CONSCIOUSNESS
Download - Center for Consciousness Studies - University of Arizona
Download - Center for Consciousness Studies - University of Arizona
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
100 2. Neuroscience<br />
can be interpreted as ‘looking’ at each other. But the inversion of all the movements depicted<br />
on the retina sets the problem of chirality within the visual system. C3<br />
120 A New Paradigm of Vision: 40Hz Coherence in Amacrine Cells. Microsaccade<br />
Drift/Tremors and Visual Illusions David Saunders <br />
(San Diego, CA)<br />
Amacrine cells interconnect bipolar cell/ganglion cell synapses across an area in the<br />
retina. 40Hz coherence in amacrine cells has been reported. What could be its function? I<br />
believe it is associated with the phototransduction cascade in cone photoreceptors and the<br />
drift/tremor phase of microsaccades, the quick transit phase being too fast and brief to sufficiently<br />
stimulate cones. I submit that the function of some, or all, amacrine cells is to track,<br />
correlate, contrast and compile the information gathered from a single bit of the scene bitmap<br />
that strikes the retina as the retina moves under it when the eye executes the drift/tremors of<br />
microsaccades and saccades. A saccade is a microsaccade with an extra long quick transit.<br />
There are approximately 29 unique types of amacrine cells, each type dedicated to one of the<br />
five discrete layers of the retina. The amacrine cell field of coverage varies greatly among<br />
the types from very narrow for some to extremely wide for others, and the spatial distribution<br />
within and among the five retinal layers produces tiling such that any quick transit of a<br />
microsaccade or a saccade in any direction and for any distance will be tracked. This results<br />
in the continuity of information produced by a scene bit from the previous drift/tremor to the<br />
present drift/tremor. I contend that it is the amacrine cells that produce the signal that exits<br />
the eye via the ganglion cells, and that the signal is composed of all the information gathered<br />
from both the previous and present drift/tremors. This functioning offers an explanation for<br />
many things. Our foveas, which produce our most important, detailed central vision, are composed<br />
of only red/green cones and yet we also see blue in this area. Blue cones are found in<br />
the parafovea, which surrounds the fovea. I contend that previous and present drift/tremors<br />
will have traversed both the fovea and the parafovea and therefore we see both red/green and<br />
blue in our central vision. I believe that there has to be a contrast and comparison between the<br />
information gathered by the previous and present drift/tremors, and there will be because each<br />
bit of the scene bit map will have traversed a constantly changing cohort of photoreceptors.<br />
When there is no change, vision ceases because the amacrine cells no longer have cross input<br />
to work with. This latter point, not neural adaptation, explains visual fading: when an image<br />
is stabilized on the retina, the image disappears. It is also why we do not see the opaque blood<br />
vessels of our retinas: wherever the retina moves, the blood vessels move. Another point is<br />
that our vision seems to be composed of a series of frames or snapshots, and I believe this is<br />
an artifact of the way amacrine cells function across space and time to produce an output signal.<br />
This latter explains the ‘wagon wheel illusion’. Lastly, the passage of time in the process<br />
explains visual masking, change blindness, change-lag effect and other visual illusions. C12<br />
2.3 Other sensory modalities<br />
121 What is Synesthesia? - A Current Overview Sean Day (English & Journalism, Trident Technical College, North Charleston, SC)<br />
In 1826, Mueller posited the law of specific nerve energies, stating that perception is defined<br />
and constrained by the pathway by which sensory information is carried. This, in turn,<br />
became a matter of debate regarding functionalist approaches to the nature of qualia; which,<br />
in turn, are cornerstones of some current approaches to the hard question of consciousness.<br />
However, if we are going to explore what insights the phenomena of synesthesiae bring to<br />
our understanding of consciousness, we must first have a good grasp as to what synesthesiae<br />
actually are, and are not. ‘Synesthesia’ is often defined as the involuntary, invariable<br />
overlaying of sensory perception either onto perceptions from ‘another sensory modality’,<br />
such as color overlaid upon musical sounds, or upon a cognitive constructs, such as the letter<br />
‘A’ or the month ‘January’ being connected with an odor or flavor. There are (at least)<br />
four different categories of synesthesia: congenital; adventitious; drug-induced; and via altered<br />
states of consciousness (ASC) attained through meditation or trance. This presenta-