13.12.2012 Views

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

179<br />

just how much goes on the floor. That shocked me, a week’s shoot on the floor, and<br />

you realise it’s your fault as a writer”. 599<br />

The sometimes very long speeches he had written for the film needed to be much<br />

shorter, and he learned that “it doesn’t matter what you’re doing […], in a film, there’s<br />

only one main character. We’d gone ahead and I had been thinking that what we were<br />

doing was making this current and this story that moved towards a logical conclusion<br />

that was to do with the dynamics between four people – four co-equals – Birdie, Toss,<br />

Ethan, Elizabeth”. 600 This was reflected in <strong>Draft</strong> Two of the screenplay, which includes<br />

four scenes before the opening proper, described as The Old Man (a scene of Birdie<br />

working on the metal hawk in his hut at night), The Hunter (Ethan hunting deer in the<br />

early morning), Elizabeth (Liz making bread for breakfast) and The Child (Toss coming<br />

into the kitchen before breakfast to tell her mother that she wanted to accompany her<br />

father on his work around the farm that day). The opening of the actual film is a longshot<br />

of Justin working on the farm at the edge of the cliff, followed by scenes of the<br />

other characters around the farm. Each of the four characters is given equal screen time,<br />

but significantly, Justin, who figures only briefly in the film before his death, is seen<br />

initially only in long-shot as a distant figure dwarfed by the cliffs. Ward comments that:<br />

I felt that each of the characters had his (or her) own story. When Graeme<br />

Tetley and I were writing the script, it was a battle in the early stages as to which<br />

character would emerge as the central one. Even though it turned out to be the<br />

child, all three (Toss, her mother and grandfather) had something in common:<br />

they were all going through a period of incredible change in their lives […]. It<br />

was probably because of the mother that I had the film set in the mid-1960s<br />

instead of, say the 1930s, because the 1960s was a time when women were<br />

undergoing all kinds of upheaval, social, political and sexual. 601<br />

As pointed out by Tetley, there is significantly less dialogue in the film than in the early<br />

drafts. (This had been the case also with A State of Siege). Initially some of the<br />

backstory of the film was made explicit through the addition of minor characters but<br />

these were later dropped. In <strong>Draft</strong> Two for example, there was a scene between the<br />

mourners at Justin’s funeral where one of the mourners explains that Justin had little to<br />

599 Lynette Read, interview with Graham Tetley, 4 December 1998.<br />

600 Lynette Read, interview with Graham Tetley, 4 December 1998.<br />

601 William Dart, "Interview with Director, Vincent Ward," Rip It Up March 1985: 92.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!