13.12.2012 Views

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

185<br />

They got the tractor going and towed Birdie’s hut through a line of washing which<br />

caught fire, and headed off across the paddock with the burning washing in tow. The<br />

ending did contain some elements of the ending envisaged in <strong>Draft</strong> Three, such as<br />

Birdie urinating on the engine’s motor and shaking his fist at the sky, but the final shot<br />

was of the camera moving “away and up and up and up into the air until we can see<br />

away over the hills to the sea and the distant horizon”. 614 <strong>Draft</strong> Four was the final<br />

version of the script, and Ward commented that: “The film didn’t change drastically in<br />

shooting. We lost about ten scenes, and it became more crystalline and economical” (a<br />

very interesting phrase to describe the qualities Ward sought). 615 It is clear, however,<br />

that the choice of ending remained a problem. In this draft, Birdy still figured<br />

prominently (as a kind of Lear figure). The ultimate version would complete the shift<br />

of emphasis to Toss.<br />

While the successive drafts of the screenplay dealt with some of the narrative<br />

weaknesses, there were still unclear aspects that raised the question: To what extent<br />

should an unorthodox film-maker like Ward, with his strong interest in images,<br />

symbols, and the deeper layers of the mind, concern himself with conventional narrative<br />

expectations? Even in its final form, Vigil left itself open to criticisms. For example,<br />

Matthew Aitken’s article in Illusions concludes that “in Vigil, while scenes have a<br />

moment-by-moment power that is immediately apparent to the audience, this power<br />

fails to build into a cohesive overall narrative and is lost in the hollowness of the film<br />

overall”. 616 Aitken acknowledges that the film uses a point-of-view structure, in which<br />

we are led to strongly identify with the characters - particularly Toss, but to a lesser<br />

extent Liz. 617 In the first part of the film, this is effective in establishing several<br />

important points. “Through extensive subjectification, Toss has been identified as the<br />

film’s main character. Through identification with her we have learnt that she was fond<br />

of, perhaps even idolised her father, and that she sees a link between his death and<br />

Ethan’s arrival in the valley”. Aitken contrasts the depth with which we are shown her<br />

developing relationship with Ethan with the lack of insight the audience has into the<br />

character of Liz. The result is that in the scenes that follow the “beans to God”<br />

sequence, where the audience begins to be aware of Liz’s reaction to Toss and Ethan’s<br />

614 Ward and Tetley, “First Blood Last Rites”, 122.<br />

615 Mitchell, "Vincent Ward: The Eloquence of Isolation," 38.<br />

616 Aitken, "Sightlines on the Usurper," 9.<br />

617 Aitken, "Sightlines on the Usurper," 4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!