13.12.2012 Views

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

173<br />

the ability of the artist to create objects which will shake up his/her audience<br />

through their very uniqueness, allowing the audience to see beyond the vista of<br />

the ordinary and commonplace. Like the romantic artist, Herzog adheres to the<br />

notion that ‘never before seen images’, that art, can only be created through<br />

sacrifice and suffering. And finally, in keeping with romantic ideals, Herzog<br />

seems consciously to cultivate the presupposition that the artist and his/her work<br />

can be readily identified with the person creating those forms. 584<br />

As Corrigan points out, however, the production of each of Herzog’s films seems to<br />

generate “at least one story of suffering and anguish, which may or may not be true”,<br />

but which serves to mythologise the director. 585 The above description implies a more<br />

extreme and confident approach than one would expect to hear Ward expressing, but<br />

clearly there are similarities. Herzog’s documentaries are as relevant to the comparison<br />

as his dramas. Ward’s autobiographical account of the making of In Spring with its<br />

stories of the film almost being destroyed by fire, the director’s ill-health and the huge<br />

challenges involved in making the film might be seen by a sceptical reader as serving a<br />

similar purpose in the myth-making process. 586 At their best, however, both Ward and<br />

Herzog achieve the ambitious goal of linking everyday and spiritual realities. We may<br />

turn once again to Bazin for a vivid formulation of this project. The context was the<br />

fact that artists had always been torn between two opposing impulses:<br />

one, primarily aesthetic, namely the expression of spiritual reality wherein the<br />

symbol transcended its mode; the other, purely psychological, namely the<br />

duplication of the world outside […]. The great artists, or course, have always<br />

been able to combine the two tendencies. They have allotted to each its proper<br />

place in the hierarchy of things, holding reality at their command and moulding<br />

it at will into the fabric of their art. 587<br />

In Spring is one of the most successful New Zealand attempts to combine these two<br />

tendencies, and what ultimately shines through is not only, as Parekowhai fears, the<br />

“personal mythology” of the film-maker, but equally the aroha and faith of an old<br />

584<br />

Timothy Corrigan, ed., The Films of Werner Herzog: Between Mirage and History (New York:<br />

Methuen, 1986) 29.<br />

585<br />

Corrigan, ed., The Films of Werner Herzog: Between Mirage and History 30.<br />

586<br />

Ward, Edge of the Earth: Stories and Images from the Antipodes 22.<br />

587<br />

Bazin, What Is Cinema? 11.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!