30.08.2015 Views

CONSCIOUSNESS

Download - Center for Consciousness Studies - University of Arizona

Download - Center for Consciousness Studies - University of Arizona

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

222 6. Culture and the Humanities<br />

History, Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills, Mindful Attention Awareness during<br />

Video Game Play Scale, Immersive Tendency Questionnaire, and Presence Questionnaire.<br />

Only those who reported that traditionally hard core games (i.e., first person shooter, strategy,<br />

action, adventure, and role playing) were their favorite type were included in the subsequent<br />

factor analysis. Only 77 of these played a game prior to filling out the surveys. For these 77<br />

individuals, most of whom were male (n=57), a factor analyses was computed based on scale<br />

and subscale scores and items including gender. These variables were entered into a principle<br />

component factor analysis and five factors emerged. The first factor offers support for the<br />

primary hypothesis. That is, the younger they were when they began playing and the more<br />

presence they felt while playing a recent game were associated with a tendency to experience<br />

immersion and with three mindfulness scores from the Kentucky Mindfulness scale and one<br />

from the video game mindfulness scale. The other factors further illuminated this relationship.<br />

In this preliminary inquiry we found some support for the hypothesized relationship between<br />

game play (history and presence) and mindfulness attenuated by a tendency to become absorbed<br />

(immersion). When gender entered the equation then gaming was either negatively<br />

related to mindfulness (females) or not related to mindfulness (males). P6<br />

6.9 Ethics and legal studies<br />

341 Consciousness and Human Rights: Preservation and Protection of Consciousness-<br />

Based Technologies of Indigenous Peoples Lurleen Brinkman <br />

(American Indian and Indigenous, University of Tulsa College of Law, Lawrence, KS)<br />

Even as Western scholars are beginning to explore the ontology and science of consciousness,<br />

many consciousness-based technologies are in a critical state of existence throughout<br />

the world. That is, many indigenous and traditional knowledge systems, such as mind-body<br />

healing practices, in addition to critical languages, are on the brink of extinction. This presentation<br />

will address the issues of American Indian and other indigenous peoples of the<br />

world in their quest to preserve and protect their local, consciousness-based technologies.<br />

This presentation will also address the role of the Western researcher in the appropriate reflection<br />

of consciousness-based technologies in academia. The methodology for this presentation<br />

will include critical analysis, comparative analysis, and case studies, and will conclude with<br />

a discussion on the guidelines (as they relate to consciousness studies in academia) from the<br />

2007 U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. P6<br />

342 Key Bioethical Questions at the Cusp of Our Assuming the Governance of<br />

Evolution Timothy Dolan (Public Administration,<br />

The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Gyonggi Do Korea, Republic of Korea)<br />

A theme review of the 58 principle articles published in The Journal of Bioethics (AJB)<br />

was conducted for content pertaining to genetic policy. The initial review found some references<br />

with one special issue with specific focus on individual access to genetic testing. Many<br />

deal with popular concerns around the seemingly perennial question of the status of human<br />

fetuses in stem cell research and cloning. Other articles are more prosaic ranging from moral<br />

questions over the development and use of performance-enhancing technologies for soldiers<br />

in the military to the emergence of nanotechnology as a legitimate concern for bioethicists. If<br />

this topical inventory is at all representative of the field, bioethicists have indeed at least begun<br />

to wrestle with this very significant emerging issue while maintaining a focus on those perennial<br />

ones. A further analytical breakdown of governance themes indicates the focus clustering<br />

around the following: 4 articles on personal control of genetic information; 2 of which also<br />

spoke to governmental policy on this dimension) 7 articles on government policy primacy<br />

over genetic innovation (3 focusing on shared governance with individual control over a:<br />

personal genetic information (2) and b: corporate involvement (1) 3 articles on corporate policies<br />

governing genetic products (1 of which seeing shared government policy formation and<br />

regulation on the issue of monopoly patent rights) 1 article on physician primacy on decisions<br />

to use biotech in the treatment of patients. If this snapshot actually represents the distribution<br />

of foci among bioethicists, then it would suggest that the emphases are somewhat misplaced.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!