13.12.2012 Views

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18<br />

Cinema Without Walls. Corrigan regards auteur theory as a “particular brand of social<br />

agency”, evident in the status of the auteur as celebrity. 65 He argues: “if auteurism – as<br />

a description of movies being the artistic expression of a director – is still very much<br />

alive today, the artistic expression of contemporary directors is fully bound up with the<br />

celebrity industry of Hollywood”. 66 Meaghan Morris has also noted that today “the<br />

primary modes of film and auteur packaging are advertising, review snippeting, trailers,<br />

magazine profiles – always already in appropriation as the precondition, and not the<br />

postproduction of meaning”. 67 My thesis will take account of this commercial process<br />

as it impinges upon Ward’s career, but obviously my conception of him as auteur<br />

continues to look back to the aesthetic debates initiated by Romanticism and critics such<br />

as Bazin. To see an auteur as a brand-name is only one, very narrow reading of the<br />

term. As Caughie implies, the various forms of and debates around auteur theory cover<br />

a large part of the “tradition” of film criticism over the years.<br />

In my exploration of various notions of authorship, I was particularly struck by<br />

Rivette’s notion that an auteur is someone who speaks in the first person, as this seemed<br />

to me to be one of the most important distinctions between Ward’s work and the films<br />

of other New Zealand directors of the same era. To understand Ward’s films it is<br />

necessary to reach some understanding of who this person is who is speaking, and how,<br />

and it is therefore appropriate to explore his personal history, the industry in which he<br />

operates, the artistic traditions of Romanticism and Expressionism and the New Zealand<br />

context, all of which inform his highly individual approach to filmmaking. While some<br />

of Bazin’s notions of auteurism also seem applicable to Ward – in particular that he<br />

writes his own stories (or is closely involved in the script-writing process), and that he<br />

has a personal vision and identifiable visual style – I wish to avoid some of the excesses<br />

of auteur theory by exploring the contributions made by Ward’s collaborators and by<br />

acknowledging the constraints placed on the director by practical contingencies and by<br />

the industrial contexts in which his films were made. To do so has necessitated an<br />

examination of as much of the filmmaking process as possible. While my research has<br />

tended to support Downie’s emphasis on Ward’s exceptional involvement in many<br />

aspects of production, and on the force of his “sensibility”, the interviews I conducted<br />

65 Corrigan, "Auteurs and the New Hollywood," 43.<br />

66 Corrigan, "Auteurs and the New Hollywood," 38-39.<br />

67 Meaghan Morris quoted in Timothy Corrigan, A Cinema without Walls: Movies and Culture after<br />

Vietnam (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1991) 106.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!