13.12.2012 Views

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

160<br />

could on film”. 537 This is a more nuanced formulation. The critic’s attempt to<br />

deconstruct Ward’s film by identifying contradictions founders because he is apparently<br />

unfamiliar with the particular mode of documentary sometimes described as “reflexive”<br />

which acknowledges the presence of the filmmaker but still seeks to achieve as accurate<br />

a representation as possible (an important proviso). In this type of documentary:<br />

“Rather than hearing the filmmaker engage solely in an interactive (participatory,<br />

conversational, or interrogative) fashion with other social actors, we now see or hear the<br />

filmmaker also engage in metacommentary, speaking to us less about the historical<br />

world […] than about the process of representation itself”. 538 Elements of this<br />

reflexivity are evident in In Spring for example, in Ward’s off-camera comments to<br />

Niki. Lurking behind Bibrough’s critique is an uneasiness about the subject-matter (a<br />

political sensitivity that had grown in the course of the 1980s), as shown by his<br />

comment: “We are not simply watching a disinterested record of a couple whose<br />

existence has been excluded and marginalised by dominant middle-class pakeha<br />

culture”. 539<br />

Bilbrough does acknowledge one strength of Ward’s approach - the fact that the<br />

avoidance of voice-over allows the viewer to become “more sensitive to body language<br />

as a relatively unmediated source of information about Puhi and Niki”. Bilbrough cites<br />

as an example Niki’s hands, which “do the talking, splaying, clenching, stiffening,<br />

imaging out the physical and psychological aspects of his ‘illness’ for us throughout the<br />

film”. 540 Helen Martin also vividly describes the hands in the film:<br />

Niki’s [hands], flexing, stiff, tensed, eloquently convey his pain and frustration;<br />

Puhi’s gnarled old pieces of leather, working hands, testifying to a life of<br />

physical labour […]. Important in the Ringatu faith is the gesture of the<br />

‘upraised hand’ (that is in fact the translation of the word ‘Ringatu’). The hands<br />

are used ceaselessly during prayer. If Puhi’s hands are invaluable to her as<br />

manual tools they are also of spiritual significance. Niki’s hands are in perfect<br />

537<br />

Ward, “A Documented Account of the Making of In Spring One Plants Alone,” <strong>Introduction</strong>.<br />

538<br />

Bill Nichols, Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary (Bloomington: Indiana<br />

University Press, 1991) 56.<br />

539<br />

Bilbrough, "In Spring One Plants Alone: Telling the Story," 15-16.<br />

540<br />

Bilbrough, "In Spring One Plants Alone: Telling the Story," 15.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!