing/Leases- The following report summarizes a study that examines therelationship <strong>of</strong> publicly owned, Forest Service-managed summer grazing l<strong>and</strong> to privatelyownedfoothill ranches <strong>and</strong> explores the economic <strong>and</strong> social sustainability <strong>of</strong> ranching inthe Central Sierra Nevada. The report includes details on the value <strong>of</strong> permits to ranchers,average prices <strong>of</strong> forage supply alternatives, <strong>and</strong> methods for evaluating the worth <strong>of</strong> anallotment: Sulak, Adriana, <strong>and</strong> Lynn Huntsinger. June 2002. Sierra Nevada Grazing inTransition: The Role <strong>of</strong> Forest Service Grazing in the Foothill Ranches <strong>of</strong>30
- Page 1: ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF PARKS, RIVERS,
- Page 4 and 5: AcknowledgementsI am grateful to ma
- Page 6 and 7: 3.5.5 Sources of Information.......
- Page 8 and 9: Table 28. Hiking/Walking Organizati
- Page 10 and 11: 1 IntroductionParks, rivers, trails
- Page 12 and 13: Table 1.SectionAgency ExpendituresC
- Page 14 and 15: provide communities with economic,
- Page 16 and 17: the most current information on the
- Page 18 and 19: 3.1 Agency ExpendituresThis section
- Page 20 and 21: grants. About 25% of capital expend
- Page 22 and 23: The Marin Conservation Corps (MCC)
- Page 24 and 25: already been implemented and is ope
- Page 26 and 27: Table 5.Net Benefit Per Participant
- Page 28 and 29: WEST VIRGINIAWISCONSINEarthCorpsFed
- Page 30 and 31: contracts that gross over $800 mill
- Page 32 and 33: 3.2.2 Special EventsRevenue enhanci
- Page 34 and 35: park experience to an audience who
- Page 36 and 37: you have the opportunity to determi
- Page 40 and 41: California. A Report to The Sierra
- Page 42 and 43: powered activities 3 , a participan
- Page 44 and 45: Table 11. 2003 Sport Footwear Purch
- Page 46 and 47: 3.3.4 Fish and Wildlife-Related Rec
- Page 48 and 49: EQUIPMENT AND OTHER EXPENSESTotal $
- Page 50 and 51: Table 17. Estimates of Retail Expen
- Page 52 and 53: Table 19. U.S. Ski & Snowboard Indu
- Page 54 and 55: and from services related to the Pa
- Page 56 and 57: o $60 million in Harris County, TX,
- Page 58 and 59: League ofAmericanBicyclistsNational
- Page 60 and 61: SportingGoodsManufacturersAssociati
- Page 62 and 63: necessarily better, especially in s
- Page 64 and 65: Perspective. Available at http://ww
- Page 66 and 67: o Washington: $209 milliono West Vi
- Page 68 and 69: Economic Output Retail Sales Salari
- Page 70 and 71: Economic Output Retail Sales Salari
- Page 72 and 73: Table 35. Economic Impact of Sportf
- Page 74 and 75: All Anglers Non-Resident/Tourist An
- Page 76 and 77: Table 37. Per Capita Travel Receipt
- Page 78 and 79: their decision to return in the fut
- Page 80 and 81: Table 39. Visitors and Spending in
- Page 82 and 83: 2003). Data from California Departm
- Page 84 and 85: over 2003, despite high gas prices,
- Page 86 and 87: management changes or actions are e
- Page 88 and 89:
accommodations used, and other trip
- Page 90 and 91:
http://www.ncdot.org/transit/bicycl
- Page 92 and 93:
3.5 Estimating the Effects of Spend
- Page 94 and 95:
“leakage” of money from the reg
- Page 96 and 97:
Keep in mind that multipliers are s
- Page 98 and 99:
3.5.4 How to Use These Rationales i
- Page 100 and 101:
economy, only those expenditures th
- Page 102 and 103:
For example, be aware of the differ
- Page 104 and 105:
3.6 Health Care and FitnessThis sec
- Page 106 and 107:
active, approximately $575 million
- Page 108 and 109:
already had one heart attacko Impro
- Page 110 and 111:
uilt as part of sound policy to pro
- Page 112 and 113:
accounting for 14 million disabilit
- Page 114 and 115:
park amenities available or do not
- Page 116 and 117:
National Coalitionfor PromotingPhys
- Page 118 and 119:
100% of all health benefits to a si
- Page 120 and 121:
Pratt M, Macera CA, Wang G. 2000. H
- Page 122 and 123:
costs than normal weight; moderate
- Page 124 and 125:
References for Additional Informati
- Page 126 and 127:
3.7 Benefit EstimationParks, rivers
- Page 128 and 129:
Table 47.Forecasted Average Benefit
- Page 130 and 131:
Table 48.CriteriaRecreationExperien
- Page 132 and 133:
people using carefully designed and
- Page 134 and 135:
special government funds for causes
- Page 136 and 137:
Loomis, J. B., and White, D.S. 1996
- Page 138 and 139:
Economic Assessment for the Necedah
- Page 140 and 141:
Commercial UsesExpenditures byResid
- Page 142 and 143:
Outcomes Expenditures by GGNRA mana
- Page 144 and 145:
local transportation admissions and
- Page 146 and 147:
3.8.8 Educational ValueWhile it may
- Page 148 and 149:
the same municipality that are furt
- Page 150 and 151:
that do require storm water managem
- Page 152 and 153:
Summary of ActionsSimilar to corpor
- Page 154 and 155:
3.9 Resource Book AppendicesSeveral
- Page 156 and 157:
6. Spending in the area. Please rep
- Page 158 and 159:
local economy aren’t bringing in
- Page 160 and 161:
4 ConclusionIn 1995, the National P