BoR (11) 06b BEREC report NGA Country Cases - IRG

e) Reasonable prices, not determined by CMT.
f) No long-term pricing models considered.
3.2 Concentration point/ manhole unbundling
BoR (11) 06b
Covered in the general access obligation to in-house wiring: when first operator deploys
junction boxes (distribution point) in the public domain (e.g. in manholes) thus covering
several buildings, then the access point is moved to that point.
Access conditions are identical to those specified in the general access obligation to in-house
wiring.
3.3 Cabinet unbundling
Subloop unbundling (SLU) is imposed as a remedy in Market 4 with the same obligations as
LLU: cost orientation, non-discrimination and transparency; detailed operational procedures
for access are not defined as currently there is no demand.
3.4 ODF unbundling
Not available as fibre is not included in market 4 (FTTH is deployed in a point to multipoint
architecture). Instead, access to the fibre terminating segment is available via the symmetric
access to in-building wiring.
More specific questions regarding fibre unbundling mainly resulting from the Commission’s
Draft NGA Recommendation:
� Specify for Market 4 which of the remedies according to Art. 9-13 AD are in place with
regard to FttH/B and FttN.
All remedies are in place with regard to FTTN/FTTB (both are forms of SLU). Fibre (as
FTTH) is not included in Market 4.
� Art. 22f Draft NGA Rec. foresees to mandate unbundled access to the fibre loop
irrespective of the network architecture and topology implemented by the SMP operator.
Are there any exceptions applying to SMP providers (e.g., in certain geographic areas)
from such an obligation? If so, specify these exceptions and elaborate on the reasoning for
not imposing unbundled access to the fibre loop.
� Specify the conditions of the reference offer for unbundled access to the fibre loop, in
particular those conditions that go beyond the minimum list of conditions as set out in
Annex II FD (→ Art. 24 Draft NGA Rec).
296