30.08.2015 Views

CONSCIOUSNESS

Download - Center for Consciousness Studies - University of Arizona

Download - Center for Consciousness Studies - University of Arizona

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

150 3. Cognitive Sciences and Psychology<br />

3.17 Temporal consciousness<br />

209 Why Consciousness Doesn’t Sleep: An Information Theory of Continuity in<br />

Consciousness Francesco Giorlando, Gorbunova, Anastasia <br />

(Neuroscience, University of Melbourne - Ph.D Candidate, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire<br />

United Kingdom)<br />

The default mode has been primarily described as a functional network (e.g., Raichle &<br />

Snyder, 2007). This paper explores the question of the raison d’etre of the default mode network<br />

from a neuro-informatical perspective. The primary position presented is that the default<br />

mode is a signal pattern found in neuroimaging studies that reflects an underlying constituent<br />

activity. This activity arises from the continuity of the conscious self in all states, including<br />

sleep. Self-consciousness is defined here with reference to the (P)synamic theory (Gorbunova<br />

& Giorlando, TSC 2008). In light of this theory, information fluxes bridging the external and<br />

internal worlds (here, the brain system is viewed as a type of internal model with specific comparator<br />

functions) require the type of continuous activity seen in the default mode network.<br />

The question of why the correlated areas change under cognitive and sensory load is also<br />

addressed. This is achieved by relating information to energy with reference to Landauer’s<br />

principle and to modern information theoretical approaches to consciousness (e.g., Tononi,<br />

2008). The theory is supported by an integration of experimental data, particularly relating to<br />

the role of timekeeping as a function of default mode activity and to aberrations of temporal<br />

continuity as demonstrated clinically and experimentally. P9<br />

210 In Defense of Diachronic Perceptual Atomism Enrico Grube<br />

(Philosophy, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX)<br />

Diachronic perceptual atomism is the view that temporal experiences such as seeing a<br />

car move or hearing a melody can be reduced to successions of non-temporal, momentary<br />

experiences. This view has been rejected by virtually all thinkers about time consciousness<br />

ever since William James famously asserted that “a succession of feelings, in and of itself,<br />

is not a feeling of succession” (1890: 629). Subsequently it has often been assumed without<br />

much further argument that atomism must be mistaken and that an adequate theory of temporal<br />

experience will have to involve either the doctrine of the specious present (cf. James<br />

1890, Broad 1923, Dainton 2000, Tye 2003) or some special sort of “retentional” memory (cf.<br />

Husserl 1905, LePoidevin 2007). In this paper, I evaluate the phenomenological objection<br />

underlying James’ dictum, as well as other related arguments that have been raised against<br />

atomism: the argument from the continuity of experience, which claims that if atomism were<br />

true, experiences would not be continuous or diachronically unified in the way they in fact<br />

are; the argument from slow motion, which claims that atomism cannot explain the distinction<br />

between directly seeing an object move and merely seeing that it is moving; and the argument<br />

from the metaphysics of experience, which claims that atomism involves commitment to an<br />

implausible “cinematic” or “snapshot” view of experience. I argue that none of these arguments<br />

are persuasive, and that atomism should be seen as a viable alternative to both specious<br />

present theory and memory theory. C 16<br />

211 Mind-Wandering in Daily Life: An Experience-Sampling Study Xiao-Lan Song,<br />

Wang Xiao (College of Education, Zhejiang Normal University,<br />

China, Jinhua, Zhejiang China)<br />

Mind wandering is a too common personal experience to draw attention. We always fall<br />

into our internal mental world constantly no matter what we are doing and where we are. The<br />

ebb and flow of thought, episodic,or images make up great part of ‘the stream of consciousness’<br />

out of our intention, and we sometimes notice it and sometimes not. Different from a<br />

large number of experimental studies about TUT(task unrelated thought) , we are interested<br />

in the mindwandering experience in our real life. We use experience-sampling method to<br />

collect the online experience and its psychological and physical backgroud. 120 participants<br />

were signaled in random time point during 3 days and requested to fill in the questionare

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!