13.12.2012 Views

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

Draft 2 PhD Introduction - ResearchSpace@Auckland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9<br />

Eisner’s and Kracauer’s arguments in view of the current revival of interest in Weimar<br />

cinema and rejects the hard-and-fast distinction made by many critics between<br />

Expressionist cinema and the so-called “realist” Weimar cinema by pointing out the<br />

similarities in their themes and subject matter.<br />

Theoretical Approach and Methodology<br />

My thesis inevitably falls within the category of auteur studies. Ward has been widely<br />

regarded as one of New Zealand’s strongest candidates for auteur status, as a director<br />

with a unique vision and a strong involvement in all aspects of production. Hans-<br />

Günther Pflaum, writing about Vigil in the Süddeutsche Zeitung, already identified<br />

Ward as “an auteur, a promising debutant director who knows how to exploit his<br />

medium more radically and decisively, than any other first-timer”. 33 John Downie<br />

defends the value of seeing Ward in these terms despite the tendency for film theory<br />

over recent decades to have focused on issues of representation and reception to the<br />

detriment of auteur theory, on the grounds that: “with a filmmaker such as Vincent<br />

Ward, we have a punctilious, obsessive sensibility which labours to assert itself as<br />

something more than just good craftsman or virtuoso technician. His presence is<br />

palpably central to the entire fact of a film’s life”. 34<br />

The notion of the director as being centrally responsible for a film’s form, style and<br />

meanings is one of the most influential ideas in cinema history. As has often been<br />

noted, the origins of auteur theory lie in nineteenth-century Romantic notions of<br />

“artistic genius” that “resisted the forces of the market in the interests of artistic<br />

autonomy in opposition to ‘commercial, socially conformist art’”. 35 The idea of the<br />

artist as the autonomous genius will be discussed further in Chapter One, but this notion<br />

could be seen as informing Ward’s auteurist approach to his films. One of the<br />

problems, however, with “adopting a fairly consistent romantic position in relation to<br />

creativity”, according to John Caughie, was that “it exposed film aesthetics to the<br />

contradictions of those romantic principles of individual creativity which formed the<br />

basis of nineteenth- and twentieth-century criticism, when applied to an expressive form<br />

33<br />

Pflaum quoted in Jones, Projecting a Nation: New Zealand Film and Its Reception in Germany 13.<br />

34<br />

Downie, The Navigator: A Mediaeval Odyssey 2.<br />

35<br />

Pam Cook, ed., The Cinema Book: A Complete Guide to Understanding the Movies (New York:<br />

Pantheon Books, 1985) 115.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!