04.12.2012 Views

6 5 - RR DONNELLEY FINANCIAL - External Home Login

6 5 - RR DONNELLEY FINANCIAL - External Home Login

6 5 - RR DONNELLEY FINANCIAL - External Home Login

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13. Restructuring Costs<br />

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES<br />

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED <strong>FINANCIAL</strong> STATEMENTS – (Continued)<br />

In 2009, we restructured our Charleston, West Virginia-based Eastern Division from a regional corporate<br />

headquarters to a regional field office consistent with the business model the company uses elsewhere in the<br />

country. As a result, we consolidated the management of our Eastern Division land, legal, accounting,<br />

information technology, geoscience and engineering departments into our corporate offices in Oklahoma City.<br />

The costs of the reorganization include termination benefits, consolidating or closing facilities and relocating<br />

employees. In addition, we had certain other workforce reductions that resulted in termination benefits. A<br />

summary of Chesapeake’s restructuring costs is presented below:<br />

Year Ended<br />

December 31, 2009<br />

($ in millions)<br />

Termination and relocation costs ............................................ $ 22<br />

Acceleration of restricted stock awards ....................................... 9<br />

Other associated costs .................................................... 3<br />

Total Restructuring Costs ................................................ $ 34<br />

14. Fair Value Measurements<br />

Certain financial instruments are reported at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. Under fair<br />

value measurement accounting guidance, fair value is defined as the amount that would be received from the<br />

sale of an asset or paid for the transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants, i.e.,<br />

an exit price. To estimate an exit price, a three-level hierarchy is used. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the<br />

inputs, which refer broadly to assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability, into<br />

three levels. Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities<br />

and have the highest priority. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are<br />

observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the<br />

financial asset or liability and have the lowest priority. Chesapeake uses a market valuation approach based on<br />

available inputs and the following methods and assumptions to measure the fair values of its assets and<br />

liabilities, which may or may not be observable in the market.<br />

Cash Equivalents. The fair value of cash equivalents is based on quoted market prices.<br />

Investments. The fair value of Chesapeake’s investment in Gastar Exploration Ltd. (NYSE Amex: GST)<br />

common stock is based on a quoted market price.<br />

Other Long-Term Assets and Liabilities. The fair value of other long-term assets and liabilities, consisting<br />

of obligations under our Deferred Compensation Plan, is based on quoted market prices.<br />

Derivatives. The fair values of our commodity derivatives are based on a third-party pricing model which<br />

utilizes inputs that are either readily available in the public market, such as natural gas and oil forward curves<br />

and discount rates, or can be corroborated from active markets or broker quotes. These values are then<br />

compared to the values given by our counterparties for reasonableness. Since commodity swaps do not<br />

include optionality and therefore have no unobservable inputs, they are classified as Level 2. All other<br />

commodity derivatives have some level of unobservable input, such as volatility curves, and are therefore<br />

classified as Level 3. For interest rate and foreign currency derivatives, we use the fair value estimates<br />

provided by our respective counterparties, which are classified as Level 3 inputs. These values are reviewed<br />

internally for reasonableness using future interest rate curves and time to maturity. Derivatives are also subject<br />

to the risk that counterparties will be unable to meet their obligations. We factor in non-performance risk in the<br />

valuation of our derivatives using current published credit default swap rates. To date this has not had a<br />

material impact on the values of our derivatives.<br />

Debt. The fair value of certain of our long-term debt is based on the face amount of that debt along with<br />

the value of related interest rate swaps.<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!