13.07.2015 Views

ICAR Technical Series no. 7 - Nitra Proc.

ICAR Technical Series no. 7 - Nitra Proc.

ICAR Technical Series no. 7 - Nitra Proc.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Neijenhuis et al.Teat end callosity and clinical mastitisF. Neijenhuis 1 , H. Barkema 2 & H. Hogeveen 11Research Institute for Animal Husbandry (PV-Lelystad),P.O. Box 2176, 8203 AD Lelystad, The NetherlandsE-mail: f.neijenhuis@pv.agro.nl.2Animal Health Service, P.O. Box 361, 9200 AJ Drachten, The NetherlandsMastitis is still one of the eco<strong>no</strong>mically most important diseases in dairyfarming. The incidence rate of clinical mastitis ranges, according to severalresearches, from 12.7 to 30% per cow-year at risk. Bacteria that cause clinicalmastitis usually enter the udder through the teat canal. The first line ofdefence against clinical mastitis is therefore the teat canal, and changes inteat tissue around the teat canal may favour penetration of bacteria intothe udder (O’Shea, 1987).IntroductionMechanical forces during machine milking may induce changes in teatend tissue. Teat end callosity builds up until approximately 4 months oflactation and decreases thereafter (Neijenhuis et al., 2000). Cow factorslike teat end shape, teat position, teat length, milk yield, stage of lactationand parity are associated with the degree of teat end callosity (TEC)(Neijenhuis et al., 2000; Sieber and Farnsworth, 1981).The goal of this study was to examine the relationship between theoccurrence of clinical mastitis and TEC in more detail.Teat end callosity (TEC) was scored monthly for 1½ year at 15 farmsaccording to the Dutch teat end callosity classification system (Neijenhuiset al., 2000). The teat end callosity classification system consists of 5 callositythickness classes and distinguishes between smooth and rough rings. Thefarmers diag<strong>no</strong>sed clinical mastitis. Teat length and teat end shape wererecorded twice a year.Material andmethodWe determined differences in TEC between quarters within clinical mastitiscows, and the differences in TEC between clinical mastitis cows and pairedherd mates without clinical mastitis, taking into account days in milk andthe lactation month in which clinical mastitis occurred.<strong>ICAR</strong> <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Series</strong> - No 7199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!