TUZLU SU SALTWATER
14B_Catalogue
14B_Catalogue
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
78 Adrian Parr<br />
Denemeler / Essays<br />
79<br />
of Palestinian neglect is, in the words of Said, denying ‘the Palestinians a historical<br />
presence’. (2) This process of re-presenting Palestine under a Western image of what<br />
constitutes Palestine-Israel means that not only are Palestinian farming traditions and<br />
food autonomy lost, but that Palestinian memories and history are erased as well. (3)<br />
Striation also occurs as sewerage from the settlements overflows on shabbos (Sabbath)<br />
because no-one works at the plant on the Jewish day of rest so the toxic muck<br />
trickles down the hillside and into Palestinian farmland. Underground water currents<br />
are striated when they are captured and diverted to Israeli settlements by the Israeli<br />
Administration or to more densely populated areas of the West Bank by the Palestinian<br />
Authority, leaving rural Palestinians and the nomadic Bedouins parched with thirst.<br />
The same applies to the underground springs that burst through the earth nourishing<br />
farmland, for when tapped the ground is drained and the desert grows, as is the case<br />
in Auja in the Lower Jordan Valley region.<br />
The logic of securitisation has a temporal condition as well. The movement of Palestinians<br />
is never routine. They are always on the verge of being arbitrarily stopped at a<br />
checkpoint for hours and sometimes even days. The continual interruption of Palestinian<br />
people and goods in and out of the West Bank, as Jewish settlers freely move<br />
across the divide, fills everyday Palestinian life with uncertainty. Not even Palestinian<br />
school buses can travel the main roads guarded by the IDF, forcing school children to<br />
walk long distances in what is clearly dangerous traffic for a child to navigate. In this<br />
context, any amount of routine is a welcome relief. (4)<br />
In 2014, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon vehemently condemned Israeli Prime Minister<br />
Benjamin Netanyahu for the appropriation of approximately 1,000 acres of land near<br />
Gvaot in the West Bank to establish new settlements. He explained that this ‘risks paving<br />
the way for further settlement activity, which – as the United Nations has reiterated on<br />
many occasions – is illegal under international law and runs totally counter to the pursuit<br />
of a two-state solution.’ (5) Israeli land-grabs in the West Bank present obvious barriers to<br />
peace on both sides. Despite verbally condemning the Israeli Administration, the UN,<br />
as with so many other bodies keeping the peace and upholding human rights under<br />
international law, does not have the power to directly stop the appropriation of West<br />
Bank land. But this situation is nothing new. Indeed, the peacekeeping efforts of the UN<br />
have come under heavy criticism for failing to stop, or even curb, numerous instances of<br />
political and ethnic violence. (6) To be fair, the UN’s peacekeeping efforts are paralysed<br />
by a lack of financial resources, a shortage of ground troops, weak political clout, and<br />
a restrictive mandate that allows peacekeepers only to fight in self-defence. Does this<br />
mean, as many argue, that the UN as an international body formed with the specific aim<br />
of maintaining peace is now irrelevant? (7) Not necessarily. To assess the relevance and<br />
effectiveness of the UN on the basis of whether or not it can safeguard civilians and property<br />
from violence places the organisation in the ultimate Catch-22 scenario because it<br />
gives it a reactive role, while denying it the power to react on behalf of those it is instructed<br />
to protect. It can only react to protect itself. What would happen, then, if the emphasis<br />
shifted away from peace-as-security onto enabling peacefulness to emerge?<br />
The UNESCO world heritage site of Battir in the West Bank is a compelling example<br />
of cultural-environmentalism as the basis for peace building. The widian (hillsides)<br />
of Battir are situated a few miles southwest of Jerusalem in the Palestinian territory<br />
of the West Bank. The approximately 4,000 year-old Roman stone walls follow the<br />
sloping geography, forming terraces that channel water from underground springs irrigating<br />
fields of vegetables, olive trees and grape vines that Palestinian farmers have<br />
cultivated for hundreds of years. In Battir, the territorial boundary separating the West<br />
Bank from Israel is perforated by the watershed and Roman terraces, as well as the Palestinians<br />
who farm fields located on both sides of the dividing line. In the valley below<br />
runs a railway line for the Tel-Aviv to Jerusalem train. As the geopolitical situation between<br />
Israelis and Palestinians worsens and the living conditions of Palestinians continues<br />
to deteriorate, the children of Battir have been taking their frustrations out on<br />
the train as it passes through the valley by throwing rocks at it. In response, the Israeli<br />
military planned to extend the Security Barrier through the valley, which would have<br />
cut farmers off from the land along with inflicting irreversible damage upon an ancient<br />
watershed. At stake was an intricate spatio-temporal distribution system of water,<br />
farming practices, cultural memory, indigenous flora and fauna, and food autonomy.<br />
On 13 December 2012, Israel’s High Court of Justice ruled in favour of a petition presented<br />
to it by the non-governmental organisation Friends of the Earth Middle East<br />
(FoEME) to halt military plans to extend the separation barrier through the valley of<br />
Battir. (8) FoEME members include Israelis, Palestinians and Jordanians, and the organisation<br />
collaborated on the petition with the Battir Village Council and the Israel Nature<br />
and Parks Authority (NPA). On 20 June 2014, at the 38th session of the UNESCO World<br />
Heritage Commission, Battir was listed as a World Heritage Site, prompting the Israeli<br />
High Court of Justice to freeze the construction of the wall on 4 January 2015. (9)<br />
The goal of the UNESCO World Heritage programme is to protect and preserve global<br />
heritage. This is based upon the idea that a natural or manmade wonder has a universal<br />
cultural value that exceeds political interests and national borders and transcends<br />
the current moment. The processes and elements of ecological and cultural production<br />
hereby operate as singularities in a field pregnant with political potential. It is this<br />
unlikely combination of invoking the singular character of cultural and environmental<br />
heritage as a means through which peacefulness can occur that the 2014 UNESCO<br />
World Heritage listing of Battir’s terraces and watershed achieves.<br />
In Battir, blue, green and grey infrastructures combine to form complex sociocultural<br />
ecologies. The mixture of Roman aqueducts, olive and oak trees, local produce,<br />
springs, underground currents and stone terraces along the Battir hillsides produce<br />
a creative matrix that consists of interplays between soft and hard surfaces out of<br />
which a different ecological political register emerges, encouraging a spatio-temporal<br />
condition counter to that of surveillance, dispossession and domination. Battir’s exuberant,<br />
abundant and lush, watered vitality participates with impermeable forms and<br />
static structures, defiantly challenging the forces of division, occupation and control<br />
that have decisively changed local landscapes and ways of life.<br />
If, from a Palestinian perspective, peacefulness consists of activating smooth spaces<br />
amidst the striated spaces of occupation and dispossession and concomitantly reorganising<br />
and routinising time, then the UNESCO World Heritage listing has provided<br />
the conditions necessary for both to be realised. The process of nominating and listing<br />
Battir as a UNESCO World Heritage Site treated nature and culture as singularities<br />
whereby the flows of water and earth, conflict and peace, bordering and commoning,<br />
colonisation and decolonisation pull against each other. (10) The UNESCO listing recognises<br />
that the site is a conglomeration of sensitive ecological points, as Deleuze<br />
might describe it, that in their neutrality present social ‘turning points’ that have the<br />
capacity to inflect the political landscape differently. As hydrological cycles, irrigation,<br />
planting, harvesting, cooking and localised memories encounter and resonate with<br />
each other, ‘divergent series’ are generated – to paraphrase Deleuze’s thoughts on