http://www.ncdot.org/transit/bicycle/safety/safety_economicimpact.htmlOhio Division <strong>of</strong> Travel <strong>and</strong> Tourism, 2001. Fact Sheet. Available atwww.ohiotourism.comOhio <strong>Greenways</strong>. 1999. Little Miami Scenic Trail, <strong>Economic</strong> Study.Power, Thomas Michael. February 2002. The <strong>Economic</strong> Implications <strong>of</strong> Protecting theNatural L<strong>and</strong>scapes <strong>of</strong> the Southern Selkirk Region in the US <strong>and</strong> Canada. A reportprepared for The L<strong>and</strong>s Council. Available at www.umt.edu/econ/papers.htmRails-to-<strong>Trails</strong> Conservancy. 1997. ISTEA <strong>and</strong> <strong>Trails</strong>: Enhancement Fundingfor Bicycling <strong>and</strong> Walking. A pamphlet. More information on the Pinellas Trail, Florida isavailable at http://www.railtrails.org/find/totm/archives/02-01.aspRecreational Vehicle Industry Association (RVIA). 2004. News Release: RV travelers will spring into summer with more mini-vacations,survey shows. April 12, 2004. Available athttp://www.rvia.org/Media/newsreleases/breakingnews/p0429.htm News Release: 2004 RV shipment to set quarter-century record. June 8, 2004.Available at http://www.rvia.org/Media/newsreleases/breakingnews/p0424.htm News Release: Active Older American Embracing RV Travel. Available athttp://www.rvia.org/Media/newsreleases/background/p0226.htm RV Business Indicators. June 7, 2004.Regnier, C. 1989. Minnesota Off-Road Bike Trail Use: 1980-1988. St. Paul, MN:Minnesota Department <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources, <strong>Trails</strong> <strong>and</strong> Waterways Unit.Unpublished paper.Richardson, Robert B. April 2002. The <strong>Economic</strong> Benefits <strong>of</strong> Wildl<strong>and</strong>s in the EasternSierra Nevada Region <strong>of</strong> California. Prepared for The Wilderness Society, Availableat http://www.wilderness.org/Library/Documents/upload/<strong>Economic</strong>-Benefits-<strong>of</strong>-Wildl<strong>and</strong>s-in-the-Eastern-Sierra-Nevada-Region-<strong>of</strong>-California.pdfRudzitis, G., Johnson, R. The impact <strong>of</strong> wilderness <strong>and</strong> other wildl<strong>and</strong>s on local economies<strong>and</strong> regional development trends. In McCool, Stephen F., Cole, David N., Borrie,William T., O’Loughlin, Jennifer, compilers. 2000. Wilderness science in a time <strong>of</strong>change conference-Volume 2: Wilderness in the context <strong>of</strong> larger systems; 1999 May23-27; Missoula, MT: Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-2:14-26. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong>Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT.San Antonio Convention <strong>and</strong> Visitors Bureau. 2003. San Antonio 2002 Overnight LeisureDomestic Visitor Pr<strong>of</strong>ile. Available athttp://www.sanantoniovisit.com/local_partners/Research/DKSA2002OvernightLeisureVisitorPr<strong>of</strong>ile.pdf81
Schwecke, Tim, et al. 1989. A look at Visitors on Wisconsin's Elroy-Sparta Trail. Madison,WI: University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin - Extension Service, Recreation Research Center.Travel Industry Association <strong>of</strong> America (TIA). a: 2004. <strong>Economic</strong> Research: <strong>Economic</strong> Impact <strong>of</strong> Travel <strong>and</strong> Tourism. Available athttp://www.tia.org/Travel/econimpact.asp b: February 25, 2004. U.S. National parks Enjoy High Awareness <strong>and</strong> Satisfactionamong American Travelers. Available athttp://www.tia.org/Press/pressrec.asp?Item=317USDA Forest Service, Region 2. August 2001. National Visitor Use Monitoring Results:Rio Gr<strong>and</strong>e National Forest. Available athttp://www.fs.fed.us/recreation/programs/nvum/reports/year1/R2_Rio_Gr<strong>and</strong>e_final_082001.docVoinovich, George. August 25, 2003. Testimony by the Senator at Hearings on Restoration<strong>and</strong> Protection <strong>of</strong> the Great Lakes, U.S. Senate Committee on Environment <strong>and</strong> PublicWorks, Clevel<strong>and</strong>, Ohio.Webb, Craig. April 1998. “Liquid Assets: West Virginia’s Whitewater Rafting,”Hemispheres (Greensboro, NC: Pace Communications, Inc.,); 34.Western States Tourism Policy Council. 2002. Tourism Statistics: <strong>Economic</strong> Impact <strong>of</strong>Tourism in the West. Available athttp://www.dced.state.ak.us/wstpc/Publications/<strong>Economic</strong>Impact.htmWilliams, Clint. May 6, 2002. 'Comet' speeds tourists to town. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Pp.1E.York County Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Parks</strong> <strong>and</strong> Recreation. May 2000. Heritage Rail Trail County Park: 1999 User Survey <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong>Impact Analysis. Prepared by Interactive Marketing Solutions. June 2002. Heritage Rail Trail County Park: 2001 User Survey <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economic</strong>Impact Analysis. Prepared Interactive Marketing Solutions.82
- Page 1:
ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF PARKS, RIVERS,
- Page 4 and 5:
AcknowledgementsI am grateful to ma
- Page 6 and 7:
3.5.5 Sources of Information.......
- Page 8 and 9:
Table 28. Hiking/Walking Organizati
- Page 10 and 11:
1 IntroductionParks, rivers, trails
- Page 12 and 13:
Table 1.SectionAgency ExpendituresC
- Page 14 and 15:
provide communities with economic,
- Page 16 and 17:
the most current information on the
- Page 18 and 19:
3.1 Agency ExpendituresThis section
- Page 20 and 21:
grants. About 25% of capital expend
- Page 22 and 23:
The Marin Conservation Corps (MCC)
- Page 24 and 25:
already been implemented and is ope
- Page 26 and 27:
Table 5.Net Benefit Per Participant
- Page 28 and 29:
WEST VIRGINIAWISCONSINEarthCorpsFed
- Page 30 and 31:
contracts that gross over $800 mill
- Page 32 and 33:
3.2.2 Special EventsRevenue enhanci
- Page 34 and 35:
park experience to an audience who
- Page 36 and 37:
you have the opportunity to determi
- Page 38 and 39:
Use good survey methods. The better
- Page 40 and 41: California. A Report to The Sierra
- Page 42 and 43: powered activities 3 , a participan
- Page 44 and 45: Table 11. 2003 Sport Footwear Purch
- Page 46 and 47: 3.3.4 Fish and Wildlife-Related Rec
- Page 48 and 49: EQUIPMENT AND OTHER EXPENSESTotal $
- Page 50 and 51: Table 17. Estimates of Retail Expen
- Page 52 and 53: Table 19. U.S. Ski & Snowboard Indu
- Page 54 and 55: and from services related to the Pa
- Page 56 and 57: o $60 million in Harris County, TX,
- Page 58 and 59: League ofAmericanBicyclistsNational
- Page 60 and 61: SportingGoodsManufacturersAssociati
- Page 62 and 63: necessarily better, especially in s
- Page 64 and 65: Perspective. Available at http://ww
- Page 66 and 67: o Washington: $209 milliono West Vi
- Page 68 and 69: Economic Output Retail Sales Salari
- Page 70 and 71: Economic Output Retail Sales Salari
- Page 72 and 73: Table 35. Economic Impact of Sportf
- Page 74 and 75: All Anglers Non-Resident/Tourist An
- Page 76 and 77: Table 37. Per Capita Travel Receipt
- Page 78 and 79: their decision to return in the fut
- Page 80 and 81: Table 39. Visitors and Spending in
- Page 82 and 83: 2003). Data from California Departm
- Page 84 and 85: over 2003, despite high gas prices,
- Page 86 and 87: management changes or actions are e
- Page 88 and 89: accommodations used, and other trip
- Page 92 and 93: 3.5 Estimating the Effects of Spend
- Page 94 and 95: “leakage” of money from the reg
- Page 96 and 97: Keep in mind that multipliers are s
- Page 98 and 99: 3.5.4 How to Use These Rationales i
- Page 100 and 101: economy, only those expenditures th
- Page 102 and 103: For example, be aware of the differ
- Page 104 and 105: 3.6 Health Care and FitnessThis sec
- Page 106 and 107: active, approximately $575 million
- Page 108 and 109: already had one heart attacko Impro
- Page 110 and 111: uilt as part of sound policy to pro
- Page 112 and 113: accounting for 14 million disabilit
- Page 114 and 115: park amenities available or do not
- Page 116 and 117: National Coalitionfor PromotingPhys
- Page 118 and 119: 100% of all health benefits to a si
- Page 120 and 121: Pratt M, Macera CA, Wang G. 2000. H
- Page 122 and 123: costs than normal weight; moderate
- Page 124 and 125: References for Additional Informati
- Page 126 and 127: 3.7 Benefit EstimationParks, rivers
- Page 128 and 129: Table 47.Forecasted Average Benefit
- Page 130 and 131: Table 48.CriteriaRecreationExperien
- Page 132 and 133: people using carefully designed and
- Page 134 and 135: special government funds for causes
- Page 136 and 137: Loomis, J. B., and White, D.S. 1996
- Page 138 and 139: Economic Assessment for the Necedah
- Page 140 and 141:
Commercial UsesExpenditures byResid
- Page 142 and 143:
Outcomes Expenditures by GGNRA mana
- Page 144 and 145:
local transportation admissions and
- Page 146 and 147:
3.8.8 Educational ValueWhile it may
- Page 148 and 149:
the same municipality that are furt
- Page 150 and 151:
that do require storm water managem
- Page 152 and 153:
Summary of ActionsSimilar to corpor
- Page 154 and 155:
3.9 Resource Book AppendicesSeveral
- Page 156 and 157:
6. Spending in the area. Please rep
- Page 158 and 159:
local economy aren’t bringing in
- Page 160 and 161:
4 ConclusionIn 1995, the National P