13.12.2012 Views

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

157<br />

have been made if I’d waited until all the finance was available”. 523 In fact, the film<br />

was begun with only one third of the necessary finance, and Ward had to try to get<br />

further finance as he went along. An incident occurred which could well have resulted<br />

in the destruction of the completed film. A fire in Ward’s flat destroyed all of his<br />

belongings including all the publicity stills for the film. As The Evening Post reports<br />

the story, In Spring “escaped incineration by pure chance”, due to Ward having left the<br />

print of the film in his car overnight. 524<br />

Reception<br />

After its release, international response to the film was overwhelmingly positive. The<br />

film shared the Grand Prix prize at the 1982 Cinéma du Réel documentary festival in<br />

France, a reviewer for Sonovision commenting on the strength of the film’s visual<br />

impact in comparison with many of the documentaries screened in competition. 525 It<br />

also won a Silver Hugo Award at the 1980 Chicago Film Festival. In 1980, it was<br />

screened at the San Francisco Film Festival in the New Directors series, where the<br />

director of the festival, Albert Johnson, described the film as “documentary raised to the<br />

highest level of cinema humanism”. 526 Subsequently, In Spring and A State of Siege<br />

toured the USA, and consequently, critical response to In Spring in the USA tended to<br />

make comparisons between the two films. While the observational documentary style<br />

of In Spring is naturally somewhat different from the dramatic style of A State of Siege,<br />

what the two films do have in common, apart from their similarities of subject-matter,<br />

are minimal dialogue and reliance on images to carry the narrative. Kevin Thomas, in a<br />

review for the Los Angeles Times, wrote that the films complement each other “as<br />

profoundly compassionate and beautiful portraits of solitary women struggling to<br />

survive in a harsh elemental world”. He identified Ward as “the major talent emerging<br />

from the burgeoning New Zealand cinema” and drew similarities between the films in<br />

their visual style: “Ward […] avoids conventional exposition and narration to trust his<br />

images to express the inner lives of these women”. While Thomas saw both films as<br />

“poetry”, he pointed out that they are also “devastating” commentaries on the society in<br />

523<br />

Ward, "That Personal Quality," 44.<br />

524<br />

Bruce Watson, "Movie Escapes Thorndon Blaze," The Evening Post 10 April 1978.<br />

525<br />

"Impressions Sur Quelques Images Du Réel (Powerful Imagery of Vincent Ward)," Sonovision April<br />

1982.<br />

526<br />

Albert Johnson, "Focus on Vincent Ward," Alternative Cinema 12.3&4 (1984/5): 10.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!