07.12.2012 Views

BoR (11) 06b BEREC report NGA Country Cases - IRG

BoR (11) 06b BEREC report NGA Country Cases - IRG

BoR (11) 06b BEREC report NGA Country Cases - IRG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Below, some additional questions on bitstream:<br />

<strong>BoR</strong> (<strong>11</strong>) <strong>06b</strong><br />

� Please describe the different points of access available (e.g. at the broadband PoP, MDF)<br />

and the layers (layer 2, 3 )<br />

Local level – access on MSAN point or DSLAM as an equivalent device.<br />

Regional level – transmission access to BRAS (broadband remote access server).<br />

National level - access in administrated networks through IP/MPLS.<br />

� Is quality differentiation possible and how is it implemented? Please mention the relevant<br />

quality parameters and state whether guaranteed bandwidth is available.<br />

� Is multi-cast technology available for alternative operators (e.g. as part of the regulated<br />

product)?<br />

Yes, as a part of non-discrimination obligation Telekom Slovenije will have to provide such<br />

forms of bit-stream access as enable operators to provide all the services that can be<br />

supplied to residents and/or business users through such assess in equal quality in relation<br />

to services supplied in the retail market by itself or through subsidiary undertakings or<br />

partner undertakings (e.g. IP telephone (VoIP), IP television (IPTV), Video on Demand<br />

(VoD), virtual private network (VPN MPLS) and other services). These services should be<br />

provided in a similar manner in relation to services Telekom Slovenije provides to itself or<br />

its subsidiary undertakings or partner undertakings, if necessary it should also allow<br />

installation of the alternative operator‟s equipment.<br />

More specific questions regarding bitstream resulting from the Commission’s Draft <strong>NGA</strong><br />

Recommendation:<br />

� Did your NRA apply exceptions (e.g., in certain geographic areas) from imposing<br />

wholesale bitstream access on SMP providers? If so, elaborate on the reasoning of that<br />

decision. The Draft <strong>NGA</strong> Recommendation foresees in Art. 37 the possibility of removing a<br />

bitstream access obligation if access to the fibre loop, in a given geographic area, results<br />

in effective competition.<br />

No, no exceptions since market 5 is a national geographic market with no remedy<br />

differentiation.<br />

4 Migration issues<br />

� Is there a migration path envisaged from current to next generation access products?<br />

What does it look like? To what extent is the NRA involved in setting up the migration<br />

path?<br />

285

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!