o $60 million in Harris County, TX, for acquisition <strong>and</strong> development <strong>of</strong> parks(LTA, 2002).Table 24. Percent <strong>and</strong> Value <strong>of</strong> Ballot Measures ApprovedYear Measures approved New funding1998 126 <strong>of</strong> 150 (84%) $8.3 billion1999 92 <strong>of</strong> 102 (90%) $1.8 billion2000 174 <strong>of</strong> 209 (83%) $7.5 billion2001 137 <strong>of</strong> the 196 (70%) $1.7 billionSixty-seven <strong>of</strong> Oregon voters chose to set aside $45 million from state lottery proceedsto purchase river corridors, watersheds <strong>and</strong> wetl<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> native salmon habitat in 1998(TPL, 1999).In 1995 voters in Larimer County, CO passed an eight-year, 1/4 cent “Help PreserveOpen Spaces” sales tax, which yielded over $18 million. The money is used for thepurchase <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> or development rights so that open l<strong>and</strong>s can be preserved <strong>and</strong> farms<strong>and</strong> ranches can be kept in agricultural use (TPL, 1999).Between 1961-1995 New Jersey voters approved nine open space bond acts, whichraised $1.4 billion for New Jersey’s Green Acres l<strong>and</strong> acquisition program. In 1998,New Jersey voters also approved a referendum that created a stable source <strong>of</strong> fundingfor open space, farml<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> historic preservation <strong>and</strong> recreation development (NJDept <strong>of</strong> Environmental Protection, 2002).3.3.9 How to Use These Rationales in Your CommunityDemonstrate how leisure <strong>and</strong> recreation expenditures are important in your state,region, or community. Cite some <strong>of</strong> the examples given to show how people valuerecreation <strong>and</strong> open space opportunities. Gather similar information for your state, region,or community <strong>and</strong> present them at meetings <strong>and</strong> in publications. Take advantage <strong>of</strong> localuniversities that may be able to provide expertise on gathering such information.Quote the above examples to show how park- <strong>and</strong> trail-related expenditures areimportant to other economies. The examples provided focus upon a variety <strong>of</strong> aspects <strong>of</strong>how recreation/open space expenditures support local, regional, state, <strong>and</strong> nationaleconomies. If appropriate, local examples can be found <strong>and</strong> listed. Choose the activitiesmost relevant to your planning area; the size <strong>of</strong> the economy, <strong>and</strong> the type <strong>of</strong> impact.Recognize the multiplier effect <strong>of</strong> park expenditures. The effect <strong>of</strong> spending related toparks <strong>and</strong> trails is multiplied as local businesses patronized by park users purchase supplies<strong>and</strong> services from manufacturers <strong>and</strong> other businesses. This concept is further discussed inSection 3.5, Estimating the Effects <strong>of</strong> Spending, under the subsections “Direct, Indirect <strong>and</strong>Induced Effects” <strong>and</strong> “Multipliers.”Compare the economic effects <strong>of</strong> the park or trail to those <strong>of</strong> another facility orprogram. Compare the number <strong>of</strong> jobs supported or created by your park to those47
supported by a well-known local employer.Discuss effects <strong>of</strong> decisions that could alter visitation. Many activities such as naturalarea restoration, fish habitat improvement, increased publicity, better access, etc., canincrease recreational use. If such activities are proposed, calculate the effects <strong>of</strong> such achange. Use this information as base data for illustrating how changes in management(supply) or visitor needs (dem<strong>and</strong>) affect the park’s impact on the local economy.3.3.10 Sources <strong>of</strong> InformationRecreation <strong>and</strong> Sports Associations. Information on participation <strong>and</strong> spending related tooutdoor activities can be obtained from a number <strong>of</strong> recreation organizations. A partiallisting <strong>of</strong> such groups is below. Also consider contacting state <strong>and</strong> local recreationassociations in your area for additional information.AmericanSportfishingAssociationInternationalAssociation <strong>of</strong>Fish <strong>and</strong>WildlifeAgenciesRecreationalBoating <strong>and</strong>FishingFoundationTable 25. Angling Organizationshttp://www.asafishing.org Promote the social, economic,<strong>and</strong> conservation values <strong>of</strong>sportfishing in America.Publishes “Sportfishing inAmerica” which features theeconomic <strong>and</strong> social importance<strong>of</strong> sportfishing. <strong>Economic</strong> impactdata is broken down by state aswell as freshwater/saltwater.http://www.iafwa.org/Promotes sound resourcemanagement <strong>and</strong> strengthensfederal, state, <strong>and</strong> privatecooperation in protecting <strong>and</strong>managing fish <strong>and</strong> wildlife <strong>and</strong>their habitats in the publicinterest.http://www.rbff.orgWorks to increase participationin recreational angling <strong>and</strong>boating through increased publicawareness <strong>and</strong> appreciation <strong>of</strong>the need for conserving <strong>and</strong>restoring aquatic naturalresources.InternationalMountainBikingAssociationTable 26.http://imba.comBiking OrganizationsCreates, enhances <strong>and</strong> preservestrail opportunities for mountainbikers worldwide. Websitecontains research on the48
- Page 1:
ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF PARKS, RIVERS,
- Page 4 and 5:
AcknowledgementsI am grateful to ma
- Page 6 and 7: 3.5.5 Sources of Information.......
- Page 8 and 9: Table 28. Hiking/Walking Organizati
- Page 10 and 11: 1 IntroductionParks, rivers, trails
- Page 12 and 13: Table 1.SectionAgency ExpendituresC
- Page 14 and 15: provide communities with economic,
- Page 16 and 17: the most current information on the
- Page 18 and 19: 3.1 Agency ExpendituresThis section
- Page 20 and 21: grants. About 25% of capital expend
- Page 22 and 23: The Marin Conservation Corps (MCC)
- Page 24 and 25: already been implemented and is ope
- Page 26 and 27: Table 5.Net Benefit Per Participant
- Page 28 and 29: WEST VIRGINIAWISCONSINEarthCorpsFed
- Page 30 and 31: contracts that gross over $800 mill
- Page 32 and 33: 3.2.2 Special EventsRevenue enhanci
- Page 34 and 35: park experience to an audience who
- Page 36 and 37: you have the opportunity to determi
- Page 38 and 39: Use good survey methods. The better
- Page 40 and 41: California. A Report to The Sierra
- Page 42 and 43: powered activities 3 , a participan
- Page 44 and 45: Table 11. 2003 Sport Footwear Purch
- Page 46 and 47: 3.3.4 Fish and Wildlife-Related Rec
- Page 48 and 49: EQUIPMENT AND OTHER EXPENSESTotal $
- Page 50 and 51: Table 17. Estimates of Retail Expen
- Page 52 and 53: Table 19. U.S. Ski & Snowboard Indu
- Page 54 and 55: and from services related to the Pa
- Page 58 and 59: League ofAmericanBicyclistsNational
- Page 60 and 61: SportingGoodsManufacturersAssociati
- Page 62 and 63: necessarily better, especially in s
- Page 64 and 65: Perspective. Available at http://ww
- Page 66 and 67: o Washington: $209 milliono West Vi
- Page 68 and 69: Economic Output Retail Sales Salari
- Page 70 and 71: Economic Output Retail Sales Salari
- Page 72 and 73: Table 35. Economic Impact of Sportf
- Page 74 and 75: All Anglers Non-Resident/Tourist An
- Page 76 and 77: Table 37. Per Capita Travel Receipt
- Page 78 and 79: their decision to return in the fut
- Page 80 and 81: Table 39. Visitors and Spending in
- Page 82 and 83: 2003). Data from California Departm
- Page 84 and 85: over 2003, despite high gas prices,
- Page 86 and 87: management changes or actions are e
- Page 88 and 89: accommodations used, and other trip
- Page 90 and 91: http://www.ncdot.org/transit/bicycl
- Page 92 and 93: 3.5 Estimating the Effects of Spend
- Page 94 and 95: “leakage” of money from the reg
- Page 96 and 97: Keep in mind that multipliers are s
- Page 98 and 99: 3.5.4 How to Use These Rationales i
- Page 100 and 101: economy, only those expenditures th
- Page 102 and 103: For example, be aware of the differ
- Page 104 and 105: 3.6 Health Care and FitnessThis sec
- Page 106 and 107:
active, approximately $575 million
- Page 108 and 109:
already had one heart attacko Impro
- Page 110 and 111:
uilt as part of sound policy to pro
- Page 112 and 113:
accounting for 14 million disabilit
- Page 114 and 115:
park amenities available or do not
- Page 116 and 117:
National Coalitionfor PromotingPhys
- Page 118 and 119:
100% of all health benefits to a si
- Page 120 and 121:
Pratt M, Macera CA, Wang G. 2000. H
- Page 122 and 123:
costs than normal weight; moderate
- Page 124 and 125:
References for Additional Informati
- Page 126 and 127:
3.7 Benefit EstimationParks, rivers
- Page 128 and 129:
Table 47.Forecasted Average Benefit
- Page 130 and 131:
Table 48.CriteriaRecreationExperien
- Page 132 and 133:
people using carefully designed and
- Page 134 and 135:
special government funds for causes
- Page 136 and 137:
Loomis, J. B., and White, D.S. 1996
- Page 138 and 139:
Economic Assessment for the Necedah
- Page 140 and 141:
Commercial UsesExpenditures byResid
- Page 142 and 143:
Outcomes Expenditures by GGNRA mana
- Page 144 and 145:
local transportation admissions and
- Page 146 and 147:
3.8.8 Educational ValueWhile it may
- Page 148 and 149:
the same municipality that are furt
- Page 150 and 151:
that do require storm water managem
- Page 152 and 153:
Summary of ActionsSimilar to corpor
- Page 154 and 155:
3.9 Resource Book AppendicesSeveral
- Page 156 and 157:
6. Spending in the area. Please rep
- Page 158 and 159:
local economy aren’t bringing in
- Page 160 and 161:
4 ConclusionIn 1995, the National P