13.12.2012 Views

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

125<br />

night is not yet over. Malfred goes to the window and pulls up the blind to let in the<br />

light. Shortly afterwards, there is a sudden noise of glass breaking. At first, the<br />

audience does not see what has caused the noise; there is instead a reaction shot of<br />

Malfred in close-up, seen through a broken pane of glass. Once again, the camera<br />

focuses on an extreme close-up of Malfred’s eyes, but this time, there is an expression<br />

of joy on her face, as if, in a moment of epiphany, she is able to really “see” for the first<br />

time. She picks up a rock, which is black, like the rocks at the beach – presumably the<br />

cause of the broken window. She stares at it and touches it, closing her eyes as though<br />

savouring its reality.<br />

The camera pans away from her to the photo of her and Wilfred, and the audience<br />

realizes that the glass of the photograph has been broken vertically separating her image<br />

from Wilfred’s by the rock thrown through the window. It is significant that in this<br />

moment of epiphany, Malfred’s ties with the past have symbolically been broken. The<br />

camera continues zooming in on the photo to a close-up of her face. The last shot of the<br />

film is of Malfred lying dead on the floor. One possible reading of this image is that she<br />

has finally achieved her goal of being able to see the true nature of the world, but as the<br />

shattered windowpane suggests, the shock of reality has been too much for her to bear.<br />

Alternately, we might interpret the rock as proof that she really has been terrorized by a<br />

prowler. The image is ambiguous but highly evocative. The camera moves in closer,<br />

then tilts up to the window, a powerful image of the border between outside and inside,<br />

civilization and wilderness. The film ends with a freeze-frame of the window.<br />

As in the case of the original novel, the film is so strongly coloured by subjectivity that<br />

the viewer is never entirely sure what is waking reality and what is dream or flashback.<br />

We remain close to Malfred’s viewpoint (while occasionally taking a step outside it, as<br />

in the camera movement that reveals the disconnected telephone cord) and we share in<br />

her delusions - or are they in fact, penetrating insights into reality (like Kurtz’s “The<br />

horror! The horror!” at the climax of Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness)? 414 Ward<br />

later commented, he wished he had held the final shot of the film longer. He added: “A<br />

rock that appears seemingly from nowhere near the end, also figured in a classroom shot<br />

414<br />

Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness and the Secret Sharer: The Complete Texts, ed. Franklin Walker<br />

(New York: Bantam Books, 1969) 131.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!