13.07.2015 Views

Monorail Removal Project - Review of Environmental Factors (REF)

Monorail Removal Project - Review of Environmental Factors (REF)

Monorail Removal Project - Review of Environmental Factors (REF)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

There may be some short term potential for cumulative visual impacts to occur where otherbuilding works within the Sydney CBD are being carried out simultaneously. Visual impactswould also be associated with surface restoration works that follow removal <strong>of</strong> pedestal andfooting structures. Mitigation measures provided in section 10.4 would assist in minimising thepotential significance <strong>of</strong> the short term impacts.As noted above, the City <strong>of</strong> Sydney recognises the importance <strong>of</strong> street trees in the urbanenvironment. Existing street trees are particularly important within the CBD, as they providecontrast to the highly urban nature <strong>of</strong> the environment and amenity to the streetscape. Theproposal has the potential to impact on trees located in close proximity to the <strong>Monorail</strong>. Treesmay need to be trimmed or removed to allow works to occur. The works along Market Streetwould be undertaken to ensure that there are minimal impacts to the trees in this location. Notrees along Market Street would be removed. Trees along Darling Drive would be pruned asrequired for access purposes. Tree removal would be avoided where possible.In the event that removal is required, the contractor would obtain approval from Transport forNSW by submitting an ‘Application for <strong>Removal</strong> or Trimming Vegetation’. Where any treeremoval is required around Darling Harbour, the consent <strong>of</strong> SHFA may also be required. Anytrees subject to removal would be replaced in accordance with Transport for NSW’s ‘VegetationOffset Guide’.The removal <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Monorail</strong> would also present opportunities for future tree planting works to beundertaken where locations were previously constrained by the <strong>Monorail</strong> infrastructure.10.3.2 Long term impactsThe long term impact <strong>of</strong> the proposal on the visual amenity <strong>of</strong> the study area would be highlypositive. Photomontages for key viewing locations are provided in Figure 10.4 and Figure 10.5.These provide an indication <strong>of</strong> how the landscape would appear once the <strong>Monorail</strong> is removed.Long term impacts for each character area are summarised in Table 10.2.In summary, the proposal would:• enhance existing streetscape view corridors as a result <strong>of</strong> the removal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monorail</strong>pedestals, columns and beams• provide more legible street level visual connections, including short distance views towardbuilding facades• improve the setting <strong>of</strong> historical and heritage buildings and items, by enhancing the viewstowards the items and minimising the visual conflict with significant heritage structures(Pyrmont Bridge)• reduce the visual clutter in narrow CBD streets• removal <strong>of</strong> direct visual impacts for residents, <strong>of</strong>fice workers and people occupyingbuildings adjoining the <strong>Monorail</strong> loop• enhance the street environment by removing dominant columns and pedestals.GHD | Transport for NSW - <strong>Monorail</strong> <strong>Removal</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>REF</strong> | 97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!