13.07.2015 Views

Technical Report for the Maricunga Gold Mine - Kinross Gold

Technical Report for the Maricunga Gold Mine - Kinross Gold

Technical Report for the Maricunga Gold Mine - Kinross Gold

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Kinross</strong> <strong>Gold</strong> Corporation<strong>Maricunga</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Report</strong>this in<strong>for</strong>mation yielded rare errors. Collar in<strong>for</strong>mation was also digitally checked against <strong>the</strong>surveyors’ final compilation file; this check also yielded rare decimal place errors. Erroneousdata was corrected and reloaded. The corrected data was subjected to two additionalindependent checks.14.3.2 Survey DataPrior to entering <strong>the</strong> downhole survey data into <strong>the</strong> database it was visually scanned <strong>for</strong>obvious errors. After entry, <strong>the</strong> data was extracted and printed <strong>for</strong> manual verification relativeto <strong>the</strong> original downhole survey data contained in <strong>the</strong> files and provided by Comprobe. Dataverification of 10% of <strong>the</strong> downhole survey data was completed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> survey data. Twoindependent checks of this data detected no errors. Visual inspections of <strong>the</strong> plotted holetraces also failed to identify any obvious errors or miss-plots.14.3.3 Lithology, Alteration, Oxidation, Vein and <strong>Mine</strong>ralization DataLithology, Alteration, Oxidation, Vein Description and <strong>Mine</strong>ralization data collected during <strong>the</strong>2002-2003 field season was verified against <strong>the</strong> original logs. A 10% check of <strong>the</strong> databaseyielded an unacceptable amount of errors and led to a 100% check. The 100% checkyielded an error rate of 3.5%, with most of <strong>the</strong> errors related to <strong>the</strong> recording of alteration.These errors were corrected.14.3.4 Analytical DataA random 10% of <strong>the</strong> analytical data was verified against <strong>the</strong> original assay certificates.Only rare errors were detected, usually pertaining to how results below detection wereentered in <strong>the</strong> database. Erroneous data was corrected and re-entered.14.3.5 Geotechnical DataTen percent of <strong>the</strong> geotechnical data collected during <strong>the</strong> 2002-2003 field program wasverified against <strong>the</strong> original geotechnical logs yielding a significant error rate. As a result, a100% verification process was initiated. Significant error rates were noted in <strong>the</strong> fracturesper-meterfield. Error rates in <strong>the</strong> structural measurement and RQD fields were related to<strong>for</strong>mat errors ra<strong>the</strong>r than data entry errors. These errors were corrected.55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!