CONSCIOUSNESS
Download - Center for Consciousness Studies - University of Arizona
Download - Center for Consciousness Studies - University of Arizona
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2. Neuroscience 107<br />
collaboration between the hemispheres and in therapeutic or creative dyads produces both<br />
presence and poetry. What was absent from Jaynes and Persinger was the role of childhood<br />
trauma in dissociation. Yet, 19th-century pioneers in psychology had already discovered the<br />
traumatic origins of dissociation. Recent scientific research is showing how genetic predisposition<br />
plus trauma cause dissociation along with observable changes in the brain. EEG<br />
and PET scans have demonstrated that distinct neural networks lie at the base of dissociative<br />
states, with differences as striking as blindness versus sight. Neuropsychologist and attachment<br />
theorist Allan Schore points to the role of the right hemisphere in developing a core<br />
sense of self through the mother-infant bond and dividing it in response to childhood trauma<br />
and later stressors. Analysts from the nineteenth through the twenty-first century have witnessed<br />
frequent paranormal claims, such as telepathy, in mediums and dissociative patients.<br />
Case studies point to the role of an empathic therapeutic matrix where unconscious transfers<br />
of information occur and imaginative constructs both heal the patient and change the therapist’s<br />
own beliefs. C20<br />
2.8 Anesthesia<br />
2.9 Cellular and sub-neural processes<br />
133 The Hypersite Model of Electrofractal Consciousness and the Search for “Bright<br />
Matter” Erhard Bieberich (Institute of Molecular Medicine,<br />
Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA)<br />
Consciousness research has focused on defining the physiological substrate of consciousness.<br />
However, defining this substrate may not distinguish between the physiological substance<br />
generating consciousness and the substance that is conscious. While it is reasonable<br />
to assume that these substances are similar, conscious or “bright matter” must have additional<br />
features that distinguish it from a non-conscious physiological substance. Bright matter<br />
emerges as a physical substance mediating information sharing between cells and molecules.<br />
In this study, the location of consciousness will be defined as a hypersite, a biological entity<br />
that encompasses the physiological substrate of consciousness and the bright matter emerging<br />
from it. The hypersite can be formed by an ensemble of molecules within a single neuron,<br />
but may also stretch over cells such as a cortical column of neurons or a neural network.<br />
The amount of shared information will determine the spatial extension and duration of the<br />
hypersite, which will eventually become self-aware. In this study, we will discuss how information<br />
can be shared in such a way that a short-lived molecular hypersite with primitive<br />
proto-consciousness extends to an ensemble of neurons with continuous self-awareness. Instrumental<br />
to this type of information sharing is the fractal topology of bright matter and its<br />
programming by a neural network with equivalent topology. We will also discuss overlapping<br />
electron orbitals in membrane lipids and microtubules as candidate substrate for bright matter<br />
(“electrofractal consciousness”). Finally, we will discuss how bright matter can be generated<br />
in an artificial device and how its presence can be detected. C3<br />
134 Clarifying the Qubit - Response to recent attack against Penrose-Hameroff<br />
ORCH OR Stuart Hameroff (Anesthesiology, Psychol., CCS,<br />
University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ)<br />
INTRODUCTION The Penrose-Hameroff orchestrated objective reduction (Orch OR)<br />
theory postulates quantum computation in microtubules (MTs) inside brain neurons as an<br />
explanation for consciousness. Orch OR has been attacked by McKemmish et al (Phys Rev<br />
E, 80:021912, 2009) who assert Orch OR in MTs is biologically unfeasible, and unsalvageable.<br />
BACKGROUND MTs are cylindrical lattices of peanut-shaped tubulin proteins. The<br />
basic Orch OR idea is that discrete MT tubulin states act as information bits and quantum<br />
bits (qubits) in MT computers inside brain neurons. Orch OR suggests MT tubulin qubits<br />
switch coherently and compute by entanglement with other tubulins, performing quantum<br />
computations which self-collapse by Penrose objective reduction. SPECIFIC CRITICISM<br />
OF ORCH OR McKemmish et al focus on switching between discrete tubulin bit and qubit