07.12.2012 Views

BoR (11) 06b BEREC report NGA Country Cases - IRG

BoR (11) 06b BEREC report NGA Country Cases - IRG

BoR (11) 06b BEREC report NGA Country Cases - IRG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>BoR</strong> (<strong>11</strong>) <strong>06b</strong><br />

g) NITA has put a measure on the incumbent not to take actions which have a negative<br />

effect (downgrade of capacity) on copper lines used by alternative operators. Exceptions<br />

exists (e.g. general filling of the network). This is probably more relevant for LLU but<br />

does also apply to sub loops.<br />

3.4 ODF unbundling<br />

a) ODF unbundling is not available on a mandated basis. NITA has not seen any examples<br />

on voluntary access and has not collect information from TDC on this issue.<br />

b) There is no explicit definition of concentrations point/manhole unbundling or equivalent<br />

since it is not mandated in NITAs regulation.<br />

c) – g) Can not be answered due to the answer to a).<br />

More specific questions regarding fibre unbundling mainly resulting from the Commission’s<br />

Draft <strong>NGA</strong> Recommendation:<br />

� Specify for Market 4 which of the remedies according to Art. 9-13 AD are in place with<br />

regard to FttH/B and FttN.<br />

All remedies are in place with regard to FTTN.<br />

With regard to FTTH no remedies are in place as this is not regulated on Market 4. The<br />

reason for this is that the fibre roll-out is primarily carried out by alternative operators<br />

(power utility companies) with a totally different network. Therefore unbundled fibres in the<br />

access-part will is not demanded (switching cost are to high, coverage to low etc.).<br />

However since the decision on Market 4 was published the incumbent has acquired a fibre<br />

network from one power utility company and has started supply in that geographic area of<br />

Denmark. This will lead NITA to investigate whether unbundled fibre should be included in<br />

next market 4 examination.<br />

� Art. 22f Draft <strong>NGA</strong> Rec. foresees to mandate unbundled access to the fibre loop<br />

irrespective of the network architecture and topology implemented by the SMP operator.<br />

Are there any exceptions applying to SMP providers (e.g., in certain geographic areas)<br />

from such an obligation? If so, specify these exceptions and elaborate on the reasoning for<br />

not imposing unbundled access to the fibre loop.<br />

See above.<br />

� Specify the conditions of the reference offer for unbundled access to the fibre loop, in<br />

particular those conditions that go beyond the minimum list of conditions as set out in<br />

Annex II FD (→ Art. 24 Draft <strong>NGA</strong> Rec).<br />

See above.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!