13.12.2012 Views

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

146<br />

are spoken largely to a third person and not to each other”. 485 Again this lends itself to<br />

an approach whereby actions are allowed to speak for themselves, almost in the manner<br />

of a silent film. Subtext is hugely important and the viewer is encouraged (or assumed)<br />

to be active in reading between the lines. There is no voice-over commentary to explain<br />

what is happening.<br />

Ward’s approach to the documentary was to use a cinéma vérité or “direct cinema” style<br />

similar to that of the Maysles brothers. In the <strong>Introduction</strong> to his dissertation, he cites<br />

their documentary Grey Gardens (1976), a film about an eccentric mother and daughter<br />

living in seclusion, as exemplifying the approach he wished to take in making In Spring<br />

One Plants Alone, and identifies a number of features which characterise this type of<br />

documentary and which he wished to use as a model. 486 The first of these is that the<br />

filmmakers develop a rapport with the subject of the film. Ward suggests that many<br />

television documentaries, through lack of time, do not do this, and in fact there is a<br />

school of thought stemming from the Man Alive type of documentary, that “all sign of<br />

rapport between subject and filmmaker should be removed”. In contrast, Ward believes<br />

that, “A personal relationship there and the acknowledgement of it can give a freshness<br />

and veracity to the film”. 487<br />

Another feature Ward wished to emulate was the reflexive realism of Grey Gardens.<br />

Contrary to the practice followed in many mainstream television documentaries, the<br />

subjects were not made to project a persona or to re-enact any sequences in an attempt<br />

to create an unreal illusion of life, as thought the camera were not present. Instead, “the<br />

filmmaker is there as the recorder of an event with a role to play in the action. He<br />

acknowledges to the audience that he is present […]. Nor do the subjects appear to be<br />

re-enacting their daily actions”. At the same time, Ward sought to encourage the<br />

subject of the film to be as unselfconscious as possible by building up a good<br />

relationship with the subjects and shooting lots of footage over a long period of time.<br />

Ward quotes Albert Maysles as saying: “The greatest influence on our moviemaking<br />

485 Ward, “A Documented Account of the Making of In Spring One Plants Alone,” Section on Aims.<br />

486 In fact, Ward had not seen Grey Gardens before he began work on In Spring, but as he had to write a<br />

documented account of the making his film for his DipFA, he needed to relate it to existing models,<br />

particularly cinéma vérité which he had read about. He saw even at the time that it did not really fit the<br />

paradigm in terms of its intention. (Lynette Read, telephone interview with Vincent Ward, 17 December<br />

2003.)<br />

487 Ward, “A Documented Account of the Making of In Spring One Plants Alone,” <strong>Introduction</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!