13.12.2012 Views

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

309<br />

time Romantic – and far removed from the secular concerns of most prime-time<br />

documentary-making in New Zealand today.<br />

Ward was one of the first Pakeha filmmakers to take a serious interest in Maori culture.<br />

His subject-matter – the treatment of a mentally disabled person in a rural Maori<br />

community – was one that appears not to have been previously dealt with. The film was<br />

not an easy one to make since Ward felt himself to be an outsider to the community and<br />

was unfamiliar with Maori language and culture. There were also many difficulties in<br />

the process of making the film – the problem of dealing with a stubborn old lady, only<br />

being able to shoot one day out of seven, technical difficulties, problems in the funding<br />

of the film, and so on. It was typical of Ward both to tackle such a difficult and<br />

controversial subject, and to have the persistence to see it through. In doing so, he<br />

created a lasting testament to the old lady’s belief in spiritual values and to her<br />

particular version of a traditional way of life.<br />

The reception of the film was mixed - most critics overseas and in New Zealand were<br />

enthusiastic, but it received negative responses from some Maori critics on the grounds<br />

that Ward had brought his own (Pakeha) sensibilities and world-view to bear on a<br />

subject that, by not being Maori, he was incapable of understanding. The criticisms<br />

made by two critics, Parekowhai and Bilbrough, demonstrate some of the weaknesses of<br />

their auteurist assumptions, particularly in their incorrect attribution of aspects of the<br />

film to aesthetic choices made by the director when they were in fact a result of<br />

practical necessities. Neither critic had researched the local context of the film or the<br />

process of making it and this led to inaccuracies. There are lessons here for auteur<br />

criticism. Their criticisms carried more weight in cultural terms – there was indeed a<br />

danger of the film romanticising the exotic “other”.<br />

The process of making In Spring One Plants Alone had an enormous effect on Ward<br />

personally, and Vigil, his first film as a professional filmmaker, carried through some of<br />

the concerns and themes of In Spring. The film was the third of a trilogy of films that<br />

focused on strong female characters isolated from society. It represented, however, a<br />

change in direction towards films more grounded in the director’s own experiences and<br />

background. Other differences from his previous work were the more accessible, less<br />

austere style, focusing to a greater degree on action than on the psychological state of<br />

the characters (although this was still an important aspect). It displayed the familiar

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!