07.12.2012 Views

BoR (11) 06b BEREC report NGA Country Cases - IRG

BoR (11) 06b BEREC report NGA Country Cases - IRG

BoR (11) 06b BEREC report NGA Country Cases - IRG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>BoR</strong> (<strong>11</strong>) <strong>06b</strong><br />

f) According to actual expenditure, no fixed tariffs because this product has up until now<br />

been scarcely requested.<br />

3.2 Concentration point/ manhole unbundling<br />

Access has to be provided at the point where the relevant product can be accessed in<br />

unbundled form, independent from the surrounding infrastructure, whether street cabinet or<br />

manhole.<br />

3.3 Cabinet unbundling<br />

a) mandated, figures not available.<br />

b) Product definition (main features, e.g. location of access point along the value chain).<br />

On December 4 2009 BNetzA specified in a ruling chamber decision the conditions for<br />

access to Telekom Deutschland GmbH‟s access infrastructure. The decision requires<br />

Telekom Deutschland GmbH to provide a) access to the street cabinets and b) duct<br />

access. Originally, there was also an obligation to provide access to dark fibre (unless duct<br />

access is available). However, this decision was overruled by the Federal Administrative<br />

Court in January 2010.<br />

The general obligation to provide these services was already set out in the regulatory order<br />

of BNetzA‟s decision (June 27 2007) concerning access to the local loop, street cabinet<br />

access and access to ducts and dark fibre without however specifying the specific access<br />

conditions for the services to be provided.<br />

In the context of the ladder of investment, access to the street cabinet reflects the left side<br />

of the ladder showing the access products whereas duct access is an element of the<br />

ladder‟s right side (wholesale products to reach the access point).<br />

Since summer 2008 Telekom Deutschland GmbH and competitors had tried to reach a<br />

voluntary agreement on these issues. In August 2009, Vodafone‟s fixed network division<br />

requested BNetzA to settle the dispute. This Vodafone case was settled by BNetzA.<br />

Several similar other cases were decided afterwards based on the principles of the “pilot”<br />

decision.<br />

Telekom Deutschland GmbH is required to provide access to its street cabinets thereby<br />

enabling competitors to install their own DSLAMs.<br />

The cabinets have sufficient space for up to four further DSLAMs. Due to waste heat and<br />

depending on the power supply, co-location may be limited to two further DSLAMs in<br />

practice.<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!