BoR (11) 06b BEREC report NGA Country Cases - IRG

BoR (11) 06b
initially expected. Are there any measures in place to solve the problem of stranded assets
and what do they look like (e.g. compensation schemes 5 )?
The conditions defined for MDF-closure are designed to avoid those issues, given the time
period allowed for the decommission.
� Are there any provisions relating to the costs of migration? E.g., how are the costs of
migration split between the SMP operator and the competitors?
No such provisions exist currently.
5 Transparency regarding civil engineering infrastructure
� Art. 17 of the Draft NGA Recommendation foresees the establishment of a database
containing information on (e.g.) geographical location, available capacity of all ducts 6 . In
case such a database exists already in your country, explain:
Access to a database is provided by Telefónica as part of its Reference Offer for duct
access (imposed in Market 4 analysis). It provides information about the geographical
location and characteristics of the civil infrastructure (ducts, manholes, poles, etc). It is
available to operators requesting access.
- Who established/runs this database: the NRA or another institution, possibly in cooperation
with the NRA?
The database is managed by the incumbent operator.
- Which data are collected in this database?
Cartographic maps showing location and number of available ducts, chambers and poles.
- Does the information collected cover just telcos or also non-telcos?
Just telcos: the civil infrastructures of Telefónica.
- How is the information being provided, on a voluntary basis or based on obligations?
Specify the legal grounds for any obligations.
Based on obligations imposed in the analysis of market 4.
5 See BoR (10) 08, Ch. E.2.
6 Note: In its Opinion to this Draft Recommendation BEREC suggested to replace “all ducts” with
“civil engineering infrastructure”.
301